Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik The argument indexing of early Austronesian verbs
Kapitel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The argument indexing of early Austronesian verbs

A reconstructional myth?
  • Malcolm D. Ross
Weitere Titel anzeigen von John Benjamins Publishing Company
Historical Linguistics 2013
Ein Kapitel aus dem Buch Historical Linguistics 2013

Abstract

This paper re-examines the Proto Austronesian (PAn) split-clitic construction, which has had a considerable influence on the reconstruction of Austronesian morphosyntactic history, suggests that it is a myth, and proposes alternative reconstructions, on the basis of data from Austronesian languages of Taiwan. At the same time the paper exemplifies and reinforces the observation by scholars of historical morphosyntax that cognate constructions across languages need to be identified not only on the basis of syntactic similarity but also on the basis of cognate morphology. Without the latter, there is no strong evidence of cognacy, as similar syntax may occur through parallel development, chance or contact.

Abstract

This paper re-examines the Proto Austronesian (PAn) split-clitic construction, which has had a considerable influence on the reconstruction of Austronesian morphosyntactic history, suggests that it is a myth, and proposes alternative reconstructions, on the basis of data from Austronesian languages of Taiwan. At the same time the paper exemplifies and reinforces the observation by scholars of historical morphosyntax that cognate constructions across languages need to be identified not only on the basis of syntactic similarity but also on the basis of cognate morphology. Without the latter, there is no strong evidence of cognacy, as similar syntax may occur through parallel development, chance or contact.

Heruntergeladen am 21.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.334.14ros/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen