From perception of contraries to humorous incongruities
-
Carla Canestrari
Abstract
According to the cognitive approach to humour, the understanding of jokes implies the recognition of an incongruity followed by its resolution. Through our work, we aim to contribute to this strand of research by investigating the link between cognitive processes and the understanding of humour. In particular, we will explore the distinction between the three different types of contrariety (global, intermediate and additive) that has emerged from the research on the psychology of perception and is characterised by different perceptual evidence, and how it applies to the concept of incongruity. We will also discuss what a reading of humorous incongruity in terms of perceptual patterns may add to previous definitions of incongruity and how it helps to contribute to the further operationalisation thereof.
Abstract
According to the cognitive approach to humour, the understanding of jokes implies the recognition of an incongruity followed by its resolution. Through our work, we aim to contribute to this strand of research by investigating the link between cognitive processes and the understanding of humour. In particular, we will explore the distinction between the three different types of contrariety (global, intermediate and additive) that has emerged from the research on the psychology of perception and is characterised by different perceptual evidence, and how it applies to the concept of incongruity. We will also discuss what a reading of humorous incongruity in terms of perceptual patterns may add to previous definitions of incongruity and how it helps to contribute to the further operationalisation thereof.
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- A view on humour theory vii
-
I. New humour frameworks and extensions
- From perception of contraries to humorous incongruities 3
- Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humour 25
- Signals of humor 49
- Comic nescience 75
-
II. New theoretical issues in humour studies
- Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk 105
- Giving voice to the studio audience 145
- Negotiating humorous intent 179
- Perspective clashing as a humour mechanism 211
- Phrasemes, parodies and the art of timing 235
-
III. New theoretical approaches to established forms of humour
- Decoding encoded (im)politeness 263
- When does irony tickle the hearer? 289
- Strategies and tactics for ironic subversion 321
- Salience, accessibility, and humorous potential in the comprehension of garden path jokes 341
- Televised political satire 367
- “It’s not funny out of context!” 393
- Index 423
Kapitel in diesem Buch
- Prelim pages i
- Table of contents v
- A view on humour theory vii
-
I. New humour frameworks and extensions
- From perception of contraries to humorous incongruities 3
- Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humour 25
- Signals of humor 49
- Comic nescience 75
-
II. New theoretical issues in humour studies
- Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk 105
- Giving voice to the studio audience 145
- Negotiating humorous intent 179
- Perspective clashing as a humour mechanism 211
- Phrasemes, parodies and the art of timing 235
-
III. New theoretical approaches to established forms of humour
- Decoding encoded (im)politeness 263
- When does irony tickle the hearer? 289
- Strategies and tactics for ironic subversion 321
- Salience, accessibility, and humorous potential in the comprehension of garden path jokes 341
- Televised political satire 367
- “It’s not funny out of context!” 393
- Index 423
