Cold Cooperation: Biodevelopment and The Legal Landscape
-
Colby Rideout
Since the Bolshevik Revolution, Russian government has been involved in the development and weaponization of biological agents for offensive purposes. In 1972 the Soviet Union signed the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) banning the use, development, and possession of offensive biological weapons. But soon the world learned that the Soviets continued developing biological weapons in violation of the BWC. There are still many questions concerning whether Russia continues to dishonor its obligations under the BWC. This paper uses Russia as a case study to show that something needs to be done to ensure all BWC subscribing nations’ compliance with the BWC and then proposes a combination of measures aimed at improving international compliance.
©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Introduction: Volume 2 of the Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety & Biodefense Law
- Global Biosecurity and Intelligence Challenges in Policy and Law
- Endemic Disease in Afghanistan: How an Improved Biosecurity Framework Could Alleviate the Threat to U.S. Troops
- BioIntel: Leveraging Information to Prevent Biological Weapons Attacks
- International Health and Intelligence Gathering: One in the Same or Rival Factions?
- Cold Cooperation: Biodevelopment and The Legal Landscape
- Tug of War? A Jurisdictional Analysis of WHO and Interpol
- Regulatory Frameworks in Global Biosecurity Threats to Food and Water
- Public Water Supplies in the United States and the European Union: International Security Procedures and Vulnerabilities
- International Food Regulations: Susceptibility to Deliberate Contamination
- France and a Biosecurity Perspective
- International Bioterrorism Search and Seizure Issues: A Comparative Analysis of American and French Search and Seizure Law as it Relates to the Global War on Terror
- The Plague in Modern Times and the Role of Law
- Biological Weapons Convention Perspectives in Law and Social Sciences
- The Biological Weapons Convention: Creation and Problems with Enforcement
- A Survey of Priorities and Impediments for a Biosecurity Code of Conduct as a Confidence Building Measure for the Biological Weapons and Toxins Convention
Articles in the same Issue
- Introduction: Volume 2 of the Journal of Biosecurity, Biosafety & Biodefense Law
- Global Biosecurity and Intelligence Challenges in Policy and Law
- Endemic Disease in Afghanistan: How an Improved Biosecurity Framework Could Alleviate the Threat to U.S. Troops
- BioIntel: Leveraging Information to Prevent Biological Weapons Attacks
- International Health and Intelligence Gathering: One in the Same or Rival Factions?
- Cold Cooperation: Biodevelopment and The Legal Landscape
- Tug of War? A Jurisdictional Analysis of WHO and Interpol
- Regulatory Frameworks in Global Biosecurity Threats to Food and Water
- Public Water Supplies in the United States and the European Union: International Security Procedures and Vulnerabilities
- International Food Regulations: Susceptibility to Deliberate Contamination
- France and a Biosecurity Perspective
- International Bioterrorism Search and Seizure Issues: A Comparative Analysis of American and French Search and Seizure Law as it Relates to the Global War on Terror
- The Plague in Modern Times and the Role of Law
- Biological Weapons Convention Perspectives in Law and Social Sciences
- The Biological Weapons Convention: Creation and Problems with Enforcement
- A Survey of Priorities and Impediments for a Biosecurity Code of Conduct as a Confidence Building Measure for the Biological Weapons and Toxins Convention
