Home Chapter 2. Making sense of morphology
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Chapter 2. Making sense of morphology

Foxes, hedgehogs and a calculus of infinitesimals
  • Farrell Ackerman
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
All Things Morphology
This chapter is in the book All Things Morphology

Abstract

Aronoff (2016) argues for the value of interpreting different approaches to the analysis of morphology as reflecting the sensibilities of foxes and hedgehogs as characterized in Berlin (1997). It is argued that Berlin also provides a way to go beyond these oppositional sensibilities and the morphological theories they develop by exploring a complex systems perspective on morphological organization of the sort adumbrated by certain late 19th century and early 20th century linguists: systems that arise from the dynamic co-activity of surprisingly many factors. The kind of view they envisioned is now quantitatively and computationally practicable and can benefit from research on complex behaviors within the developmental sciences. A view of this sort is motivated by two types of empirical evidence, one concerning implicative paradigm organization in Māori and Baale, the other concerning the dynamic relation between diachrony and synchrony as attested in Mari and Beserman Udmurt.

Abstract

Aronoff (2016) argues for the value of interpreting different approaches to the analysis of morphology as reflecting the sensibilities of foxes and hedgehogs as characterized in Berlin (1997). It is argued that Berlin also provides a way to go beyond these oppositional sensibilities and the morphological theories they develop by exploring a complex systems perspective on morphological organization of the sort adumbrated by certain late 19th century and early 20th century linguists: systems that arise from the dynamic co-activity of surprisingly many factors. The kind of view they envisioned is now quantitatively and computationally practicable and can benefit from research on complex behaviors within the developmental sciences. A view of this sort is motivated by two types of empirical evidence, one concerning implicative paradigm organization in Māori and Baale, the other concerning the dynamic relation between diachrony and synchrony as attested in Mari and Beserman Udmurt.

Downloaded on 9.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.353.02ack/html
Scroll to top button