Home Linguistics & Semiotics How to avoid pitfalls in documenting endangered languages
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

How to avoid pitfalls in documenting endangered languages

  • Sarah G. Thomason
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Responses to Language Endangerment
This chapter is in the book Responses to Language Endangerment

Abstract

Conducting fieldwork on an endangered language resembles fieldwork projects on non-endangered languages in most respects, but there also some differences that require extra attention when one studies an endangered language in the field. This paper concentrates on the differences. It covers such topics as getting access to fluent native speakers and community approval for the research; data-collection techniques (a variety will be needed); individual variation, which can be much more problematic in an endangered language than in other languages; and dictionary-making procedures, which may require consultants to dig deep in their memories to come up with words they haven’t spoken or heard for many years.

Abstract

Conducting fieldwork on an endangered language resembles fieldwork projects on non-endangered languages in most respects, but there also some differences that require extra attention when one studies an endangered language in the field. This paper concentrates on the differences. It covers such topics as getting access to fluent native speakers and community approval for the research; data-collection techniques (a variety will be needed); individual variation, which can be much more problematic in an endangered language than in other languages; and dictionary-making procedures, which may require consultants to dig deep in their memories to come up with words they haven’t spoken or heard for many years.

Downloaded on 19.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.142.05tho/html
Scroll to top button