Home Chapter 7. Vietnamese expletive between grammatical subject and subjectivity marker
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 7. Vietnamese expletive between grammatical subject and subjectivity marker

at the syntax-pragmatics (discourse) interface
  • Huy Linh Dao
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

In this paper, we undertake a systematic investigation of the peculiar behavior of the optional expletive subject pronoun expl in spoken Vietnamese. The first part of our study consists of an in-depth examination of its syntactic and semantic properties in comparison to those of its referential counterpart. From this overview, it appears that the distribution of expl is jointly determined by syntactic and discourse factors. We then critically appraise the recent analysis by Greco et al. (2018a, b), according to which expl imposes a specificity requirement on sentences containing it. We suggest to reinterpret this requirement as a corollary of the assessment by the speaker of a given state of affairs against her epistemic background. Pursuing the line of argumentation developed in Dao (2014) and integrating insights from Speas-Tenny’s syntactic approach to Evidentiality (Speas & Tenny 2003; Speas 2004; Tenny 2006), we argue that expl is best treated as an ego-evidential marker. We further show that expl does not intrinsically encode evidentiality but acquires its evidential import via syntactic processes.

Abstract

In this paper, we undertake a systematic investigation of the peculiar behavior of the optional expletive subject pronoun expl in spoken Vietnamese. The first part of our study consists of an in-depth examination of its syntactic and semantic properties in comparison to those of its referential counterpart. From this overview, it appears that the distribution of expl is jointly determined by syntactic and discourse factors. We then critically appraise the recent analysis by Greco et al. (2018a, b), according to which expl imposes a specificity requirement on sentences containing it. We suggest to reinterpret this requirement as a corollary of the assessment by the speaker of a given state of affairs against her epistemic background. Pursuing the line of argumentation developed in Dao (2014) and integrating insights from Speas-Tenny’s syntactic approach to Evidentiality (Speas & Tenny 2003; Speas 2004; Tenny 2006), we argue that expl is best treated as an ego-evidential marker. We further show that expl does not intrinsically encode evidentiality but acquires its evidential import via syntactic processes.

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.219.07dao/html
Scroll to top button