Startseite Philosophie Chapter 8. A historical controversy about politeness and public argument
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 8. A historical controversy about politeness and public argument

The dispute about fashion between Melchiorre Gioja and Antonio Rosmini
  • Francesca Saltamacchia und Andrea Rocci
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

This article presents the Nineteenth-Century dispute arising from the criticism that the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini expressed against the arguments that the statesman Melchiorre Gioja supported in defense of fashion in his Apologia della moda ‘Apology of Fashion’ (1822) and against the utilitarian ideology that permeates the text. Gioja’s aggressive answer (in 1827) leads Rosmini to write a treatise on polite manners writers must have in public debate, thus offering an interesting ethical treatise. We aim to analyze the controversy adopting an interdisciplinary approach that investigates metapragmatic evaluative comments from the point of view of argumentation in order to reconstruct the argumentative justification behind each evaluation of (im)politeness and to show the principles defended by the disputants.

Abstract

This article presents the Nineteenth-Century dispute arising from the criticism that the Italian philosopher Antonio Rosmini expressed against the arguments that the statesman Melchiorre Gioja supported in defense of fashion in his Apologia della moda ‘Apology of Fashion’ (1822) and against the utilitarian ideology that permeates the text. Gioja’s aggressive answer (in 1827) leads Rosmini to write a treatise on polite manners writers must have in public debate, thus offering an interesting ethical treatise. We aim to analyze the controversy adopting an interdisciplinary approach that investigates metapragmatic evaluative comments from the point of view of argumentation in order to reconstruct the argumentative justification behind each evaluation of (im)politeness and to show the principles defended by the disputants.

Heruntergeladen am 24.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cvs.16.08sal/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen