Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Lacking in Latvian: Case variation from a cognitive and constructional perspective
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Lacking in Latvian: Case variation from a cognitive and constructional perspective

  • Sturla Berg-Olsen
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This article examines two construction families used with the Latvian verb(pie)trūkt ‘lack, miss’, employing usage-based construction grammar and Cognitive Grammar. Focusing on type frequency, I conclude that the nom constructions, characterised by the lacking entity appearing in the nominative and showing verbal agreement, have a higher degree of entrenchment than the gen constructions, where the lacking entity is in the genitive and verbal agreement is absent. Although diachronic data indicate a long history of coexistence between the families, I hypothesise that if one of them were to be ousted, it would be the one with the lowest degree of entrenchment (cf. Barðdal 2001: Ch. 6). This is consistent with a larger shift involving the Latvian genitive and conforms with tendencies in other North European languages.

Abstract

This article examines two construction families used with the Latvian verb(pie)trūkt ‘lack, miss’, employing usage-based construction grammar and Cognitive Grammar. Focusing on type frequency, I conclude that the nom constructions, characterised by the lacking entity appearing in the nominative and showing verbal agreement, have a higher degree of entrenchment than the gen constructions, where the lacking entity is in the genitive and verbal agreement is absent. Although diachronic data indicate a long history of coexistence between the families, I hypothesise that if one of them were to be ousted, it would be the one with the lowest degree of entrenchment (cf. Barðdal 2001: Ch. 6). This is consistent with a larger shift involving the Latvian genitive and conforms with tendencies in other North European languages.

Kapitel in diesem Buch

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. List of contributors vii
  4. Introduction: The role of semantic, pragmatic and discourse factors in the development of case ix
  5. Part I. Semantically and aspectually motivated synchronic case variation
  6. Case variation in Gothic absolute constructions 3
  7. Some semantic and pragmatic aspects of object alternation in Early Vedic 23
  8. Part II. Discourse motivated subject marking
  9. The case of the shifty ergative marker: A pragmatic shift in the ergative marker of one Australian mixed language 59
  10. How useful is case morphology? The loss of the Old French two-case system within a theory of Preferred Argument structure 93
  11. Part III. Reduction or expansion of case marker distribution
  12. The development of case in Germanic 123
  13. A usage-based approach to change: Old Russian possessive constructions 161
  14. Lacking in Latvian: Case variation from a cognitive and constructional perspective 181
  15. Verb classes and dative objects in Insular Scandinavian 203
  16. Transitive adjectives in Japanese 225
  17. Part IV. Case syncretism motivated by syntax, semantics or language contact
  18. Patterns of development, patterns of syncretism of relational morphology in the Bodic languages 261
  19. The evolution of local cases and their grammatical equivalent in Greek and Latin 283
  20. Argument structure and alignment variations and changes in Late Latin 307
  21. Case loss in Texas German: The influence of semantic and pragmatic factors 347
  22. Part V. Case splits motivated by pragmatics, metonymy and subjectification
  23. Semantic role to new information in Meithei 377
  24. From less personal to more personal: Subjectification of ni -marked NPs in Japanese discourse 401
  25. Author index 423
  26. Subject index 427
Heruntergeladen am 27.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.108.11ber/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen