Home Linguistics & Semiotics Intonation, bias and Greek NPIs
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Intonation, bias and Greek NPIs

A perception experiment
  • Stella Gryllia
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Above and Beyond the Segments
This chapter is in the book Above and Beyond the Segments

Abstract

This paper explores question bias in questions with negative polarity items (Ladusaw, 1979; Krifka, 1995; Giannakidou, 2011) by means of a perception experiment. For the purpose of the experiment the Greek emphatic and non-emphatic NPI kanenas ‘no-one/nobody, anyone/anybody’ are used. The experiment tests two hypotheses. The emphatic NPI in a negative polar question creates a bias for a negative answer. So listeners are expected to answer with a negative answer rather than with a positive answer when they listen to a question that contains an emphatic NPI (Hyp. 1). The non-emphatic NPI in a negative polar question creates no specific bias for an answer. Positive and negative answers are expected to be equally chosen by listeners (Hyp. 2). Both hypotheses were verified.

Abstract

This paper explores question bias in questions with negative polarity items (Ladusaw, 1979; Krifka, 1995; Giannakidou, 2011) by means of a perception experiment. For the purpose of the experiment the Greek emphatic and non-emphatic NPI kanenas ‘no-one/nobody, anyone/anybody’ are used. The experiment tests two hypotheses. The emphatic NPI in a negative polar question creates a bias for a negative answer. So listeners are expected to answer with a negative answer rather than with a positive answer when they listen to a question that contains an emphatic NPI (Hyp. 1). The non-emphatic NPI in a negative polar question creates no specific bias for an answer. Positive and negative answers are expected to be equally chosen by listeners (Hyp. 2). Both hypotheses were verified.

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents vii
  3. Foreword xi
  4. Tone and stress in North-West Indo-Aryan 1
  5. Whose voice is that? Challenges in forensic phonetics 14
  6. Pitch accent placement in Dutch as a second language 28
  7. The problems of adverbs in Zulu 42
  8. Meaningful grammar is binary, local, anti-symmetric, recursive and incomplete 60
  9. How prosody is both mandatory and optional 71
  10. No Stress Typology 83
  11. The effect of pause insertion on the intelligibility of Danish among Swedes 96
  12. Intonation, bias and Greek NPIs 109
  13. Information status and L2 prosody 120
  14. Does boundary tone production in whispered speech depend on its bearer? Exploring a case of tonal crowding in whisper 131
  15. The primacy of the weak in Carib prosody 144
  16. The effects of age and level of education on the ability of adult native speakers of Dutch to segment speech into words 152
  17. Doing grammatical semantics as if it were phonetics 165
  18. Phonetic aspects of polar questions in Sienese 174
  19. Etymological sub-lexicons constrain the graphematic solution space 189
  20. Do speakers try to distract attention from their speech errors? The prosody of self-repairs 203
  21. Field notes from a phonetician on Tundra Yukaghir orthography 218
  22. Cross-regional differences in the perception of fricative devoicing 230
  23. Evidence for three-level vowel length in Ageer Dinka 246
  24. Phonetic accounts of timed responses in syllable monitoring experiments 261
  25. The independent effects of prosodic structure and information status on tonal coarticulation 275
  26. The acoustics of English vowels in the speech of Dutch learners before and after pronunciation training 288
  27. The use of Chinese dialects 302
  28. Durational effects of phrasal stress 311
  29. The Laryngeal Class in RcvP and Voice phenomena in Dutch 323
  30. Affricates in English as a natural class 350
  31. Index 359
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/z.189.09gry/html
Scroll to top button