Home Linguistics & Semiotics The argument indexing of early Austronesian verbs
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The argument indexing of early Austronesian verbs

A reconstructional myth?
  • Malcolm D. Ross
View more publications by John Benjamins Publishing Company
Historical Linguistics 2013
This chapter is in the book Historical Linguistics 2013

Abstract

This paper re-examines the Proto Austronesian (PAn) split-clitic construction, which has had a considerable influence on the reconstruction of Austronesian morphosyntactic history, suggests that it is a myth, and proposes alternative reconstructions, on the basis of data from Austronesian languages of Taiwan. At the same time the paper exemplifies and reinforces the observation by scholars of historical morphosyntax that cognate constructions across languages need to be identified not only on the basis of syntactic similarity but also on the basis of cognate morphology. Without the latter, there is no strong evidence of cognacy, as similar syntax may occur through parallel development, chance or contact.

Abstract

This paper re-examines the Proto Austronesian (PAn) split-clitic construction, which has had a considerable influence on the reconstruction of Austronesian morphosyntactic history, suggests that it is a myth, and proposes alternative reconstructions, on the basis of data from Austronesian languages of Taiwan. At the same time the paper exemplifies and reinforces the observation by scholars of historical morphosyntax that cognate constructions across languages need to be identified not only on the basis of syntactic similarity but also on the basis of cognate morphology. Without the latter, there is no strong evidence of cognacy, as similar syntax may occur through parallel development, chance or contact.

Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1075/cilt.334.14ros/html
Scroll to top button