Home Chapter 18. A short history of phonology in America
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 18. A short history of phonology in America

Plus c’est la même chose, plus ça change
  • Stephen R. Anderson
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
All Things Morphology
This chapter is in the book All Things Morphology

Abstract

Although awareness of a difference between the study of the sound patterns of particular languages and the study of the language-independent capacity of humans to produce and perceive sound existed in European and American thought in the early years of the twentieth century, a clear enunciation of the distinction between phonology and phonetics is due to Otto Jespersen in 1924. As phonology became established as a coherent object of inquiry, two themes can be identified in theorizing about it: first, the question of whether phonological structure is in the mind, as an aspect of human cognition, or only a set of facts about the external data of language; and second, the question of whether there are valid universals of phonological structure. These issues are traced across the past century in the work of American linguists. An additional factor identifiable in historical shifts in theoretical perspective is somewhat less principled: as discussion of fundamental issues becomes more technical and relevant data harder to identify, students and scholars looking for productive research topics tend to abandon previous frameworks for others in a search for lower hanging fruit without necessarily having resolved the earlier questions.

Abstract

Although awareness of a difference between the study of the sound patterns of particular languages and the study of the language-independent capacity of humans to produce and perceive sound existed in European and American thought in the early years of the twentieth century, a clear enunciation of the distinction between phonology and phonetics is due to Otto Jespersen in 1924. As phonology became established as a coherent object of inquiry, two themes can be identified in theorizing about it: first, the question of whether phonological structure is in the mind, as an aspect of human cognition, or only a set of facts about the external data of language; and second, the question of whether there are valid universals of phonological structure. These issues are traced across the past century in the work of American linguists. An additional factor identifiable in historical shifts in theoretical perspective is somewhat less principled: as discussion of fundamental issues becomes more technical and relevant data harder to identify, students and scholars looking for productive research topics tend to abandon previous frameworks for others in a search for lower hanging fruit without necessarily having resolved the earlier questions.

Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.353.18and/html
Scroll to top button