Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Chapter 3. Focus fronting vs. wh -movement
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chapter 3. Focus fronting vs. wh -movement

Evidence from Sardinian
  • Silvio Cruschina
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract

It is commonly held that focus fronting exhibits similar properties to wh-movement. The syntactic parallelism between the two types of movement has been supported by the semantic analyses of wh-questions that assume that when wh-words function as interrogative operators, they are inherently focal. The main goal of this paper is to challenge this highly attractive picture of the relationship between wh-words, focus, and movement, and to claim that wh-phrases are not inherently focal. The results of a prosodic production experiment on the distribution of the nuclear pitch accent in Sardinian wh-questions, together with the syntactic properties related to the asymmetry between direct and indirect wh-questions, form the empirical basis of this study.

Abstract

It is commonly held that focus fronting exhibits similar properties to wh-movement. The syntactic parallelism between the two types of movement has been supported by the semantic analyses of wh-questions that assume that when wh-words function as interrogative operators, they are inherently focal. The main goal of this paper is to challenge this highly attractive picture of the relationship between wh-words, focus, and movement, and to claim that wh-phrases are not inherently focal. The results of a prosodic production experiment on the distribution of the nuclear pitch accent in Sardinian wh-questions, together with the syntactic properties related to the asymmetry between direct and indirect wh-questions, form the empirical basis of this study.

Heruntergeladen am 29.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.357.03cru/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen