Chapters in this book

1. Prelim pages i
2. Table of contents v
3. Introduction 1
4. Part I. Forms and conceptions of argumentation
5. 1. “The issue” in argumentative practice and theory 11
6. 2. Hearing is believing 29
7. 3. Let’s talk 43
8. 4. Indicators of dissociation 53
9. 5. A collaborative model of argumentation in dyadic problem-solving interactions 69
10. 6. The argumentative dimension of discourse 87
11. 7. Designing premises 99
12. 8. On the pragmatics of argumentative discourse 115
13. 9. From argument analysis to cultural keywords (and back again) 125
14. Part II. Empirical studies of argumentative practice
15. 10. The accusation of amalgame as a meta-argumentative refutation 145
16. 11. Constructing the (imagined) antagonist in advertising argumentation 163
17. 12. Competing demands, multiple ideals, and the structure of argumentation practices 181
18. 13. Arguments of victims 197
19. 14. Coductive and abductive foundations for sentimental arguments in politics 215
20. 15. Reparations or separation? 231
21. 16. Discursive collisions 251
22. 17. Aesthetic arguments and civil society 267
23. 18. The use of arguments from perceived opposition in U.S. terrorism policy 285
24. 19. How could official speakers communicate reasonably with their king? 305
25. 20. Argument density and argument diversity in the license applications of French provincial printers, 1669–1781 321
26. 21. Inventional capacity 337
27. 22. The conventional validity of the pragma-dialectal freedom rule 349
28. Index 367