Modeling and Perception of ‘Gesture Reduction’

References

1 d’Alessandro, C.; Castellengo, M.: The pitch of short duration vibrato tones. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 95: 1617–1630 (1994).10.1121/1.408548Search in Google Scholar

2 Badin, P.; Fant, G.: Notes on the vocal tract computations. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2/3, pp. 53–107 (1984).Search in Google Scholar

3 Beautemps, D.: Récupération des gestes de la parole à partir de trajectoires formantiques: identification de cibles vocaliques non atteintes et modèles pour les profils sagittaux des consonnes fricatives; thèse Institut National Polytechnique, Grenoble (1993).Search in Google Scholar

4 Browman, C.; Goldstein, L.: Towards an articulatory phonology; in Ewan, Anderson, Phonol. Yb., pp. 219–252 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1986).10.1017/S0952675700000658Search in Google Scholar

5 Brownlee, S.A.: The role of sentence stress in vowel reduction and formant undershoot: a study of lab speech and informal spontaneous speech; PhD thesis University of Texas, Austin (1996).Search in Google Scholar

6 Carré, R.; Chennoukh, S.; Divenyi, P.; Lindblom, B.: On the perceptual characteristics of ‘speech gestures’. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 96: S3326 (1994).10.1121/1.410724Search in Google Scholar

7 Carré, R.; Mody, M.: Prediction of Vowel and Consonant Place of Articulation. Proc. 3rd Meet. ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonol. SIGPHON 97, Madrid 1997, pp. 26–32.Search in Google Scholar

8 Carré, R.; Mrayati, M.: Vowel-vowel trajectories and region modeling. J. Phonet. 19: 433–443 (1991).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30334-1Search in Google Scholar

9 Chiba, T.; Kajiyama, M.: The vowel: its nature and structure (Tokyo-Kaiseikan Publishing Company, Tokyo 1941).Search in Google Scholar

10 Di Benedetto, M.G.: Frequency and time variations of the first formant: properties relevant to the perception of vowel height. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 86: 67–77 (1989).10.1121/1.398221Search in Google Scholar

11 Divenyi, P.; Lindblom, B.; Carré, R.: The role of transition velocity in the perception of V₁V₂ complexes. Proc. 13th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Stockholm 1995, pp. 258–261.Search in Google Scholar

12 Fant, G.: Speech sounds and features (MIT Press, Cambridge 1973).Search in Google Scholar

13 Fant, G.: Vocal tract area and length perturbations. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 1–14 (1975).Search in Google Scholar

14 Fowler, C.A.: Phonological and articulatory characteristics of spoken language. Haskins Lab. Status Rep. Speech Res., SR 109/110, pp. 1–12 (Haskins Laboratories, New Haven 1992).Search in Google Scholar

15 Gay, T.: Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 63: 223–230 (1978).10.1121/1.381717Search in Google Scholar

16 House, A.S.; Fairbanks, G.: The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 25: 105–113 (1953).10.1121/1.1906982Search in Google Scholar

17 Huang, C.B.: Perception of first and second formant frequency trajectories in vowels. Int. Congr. on Phonet. Sci., Tallinn 1987, pp. 194–197.Search in Google Scholar

18 Johnson, K.: Speaker perception without speaker normalization. An exemplar model; in Johnson, Mullennix, Talker variability in speech processing, pp. 145–165 (Academic Press, New York 1997).Search in Google Scholar

19 Kozhevnikov, V.A.; Chistovich, L.A.: Speech, articulation, and perception. JPRS-30543. NTIS (US Department of Commerce, 1965).Search in Google Scholar

20 Kuehn, D.P.; Moll, K.L.: A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. J. Phonet. 4: 303–320 (1976).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31257-4Search in Google Scholar

21 Kuhl, P.: Infants’ perception and representation of speech: development of a new theory. Proc. ICSLP ’92, Banff 1992, pp. 449–456.10.21437/ICSLP.1992-3Search in Google Scholar

22 Kuwabara, H.: An approach to normalization of coarticulation effects for vowels in connected speech. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 77: 686–694 (1985).10.1121/1.392337Search in Google Scholar

23 Lindblom, B.: Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 35: 1773–1781 (1963).10.1121/1.1918816Search in Google Scholar

24 Lindblom, B.: Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H and H theory; in Marchal, Hardcastle, Speech production and speech modelling, NATO ASI Series, pp. 403–439 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1990).10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16Search in Google Scholar

25 Lindblom, B.; Studdert-Kennedy, M.: On the role of formant transitions in vowel perception. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 42: 830–843 (1967).10.1121/1.1910655Search in Google Scholar

26 Lindgren, R.; Lindblom, B.: Reduction of vowel chaos. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2, pp. 1–4 (1996).Search in Google Scholar

27 Mattingly, I.G.: The global character of phonetic gesture. J. Phonet. 18: 445–452 (1990).10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30372-9Search in Google Scholar

28 Moore, B.C.J.; Sek, A.: Discrimination of frequency glides with superimposed random glides in level. J. acoust. Soc. Am., 104: 411–421 (1998).10.1121/1.423297Search in Google Scholar

29 Mrayati, M.; Carré, R.; Guérin, B.: Distinctive region and modes: a new theory of speech production. Speech Commun. 7: 257–286 (1988).10.1016/0167-6393(88)90073-8Search in Google Scholar

30 Mrayati, M.; Carré, R.; Guérin, B.: Distinctive regions and modes: articulatory-acoustic-phonetic aspects. A reply to Boë and Perrier comments. Speech Commun. 9: 231–238 (1990).10.1016/0167-6393(90)90059-ISearch in Google Scholar

31 Nord, L.: Acoustic studies of vowel reduction in Swedish. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 4, pp. 19–36 (1986).Search in Google Scholar

32 Peterson, G.E.; Barney, H.L.: Control methods used in the study of the vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 24: 175–184 (1952).10.1121/1.1906875Search in Google Scholar

33 Son, R.J.J.H. van: Vowel perception: a closer look at the literature. Proc. Inst. Phonet. Sci., Univ. Amsterdam 17: 33–64 (1993).Search in Google Scholar

34 Son, R.J.J.H. van; Pols, L.C.W.: Formant movements of Dutch vowels in a text, read at normal and fast rate. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 121–127 (1992).10.1121/1.404277Search in Google Scholar

35 Son, R.J.J.H. van; Pols, L.C.W.: Vowel identification as influenced by vowel duration and formant track shape. Proc. Eurospeech ’93, Berlin, pp. 285–288 (1993).Search in Google Scholar

36 Strange, W.: Dynamic specifications of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 85: 2135–2153 (1989).10.1121/1.397863Search in Google Scholar

37 Strange, W.; Bohn, O.S.: Dynamic specification of coarticulated German vowels: perceptual and acoustical studies. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 104: 488–504 (1998).10.1121/1.423299Search in Google Scholar

38 Strange, W.; Jenkins, J.J.; Johnson, T.L.: Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowel. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 74: 695–705 (1983).10.1121/1.389855Search in Google Scholar