Diese Publikation wird Ihnen präsentiert durch Paradigm Publishing Services
Penn State University Press
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert
Erfordert eine Authentifizierung
15 Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedy’s Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty Discourses in the Immigration Cases
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- Frontmatter i
- Contents vii
- Acknowledgments xi
- Introduction 1
-
Part 1 Judgment in Classical Rhetoric
- 1 Justice Kennedy and the Interpretation of Legal Texts: The Classical Background 13
- 2 Sex and Moral Pollution in the Rhetoric of Justice Kennedy 28
-
Part 2 Judgment in Stasis Theory
- 3 Justice Kennedy’s Definitional Construction of Gay Rights in Lawrence and Obergefell: Legal Rhetorical Analysis with the Interpretive Stases 45
- 4 Justice Kennedy, Natural Liberty, and Classical Stasis Theory: Advancing Free Speech with Rhetorical Knowledge and Interpretive Argumentation 61
- 5 Romer v. Evans: Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and the Rhetoric of Judging Well 77
-
Part 3 Judgment in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory
- 6 Constructing a Free Agent: “Good Judgment” in Justice Kennedy’s Lawrence v. Texas Opinion 95
- 7 Justice Kennedy and Natural Law Argumentation 110
- 8 Justice Kennedy, Federalism, and the Nonproduction of Rhetorical Knowledge 125
-
Part 4 Judgment and Justice Kennedy’s Ethos
- 9 Justice Kennedy’s Free Speech Optimism 141
- 10 Strongmen and Neurotics: Visible Struggle and the Construction of Judicial Ethos 155
- 11 The Anticlassification Topic and Equal-Liberty Template 170
-
Part 5 Justice Kennedy’s Misjudgments: Women, Race, and Immigrants
- 12 Performing a “View from Nowhere”: Justice Kennedy’s Denial of Embodied Knowledge 187
- 13 Women in Justice Kennedy’s Jurisprudence 201
- 14 Justice Kennedy’s Anticlassification Doctrine: Not Judging Well 216
- 15 Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedy’s Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty Discourses in the Immigration Cases 232
-
Part 6 Assessment
- 16 Rhetorical Vision and Judgment: Did Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Judge Well? 247
- List of Contributors 265
- Index of Cases 269
- Index of Names and Subjects 273
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- Frontmatter i
- Contents vii
- Acknowledgments xi
- Introduction 1
-
Part 1 Judgment in Classical Rhetoric
- 1 Justice Kennedy and the Interpretation of Legal Texts: The Classical Background 13
- 2 Sex and Moral Pollution in the Rhetoric of Justice Kennedy 28
-
Part 2 Judgment in Stasis Theory
- 3 Justice Kennedy’s Definitional Construction of Gay Rights in Lawrence and Obergefell: Legal Rhetorical Analysis with the Interpretive Stases 45
- 4 Justice Kennedy, Natural Liberty, and Classical Stasis Theory: Advancing Free Speech with Rhetorical Knowledge and Interpretive Argumentation 61
- 5 Romer v. Evans: Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and the Rhetoric of Judging Well 77
-
Part 3 Judgment in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory
- 6 Constructing a Free Agent: “Good Judgment” in Justice Kennedy’s Lawrence v. Texas Opinion 95
- 7 Justice Kennedy and Natural Law Argumentation 110
- 8 Justice Kennedy, Federalism, and the Nonproduction of Rhetorical Knowledge 125
-
Part 4 Judgment and Justice Kennedy’s Ethos
- 9 Justice Kennedy’s Free Speech Optimism 141
- 10 Strongmen and Neurotics: Visible Struggle and the Construction of Judicial Ethos 155
- 11 The Anticlassification Topic and Equal-Liberty Template 170
-
Part 5 Justice Kennedy’s Misjudgments: Women, Race, and Immigrants
- 12 Performing a “View from Nowhere”: Justice Kennedy’s Denial of Embodied Knowledge 187
- 13 Women in Justice Kennedy’s Jurisprudence 201
- 14 Justice Kennedy’s Anticlassification Doctrine: Not Judging Well 216
- 15 Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedy’s Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty Discourses in the Immigration Cases 232
-
Part 6 Assessment
- 16 Rhetorical Vision and Judgment: Did Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Judge Well? 247
- List of Contributors 265
- Index of Cases 269
- Index of Names and Subjects 273