Home Philosophy 3. Ethnologie und Anthropologie
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3. Ethnologie und Anthropologie

  • Christian Moser
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Linienwissen und Liniendenken
This chapter is in the book Linienwissen und Liniendenken

Abstract

Chapter 3, Ethnology and Anthropology, investigates the role assigned to lines and linearity in anthropological discourses between the 18th century and the present. In what fields of ethnological research do lines figure, either as tropes that regulate narratives of cultural evolution, or as constitutive schemes that help organize anthropological thinking? As a first step, the 18th-century prehistory of scientific anthropology is surveyed. By focusing on the example of Johann Gottfried Herder, the chapter demonstrates how heavily enlightenment theories of anthropogenesis rely on the guiding metaphor of linearization. The chapter goes on to concentrate on lines of progress and lines of descent, which play a major role in the evolutionary anthropology of the 19th century (Lewis Henry Morgan) as well as the structuralist anthropology of Claude Lévi-Strauss, but which have come under attack in recent innovative developments of the discipline (Tim Ingold). Subsequently, anthropological theories of the origin of art, which ascribe a foundational function to lines, are taken into account (Alois Riegl, Ernst Grosse, Franz Boas, Leo Frobenius). This is followed by a discussion of anthropological reflections on lines in the context of semiotics, systems of notation, and epistemic practices (Wilhelm Wundt, André Leroi-Gourhan, Bruno Latour, Tim Ingold). Finally, the chapter traces lines in anthropological approaches to the social construction of space (Arnold van Gennep, Claude Lévi-Strauss, André Leroi-Gourhan, Marc Augé, Tim Ingold).

Abstract

Chapter 3, Ethnology and Anthropology, investigates the role assigned to lines and linearity in anthropological discourses between the 18th century and the present. In what fields of ethnological research do lines figure, either as tropes that regulate narratives of cultural evolution, or as constitutive schemes that help organize anthropological thinking? As a first step, the 18th-century prehistory of scientific anthropology is surveyed. By focusing on the example of Johann Gottfried Herder, the chapter demonstrates how heavily enlightenment theories of anthropogenesis rely on the guiding metaphor of linearization. The chapter goes on to concentrate on lines of progress and lines of descent, which play a major role in the evolutionary anthropology of the 19th century (Lewis Henry Morgan) as well as the structuralist anthropology of Claude Lévi-Strauss, but which have come under attack in recent innovative developments of the discipline (Tim Ingold). Subsequently, anthropological theories of the origin of art, which ascribe a foundational function to lines, are taken into account (Alois Riegl, Ernst Grosse, Franz Boas, Leo Frobenius). This is followed by a discussion of anthropological reflections on lines in the context of semiotics, systems of notation, and epistemic practices (Wilhelm Wundt, André Leroi-Gourhan, Bruno Latour, Tim Ingold). Finally, the chapter traces lines in anthropological approaches to the social construction of space (Arnold van Gennep, Claude Lévi-Strauss, André Leroi-Gourhan, Marc Augé, Tim Ingold).

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110467949-004/html
Scroll to top button