Home Linguistics & Semiotics Syntactic (dis)agreement is not semantic agreement
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Syntactic (dis)agreement is not semantic agreement

  • Gabi Danon
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Advances in the Syntax of DPs
This chapter is in the book Advances in the Syntax of DPs

Abstract

This chapter looks at two cases where subject agreement in Hebrew does not follow the morphosyntactic (phi) features of the subject: singular agreement with plural subjects, and plural agreement with singular group-denoting subjects. The paper argues that there are important differences between these two cases; in particular, it is argued that the former is not agreement but lack of agreement, whereas the latter involves (syntactic) agreement. Lack of agreement is tied to constraints on thematic role assignment. Neither case poses a real problem to current syntactic models of agreement.

Abstract

This chapter looks at two cases where subject agreement in Hebrew does not follow the morphosyntactic (phi) features of the subject: singular agreement with plural subjects, and plural agreement with singular group-denoting subjects. The paper argues that there are important differences between these two cases; in particular, it is argued that the former is not agreement but lack of agreement, whereas the latter involves (syntactic) agreement. Lack of agreement is tied to constraints on thematic role assignment. Neither case poses a real problem to current syntactic models of agreement.

Downloaded on 13.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/la.217.04dan/html
Scroll to top button