Home Linguistics & Semiotics No fixed boundaries
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

No fixed boundaries

  • Johan Myking
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP
This chapter is in the book Indeterminacy in Terminology and LSP

Abstract

Traditional terminology is currently being questioned and criticised, and this criticism tends to take central dichotomies as its point of departure. This article takes as its point of departure two theses, both of which address two dichotomies: a) there are no fixed boundaries between specialised communication and other forms of communication, and, consequently, b) there are no fixed boundaries between terms and the rest of vocabulary and phraseology. By combining a semasiological study of some of the central dichotomies of terminology with a historical approach, the paper argues that central dichotomies of terminology and LSP have been subject to a renegotiation that is not yet terminated. Some traditional dichotomies seem to have been recontextualised without being completely refuted.

Abstract

Traditional terminology is currently being questioned and criticised, and this criticism tends to take central dichotomies as its point of departure. This article takes as its point of departure two theses, both of which address two dichotomies: a) there are no fixed boundaries between specialised communication and other forms of communication, and, consequently, b) there are no fixed boundaries between terms and the rest of vocabulary and phraseology. By combining a semasiological study of some of the central dichotomies of terminology with a historical approach, the paper argues that central dichotomies of terminology and LSP have been subject to a renegotiation that is not yet terminated. Some traditional dichotomies seem to have been recontextualised without being completely refuted.

Downloaded on 9.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/tlrp.8.10myk/html
Scroll to top button