Home Philosophy Chapter 2. Locke’s and Leibniz’s virtual debate over Of our knowledge of the existence of God
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 2. Locke’s and Leibniz’s virtual debate over Of our knowledge of the existence of God

  • Kuti Shoham
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Controversies in the Contemporary World
This chapter is in the book Controversies in the Contemporary World

Abstract

The paper tries to reconstruct a possible polemical dialog between Locke and Leibniz over Of our knowledge of the existence of God, which is the title of Chapter 10, book 4, of the Essay and the New Essays. God’s existence is crucial to Leibniz’s metaphysics as well as to Locke’s philosophical enterprise, however, Locke is a kind of a tabula-rasa empiricist and Leibniz is a kind of a rationalist, therefore any a priori argument will not gain their mutual consent. Furthermore, because the former is a kind of realist whereas the latter holds a kind of an anti-realist ‘no-windows-point-of-view’ of the world, any a posteriori argument will eventually likely fail too.

Abstract

The paper tries to reconstruct a possible polemical dialog between Locke and Leibniz over Of our knowledge of the existence of God, which is the title of Chapter 10, book 4, of the Essay and the New Essays. God’s existence is crucial to Leibniz’s metaphysics as well as to Locke’s philosophical enterprise, however, Locke is a kind of a tabula-rasa empiricist and Leibniz is a kind of a rationalist, therefore any a priori argument will not gain their mutual consent. Furthermore, because the former is a kind of realist whereas the latter holds a kind of an anti-realist ‘no-windows-point-of-view’ of the world, any a posteriori argument will eventually likely fail too.

Downloaded on 18.2.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cvs.15.03sho/html
Scroll to top button