Home Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception

  • Keith Johnson
Published/Copyright: August 22, 2000

Abstract

The ‘hyperspace effect’ in vowel perception may be taken as evidence that adaptive dispersion is an active perceptual process. However, a previous study tested for adaptive dispersion in isolated vowel stimuli spoken in a voice unfamiliar to the listeners. The experiment reported in this paper addressed both of these potential concerns and found that both consonant context and talker familiarity modulate the hyperspace effect. However, the reductions induced by context and familiarity were slight. Listeners’ preferred perceptual spaces remained hyperarticulated relative to the production vowel space.


verified


References

1 Bradlow, A.R.: A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 97: 1916–1924 (1995).10.1121/1.412064Search in Google Scholar

2 Bradlow, A.R.: A perceptual comparison of the /i/-/e/ and /u/-/o/ contrasts in English and Spanish: universal and language-specific aspects. Phonetica 53: 55–85 (1996).10.1159/000262189Search in Google Scholar

3 Creelman, C.D.: Case of the unknown talker. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 29: 655 (1957).10.1121/1.1909003Search in Google Scholar

4 Green, K.P.; Tomiak, G.R.; Kuhl, P.K.: The encoding of rate and talker information during phonetic perception. Perception Psychophysics 59: 675–692 (1997).10.3758/BF03206015Search in Google Scholar

5 Halle, M.: The sound pattern of Russian (Mouton, The Hague 1959).Search in Google Scholar

6 Johnson, K.: Speech perception without speaker normalization: an exemplar model; in Johnson, Mullennix, Talker variability in speech processing, pp. 145–166 (Academic Press, New York 1997).Search in Google Scholar

7 Johnson, K.; Flemming, E.; Wright, R.: The hyperspace effect: phonetic targets are hyperarticulated. Language 69: 505–528 (1993).10.2307/416697Search in Google Scholar

8 Johnson, K.; Strand, E.A.; D’Imperio, M.: Auditory-visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. J. Phonet. 27: 359–384 (1999).10.1006/jpho.1999.0100Search in Google Scholar

9 Liljencrants, J.; Lindblom, B.: Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: the role of perceptual contrast. Language 48: 839–862 (1972).10.2307/411991Search in Google Scholar

10 Lindblom, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773–1781 (1963).10.1121/1.1918816Search in Google Scholar

11 Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory; in Hardcastle, Marchal, Speech production and speech modeling, pp. 403–439 (Kluwer, Dordrecht 1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Search in Google Scholar

12 Lindblom, B.; Engstrand, O.: In what sense is speech quantal? J. Phonet. 17: 107–121 (1989).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31516-5Search in Google Scholar

13 Lindblom, B.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 30: 693–703 (1967).Search in Google Scholar

14 Mullennix, J.W.; Pisoni, D.B.: Stimulus variability and processing dependencies in speech perception. Perception Psychophysics 47: 379–390 (1990).10.3758/BF03210878Search in Google Scholar

15 Mullennix, J.W.; Pisoni, D.B.; Martin, C.S.: Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 365–378 (1989).10.1121/1.397688Search in Google Scholar

16 Nygaard, L.C.; Sommers, M.S.; Pisoni, D.B.: Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychol. Sci. 5: 42–45 (1994).10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00612.xSearch in Google Scholar

17 Padgett, J.: Contrast dispersion and Russian palatalization; in Hume, Johnson, The role of speech perception phenomena in phonology (Academic Press, New York, in press).Search in Google Scholar

18 Stevens, K.N.; House, A.S.: Perturbation of vowel articulations by consonantal context: an acoustical study. J. Speech Hear. Res. 6: 111–128 (1963).10.1044/jshr.0602.111Search in Google Scholar

19 Walker, S.; Bruce, V.; O’Malley, C.: Facial identity and facial speech processing: familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect. Perception Psychophysics 59: 1124–1133 (1995).10.3758/BF03208369Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2000-08-22
Published in Print: 2000-12-01

© 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Special Section
  2. Title Page
  3. Foreword
  4. Acoustic Patterning of Speech Its Linguistic and Physiological Bases
  5. Investigating Unscripted Speech: Implications for Phonetics and Phonology
  6. Emotive Transforms
  7. The Source-Filter Frame of Prominence
  8. The C/D Model and Prosodic Control of Articulatory Behavior
  9. Diverse Acoustic Cues at Consonantal Landmarks
  10. Perceptual Processing
  11. Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’
  12. General Auditory Processes Contribute to Perceptual Accommodation of Coarticulation
  13. Adaptive Dispersion in Vowel Perception
  14. Language Acquisition as Complex Category Formation
  15. Biology of Communication and Motor Processes
  16. Singing Birds, Playing Cats, and Babbling Babies: Why Do They Do It?
  17. The Phonetic Potential of Nonhuman Vocal Tracts: Comparative Cineradiographic Observations of Vocalizing Animals
  18. Dynamic Simulation of Human Movement Using Large-Scale Models of the Body
  19. En Route to Adult Spoken Language / Language Development
  20. An Embodiment Perspective on the Acquisition of Speech Perception
  21. Speech to Infants as Hyperspeech: Knowledge-Driven Processes in Early Word Recognition
  22. The Construction of a First Phonology
  23. Auditory Constraints on Sound Structures
  24. Searching for an Auditory Description of Vowel Categories
  25. Commentary
  26. Imitation and the Emergence of Segments
  27. Deriving Speech from Nonspeech: A View from Ontogeny
  28. Paper
  29. Developmental Origins of Adult Phonology: The Interplay between Phonetic Emergents and the Evolutionary Adaptations of Sound Patterns
  30. Further Section
  31. Publications Björn Lindblom
  32. Index autorum Vol. 57, 2000
  33. Contents Vol. 57, 2000
Downloaded on 10.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1159/000028471/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button