Home Philosophy Philosophical Considerations of Political Polarization
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Philosophical Considerations of Political Polarization

  • William J. Berger , Daniel J. Singer , Aaron Bramson , Patrick Grim , Jiin Jung and Bennett Holman
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This chapter illustrates how philosophy and political science can inform one another by providing an overview of philosophical contributions the authors have made on the topic of political polarization. The authors outline three contributions they have made to understanding political polarization, particularly of the epistemic kind, discussing work that gives clearer terminology for and ways of measuring polarization, precise mechanistic accounts of polarization, and a novel normative view about a possible source of polarization that casts polarization as a possible outcome of rational, but limited, agents interacting. This last contribution illustrates, contra recent work, how dynamics akin to epistemic bubbles and echo chambers can develop without associated epistemic vices. Taken together, these projects can serve as a guide for producing philosophical work which both contributes to a mainstream disciplinary literature as well as informs cross-disciplinary, empirical literatures in the social sciences.

Abstract

This chapter illustrates how philosophy and political science can inform one another by providing an overview of philosophical contributions the authors have made on the topic of political polarization. The authors outline three contributions they have made to understanding political polarization, particularly of the epistemic kind, discussing work that gives clearer terminology for and ways of measuring polarization, precise mechanistic accounts of polarization, and a novel normative view about a possible source of polarization that casts polarization as a possible outcome of rational, but limited, agents interacting. This last contribution illustrates, contra recent work, how dynamics akin to epistemic bubbles and echo chambers can develop without associated epistemic vices. Taken together, these projects can serve as a guide for producing philosophical work which both contributes to a mainstream disciplinary literature as well as informs cross-disciplinary, empirical literatures in the social sciences.

Downloaded on 1.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110612318-015/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button