Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Reply to Gebhard Kirchgässner
-
Lars P. Feld
Published/Copyright:
November 30, 2019
Abstract
In this reply to Kirchgässner, four issues are addressed: (1) the extent of double counting in attempts to reconcile estimates of the shadow economy based on the survey method and estimates based on the MIMIC (cum currency demand) approach, (2) advantages and disadvantages of the survey method, (3) of macro methods like the MIMIC approach and (4) the potential role of plausibility checks of estimates from the MIMIC approach with the survey method.
Published Online: 2019-11-30
Published in Print: 2017-02-01
© 2019 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- When a Door Closes, a Window Opens? Long-Term Labor Market Effects of Involuntary Separations
- Candidates’ Education and Turnout: Evidence from Italyn Municipal Elections
- von Thünen: Capital, Production Functions, Marginal Productivity Wages, and the Natural Wage
- On the Incentive Effects of Sample Size in Monitoring Agents – A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis
- On Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy
- Reply to Gebhard Kirchgässner
Articles in the same Issue
- When a Door Closes, a Window Opens? Long-Term Labor Market Effects of Involuntary Separations
- Candidates’ Education and Turnout: Evidence from Italyn Municipal Elections
- von Thünen: Capital, Production Functions, Marginal Productivity Wages, and the Natural Wage
- On the Incentive Effects of Sample Size in Monitoring Agents – A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis
- On Estimating the Size of the Shadow Economy
- Reply to Gebhard Kirchgässner
