Home Linguistics & Semiotics Being exacting about exapting
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Being exacting about exapting

An exaptation omnibus
  • Brian D. Joseph
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Exaptation and Language Change
This chapter is in the book Exaptation and Language Change

Abstract

For historical linguists, exaptation is an attractive notion, offering an overt link with biological evolution. Nonetheless, one can ask whether it represents something substantive about linguistic change or is merely an appealing metaphor. I critically assess exaptation, using case studies suggesting that speakers in crafting new “grammar” simply make use of material on hand. Whether it is “junk” (Lass 1990) or not is immaterial to the speaker; what matters is a model’s availability, often a very “localised” one. Through these examples, I argue that “exaptation” reduces to regular and well-understood processes of diachronic morphology, particularly analogy, not limited to any component of grammar. The material forming the model for innovation can be highly restricted and can itself be an irregular bit of the grammar. Similarly, any parallels with “grammaticalization” derive from these developments all being ways that speakers creatively make connections among elements in their language and act on them.

Abstract

For historical linguists, exaptation is an attractive notion, offering an overt link with biological evolution. Nonetheless, one can ask whether it represents something substantive about linguistic change or is merely an appealing metaphor. I critically assess exaptation, using case studies suggesting that speakers in crafting new “grammar” simply make use of material on hand. Whether it is “junk” (Lass 1990) or not is immaterial to the speaker; what matters is a model’s availability, often a very “localised” one. Through these examples, I argue that “exaptation” reduces to regular and well-understood processes of diachronic morphology, particularly analogy, not limited to any component of grammar. The material forming the model for innovation can be highly restricted and can itself be an irregular bit of the grammar. Similarly, any parallels with “grammaticalization” derive from these developments all being ways that speakers creatively make connections among elements in their language and act on them.

Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.336.02jos/html
Scroll to top button