Startseite Allgemein Chinese comparatives
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chinese comparatives

Commentary on clausal vs. phrasal analyses
  • Jo-wang Lin
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This article aims to make a contribution to the recent debate between the phrasal and clausal analyses of Chinese comparatives, focusing on Lin (2009) for the phrasal approach and Liu (2011, 2014), Hsieh (2017) and Erlewine (2018) for the clausal approach. I show that problems such as lack of independent support for the rule of backward predicate deletion, subcomparatives, embedded standards and verbal comparatives remain difficult challenges to the new clausal analyses and that counter-arguments against the phrasal approach do not necessarily hold. To the contrary, a fine tuning of Lin’s original phrasal analysis of bi not only avoids an important criticism made by Liu (2011) but can be extended to analyze verbal-comparatives in a way that the clausal analyses cannot.

Abstract

This article aims to make a contribution to the recent debate between the phrasal and clausal analyses of Chinese comparatives, focusing on Lin (2009) for the phrasal approach and Liu (2011, 2014), Hsieh (2017) and Erlewine (2018) for the clausal approach. I show that problems such as lack of independent support for the rule of backward predicate deletion, subcomparatives, embedded standards and verbal comparatives remain difficult challenges to the new clausal analyses and that counter-arguments against the phrasal approach do not necessarily hold. To the contrary, a fine tuning of Lin’s original phrasal analysis of bi not only avoids an important criticism made by Liu (2011) but can be extended to analyze verbal-comparatives in a way that the clausal analyses cannot.

Heruntergeladen am 14.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.272.09lin/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen