Home General Interest Dative possessor in ditransitive Spanish predication, in diachronic perspective
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dative possessor in ditransitive Spanish predication, in diachronic perspective

  • Rosa María Ortiz Ciscomani
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Historical Linguistics 2017
This chapter is in the book Historical Linguistics 2017

Abstract

This paper analyses the diachronic behavior (12th to 20th centuries) of the ditransitive predications, with Direct Object (DO) and Indirect Object (IO), coded by Noun Phrases in Spanish. The analysis accounts for the properties of those participants, possessor and possessed respectively, and the verbs in the constructions. The analytic approach assumes that transitivity is a scalar phenomenon, without distinction between actantial and non-actantial dative. The possessive dative is an IO that refers to the possessor of the DO, while the ditransitive construction is an extension of the prototypical ditransitive. Our claim is that the construction i) gives relevance to the possessor over the possessed, and ii) shows that diachronically the DO has lexically diversified from concrete to non-concrete and animate entities, especially from the 16th century onwards.

Abstract

This paper analyses the diachronic behavior (12th to 20th centuries) of the ditransitive predications, with Direct Object (DO) and Indirect Object (IO), coded by Noun Phrases in Spanish. The analysis accounts for the properties of those participants, possessor and possessed respectively, and the verbs in the constructions. The analytic approach assumes that transitivity is a scalar phenomenon, without distinction between actantial and non-actantial dative. The possessive dative is an IO that refers to the possessor of the DO, while the ditransitive construction is an extension of the prototypical ditransitive. Our claim is that the construction i) gives relevance to the possessor over the possessed, and ii) shows that diachronically the DO has lexically diversified from concrete to non-concrete and animate entities, especially from the 16th century onwards.

Chapters in this book

  1. Prelim pages i
  2. Table of contents v
  3. Foreword & Acknowledgements ix
  4. Introduction 1
  5. Part I. Case & argument structure
  6. Strategies for aligning syntactic roles and case marking with semantic properties 9
  7. Criteria for subjecthood and non-canonical subjects in Classical Greek 29
  8. Parallel syncretism in early Indo-European 49
  9. Dative possessor in ditransitive Spanish predication, in diachronic perspective 65
  10. ‘Liking’ constructions in Spanish 81
  11. Part II. Alignment & Diathesis
  12. The actualization of new voice patterns in Romance 109
  13. Ergative from passive in Proto-Basque 143
  14. Part III. Patterns, paradigms, & restructuring
  15. Synchrony, diachrony, and indexicality 163
  16. Ablaut pattern extension as partial regularization strategy in German and Luxembourgish 183
  17. Remotivating inflectional classes 205
  18. From noun to quantifier 229
  19. Part IV. Grammaticalization & construction grammar
  20. Old French si , grammaticalisation, and the interconnectedness of change 253
  21. The rise of the analytic Perfect aspect in the West Iranian languages 273
  22. On the grammaticalization of the -(v)ši- resultative in North Slavic 293
  23. Atomizing linguistic change 317
  24. Part V. Corpus linguistics & morphosyntax
  25. The rich get richer 343
  26. Expletives in Icelandic 363
  27. Part VI. Languages in contact
  28. Contact and change in Neo-Aramaic dialects 387
  29. Copying of argument structure 409
  30. Contact-induced change and the phonemicization of the vowel /ɑ/ in Quảng Nam Vietnamese 431
  31. The future markers in Palestinian Arabic: 453
  32. Neuters to none 473
  33. Index 489
  34. Languages & language families 493
Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.350.04ort/html
Scroll to top button