Startseite Geschichte Subverting the “Master”–“Native” Relationship: Dragomans and Their Clients in the Fin-de-Siècle Middle East
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Subverting the “Master”–“Native” Relationship: Dragomans and Their Clients in the Fin-de-Siècle Middle East

  • Rachel Mairs und Maya Muratov
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
“Masters” and “Natives”
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch “Masters” and “Natives”

Abstract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, Mohammed Hassan Attwa, a dragoman and a guide, was just one among an army of people involved in the thriving tourist industry in Egypt. Affiliated with the Shepheard’s and Savoy Hotels - two high-end rival establishments located next to each other in central Cairo - Attwa had the opportunity to work for many distinguished guests. All that remains of his legacy nowadays is his carte de visite - boasting of “highest references” and “many years experience”. In addition, Attwa presents himself as a dahabeah conductor - promising his clients “excellent accommodations” and “special arrangements” for the tours along the Nile “by first class dahabeahs”. The antiquities of the Nile valley were naturally of great interest to his clients, and, like all dragomans, he will have had to assume some expertise. The inner side of this rather large and elaborate folding card contains a list of thirtyfive clients - all Anglophone, mostly from the United Kingdom and America - whose names (many of them were well known at the time) undoubtedly served as a further professional advertisement for Attwa. This card is published here for the first time. The tourist industry and archaeology in the nineteenth-century Middle East were intimately linked. Our study builds on recent work which restores a voice and agency to the locals who worked with archaeologists in the field. Using unpublished archival materials, we explore how dragomans and archaeologists both collaborated and clashed. Flinders Petrie banned visiting tourists from bringing their dragomans to his excavations, concerned about looting. Two individuals whose lives we have explored in our current research, the Syrian Solomon N. Negima and the Armenian Daniel Z. Noorian, had more complex relationships with their archaeological employers and colleagues. Negima conducted tourists to visit excavations and was acquainted with several foreign archaeologists. Noorian, who began his career working for Leonard Woolley, eventually became an antiquities dealer in New York.

Abstract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, Mohammed Hassan Attwa, a dragoman and a guide, was just one among an army of people involved in the thriving tourist industry in Egypt. Affiliated with the Shepheard’s and Savoy Hotels - two high-end rival establishments located next to each other in central Cairo - Attwa had the opportunity to work for many distinguished guests. All that remains of his legacy nowadays is his carte de visite - boasting of “highest references” and “many years experience”. In addition, Attwa presents himself as a dahabeah conductor - promising his clients “excellent accommodations” and “special arrangements” for the tours along the Nile “by first class dahabeahs”. The antiquities of the Nile valley were naturally of great interest to his clients, and, like all dragomans, he will have had to assume some expertise. The inner side of this rather large and elaborate folding card contains a list of thirtyfive clients - all Anglophone, mostly from the United Kingdom and America - whose names (many of them were well known at the time) undoubtedly served as a further professional advertisement for Attwa. This card is published here for the first time. The tourist industry and archaeology in the nineteenth-century Middle East were intimately linked. Our study builds on recent work which restores a voice and agency to the locals who worked with archaeologists in the field. Using unpublished archival materials, we explore how dragomans and archaeologists both collaborated and clashed. Flinders Petrie banned visiting tourists from bringing their dragomans to his excavations, concerned about looting. Two individuals whose lives we have explored in our current research, the Syrian Solomon N. Negima and the Armenian Daniel Z. Noorian, had more complex relationships with their archaeological employers and colleagues. Negima conducted tourists to visit excavations and was acquainted with several foreign archaeologists. Noorian, who began his career working for Leonard Woolley, eventually became an antiquities dealer in New York.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Frontmatter I
  2. Acknowledgements V
  3. Contents VII
  4. Note on Transliteration XI
  5. Preface 1
  6. Introduction 5
  7. Archaeology in the Time of Empires: Unequal Negotiations and Scientific Competition
  8. “Masters” Against “Natives”: Edward Daniel Clarke and the “Theft” of the Eleusinian “Goddess” 19
  9. Russian Archaeologists, Colonial Administrators, and the “Natives” of Turkestan: Revisiting the History of Archaeology in Central Asia 31
  10. The “Maîtres” of Archaeology in Eastern Turkestan: Divide et Impera 87
  11. “Master” / “Native”: Are There Winners? A Micro-History of Reciprocal and Non-Linear Relations
  12. Subverting the “Master”–“Native” Relationship: Dragomans and Their Clients in the Fin-de-Siècle Middle East 107
  13. In the Service of the Colonizer: Leon Barszczewski, Polish Officer in the Tsarist Army 121
  14. “The General and his Army”: Metropolitans and Locals on the Khorezmian Expedition 137
  15. Taming the Other’s Past: The Eurocentric Scientific Tools
  16. From the Emic to the Etic and Back Again: Archaeology, Orientalism, and Religion from Colonial Sri Lanka to Switzerland 177
  17. Legislation and the Study of the Past: The Archaeological Survey of India and Challenges of the Present 197
  18. Early Archaeology in a “Native State”: Khans, Officers, and Archaeologists in Swat (1895–1939), with a Digression on the 1950s 213
  19. The Forging of Myths: Heroic Clichés and the (Re-)Distribution of Roles
  20. Archaeologists in Soviet Literature 239
  21. Archaeology and the Archaeologist on Screen 255
  22. Reversal of Roles in Postcolonial and Neocolonial Contexts: From a Relation between “Masters” and “Subordinates” to “Partnership”?
  23. From Supervision to Independence in Archaeology: The Comparison of the Iranian and the Afghan Strategy 291
  24. The Postcolonial Rewriting of the Past in North and South Korea Following Independence (1950s–1960s) 307
  25. Excavating in Iran and Central Asia: Cooperation or Competition? 323
  26. Publishing an Archaeological Discovery astride the “North”–“South” Divide (On an Example from Central Asia) 343
  27. Role Reversal: Hindu “Ethno-Expertise” of Western Archaeological Materials 367
Heruntergeladen am 29.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110599466-006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen