Home Linguistics & Semiotics Ditransitive constructions: Towards a new Role and Reference Grammar account?
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Ditransitive constructions: Towards a new Role and Reference Grammar account?

  • Martin Haspelmath
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
To Publisher Page
Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface
This chapter is in the book Investigations of the Syntax–Semantics–Pragmatics Interface

Abstract

This paper reviews some of basic argument marking properties of ditransitive constructions and asks how various syntactic frameworks deal with them. In particular, I critically examine two accounts within Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). I lay out a basic typology of three alignment types: indirective alignment, neutral alignment, and secundative alignment. Since the latter is not common in the most widely studied languages, theoretical frameworks have typically had problems with it, including the earlier account within RRG. I argue that the three ditransitive alignment types are parallel to the three monotransitive alignment types (accusative, neutral, ergative), and that it is worth exploring an alternative RRG account that operates with two additional macroroles, R and T, which function much like A and U. In this paper, I will examine the treatment of ditransitive constructions in Role and Reference Grammar and compare it to the perspective on ditransitives that I have developed in earlier work (Haspelmath 2005a, 2007a), as well as to some other formal grammatical frameworks. I will conclude by proposing a fairly radical revision of the standard treatment of ditransitive constructions in rrg (Guerrero & Van Valin 2004; Van Valin 2007).

Abstract

This paper reviews some of basic argument marking properties of ditransitive constructions and asks how various syntactic frameworks deal with them. In particular, I critically examine two accounts within Role and Reference Grammar (RRG). I lay out a basic typology of three alignment types: indirective alignment, neutral alignment, and secundative alignment. Since the latter is not common in the most widely studied languages, theoretical frameworks have typically had problems with it, including the earlier account within RRG. I argue that the three ditransitive alignment types are parallel to the three monotransitive alignment types (accusative, neutral, ergative), and that it is worth exploring an alternative RRG account that operates with two additional macroroles, R and T, which function much like A and U. In this paper, I will examine the treatment of ditransitive constructions in Role and Reference Grammar and compare it to the perspective on ditransitives that I have developed in earlier work (Haspelmath 2005a, 2007a), as well as to some other formal grammatical frameworks. I will conclude by proposing a fairly radical revision of the standard treatment of ditransitive constructions in rrg (Guerrero & Van Valin 2004; Van Valin 2007).

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. List of contributors ix
  4. Part I. Introduction by the Editor
  5. Editor's introduction xv
  6. Part II. Verbs, argument structure and transitivity
  7. "Saying" verbs in Spanish 3
  8. Split intransitivity in Japanese revisited 23
  9. Reintroducing inverse constructions in Japanese 37
  10. Transitivity in Kabardian 59
  11. Ditransitive constructions: Towards a new Role and Reference Grammar account? 75
  12. Fluid transitivity and generalized semantic roles 101
  13. Part III. Syntactic and morphological categories
  14. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology 119
  15. Modality in RRG 147
  16. RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar 161
  17. “Floating plurals”, prodrop and agreement – an optimality-based RRG approach 179
  18. Where is the precore slot? Mapping the layered structure of the clause and German sentence topology 203
  19. Part IV. Syntax, pragmatics and prosody
  20. A prosodic projection for Role and Reference Grammar 227
  21. Is Role and Reference Grammar an adequate grammatical theory for punctuation? 245
  22. The interplay of focus structure and syntax 263
  23. How missing is the missing verb? 285
  24. Predication and reference in specificational sentences – functions of English noun phrases 305
  25. Part V. The analysis of complex sentences
  26. Alternative expressions of 'want' complements 321
  27. An RRG approach to French complementation patterns 337
  28. Complementizer-gap phenomena 359
  29. Wari’ Intentional State Constructions 381
  30. Part VI. Neurolinguistic and computational aspects of RRG
  31. Unmarked transitivity 413
  32. Parsing for Role and Reference Grammar 435
  33. A Role-Lexical Module (RLM) for Biblical Hebrew 455
  34. Index of languages 479
  35. Index of subjects 481
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.105.09has

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. List of contributors ix
  4. Part I. Introduction by the Editor
  5. Editor's introduction xv
  6. Part II. Verbs, argument structure and transitivity
  7. "Saying" verbs in Spanish 3
  8. Split intransitivity in Japanese revisited 23
  9. Reintroducing inverse constructions in Japanese 37
  10. Transitivity in Kabardian 59
  11. Ditransitive constructions: Towards a new Role and Reference Grammar account? 75
  12. Fluid transitivity and generalized semantic roles 101
  13. Part III. Syntactic and morphological categories
  14. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology 119
  15. Modality in RRG 147
  16. RPs and the nature of lexical and syntactic categories in Role and Reference Grammar 161
  17. “Floating plurals”, prodrop and agreement – an optimality-based RRG approach 179
  18. Where is the precore slot? Mapping the layered structure of the clause and German sentence topology 203
  19. Part IV. Syntax, pragmatics and prosody
  20. A prosodic projection for Role and Reference Grammar 227
  21. Is Role and Reference Grammar an adequate grammatical theory for punctuation? 245
  22. The interplay of focus structure and syntax 263
  23. How missing is the missing verb? 285
  24. Predication and reference in specificational sentences – functions of English noun phrases 305
  25. Part V. The analysis of complex sentences
  26. Alternative expressions of 'want' complements 321
  27. An RRG approach to French complementation patterns 337
  28. Complementizer-gap phenomena 359
  29. Wari’ Intentional State Constructions 381
  30. Part VI. Neurolinguistic and computational aspects of RRG
  31. Unmarked transitivity 413
  32. Parsing for Role and Reference Grammar 435
  33. A Role-Lexical Module (RLM) for Biblical Hebrew 455
  34. Index of languages 479
  35. Index of subjects 481
Sign up now to receive a 20% welcome discount
Institutional Access
How does access work?
Have an idea on how to improve our website?
Please write us.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Downloaded on 12.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/slcs.105.09has/html
Scroll to top button