Article Publicly Available

The effects of a brief educational intervention on medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain

  • EMAIL logo , and
Published/Copyright: July 1, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background and aims

Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain (LBP) can significantly impact a health care provider’s clinical decision making. Several studies have investigated interventions designed to change practitioner attitudes and beliefs towards LBP, however no such studies involving medical students have been identified.

Methods

This study explored medical students ‚ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP before and after a brief educational intervention on LBP. Responses from medical students (n = 93) were evaluated before and after a 15-min educational video on back pain. The intervention was developed using Camtasia™ video editor and screen recorder. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs were measured using the “Modified Back Beliefs Questionnaire”, with items from two previously reported questionnaires on back beliefs. The questionnaire asks participants to indicate their agreement with statements about LBP on a 5-point Likert scale. Preferred responses were based on guidelines for the evidence-based management of LBP. The primary analysis evaluated total score on the nine-inevitability items of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (“inevitability score”).

Results

Following the brief intervention there was a significant improvement in the inevitability score (post-workshop mean [SD] 20.8 [4.9] vs pre-workshop mean [SD] 26.9 [4.2]; mean difference (MD) 6.1, p < 0.001; lower score more favourable 1) and large improvements in the proportion of students providing correct responses to items on activity (pre: 49% vs post: 79%), bed rest (41% vs 75%), imaging (44% vs 74%) and recovery (25% vs 66%).

Conclusions

After watching the educational video students’ knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards LBP improved and thus aligned more closely with evidence-based guidelines.

Implications

Medical doctors are at the forefront of managing low back pain in the community, however there is a need to strengthen musculoskeletal education in medical training programmes. The results from this research suggest educational interventions on back pain do not need to be extensive in order to have favourable outcomes on medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards back pain. The translational effects of these changes into clinical practice are not known.

1 Introduction

Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disease burden in Australasia [1] in terms of both disability adjusted life year and years lived with disability. The condition is the leading chronic disease forcing older Australians to retire early from the workforce. It is commonly managed by general practitioners – being the 7th most common reason for a general practitioner (GP) visit in Australia [2, 3].

Several studies highlight a discord between guideline-endorsed recommendations for back pain management and actual practice among Australian physicians, including those with a special interest in LBP [4, 5, 6]. Reports from overseas suggest that inadequate training during medical school on how to examine, diagnose, and manage musculoskeletal conditions [7] could be an important attributing factor. A 2010 Australian study exploring back pain management among primary care physicians showed evidence practice gaps for key aspects of care including referral for imaging, provision of advice and analgesic medicines [3]. A more recent study found that many GPs skip key parts of the clinical assessment e.g. there was 22% compliance with performing a neurological examination, 21% compliance in screening for infection and only 12% compliance in screening for cauda equina syndrome [8].

One explanation for these findings is that there is a gap in back pain education in entry level medical training in Australia. To date, there has been no exploration of medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP or the effectiveness of back pain education in this group. Given the time constraints and demands of medical programmes, there is a need to consider methods of education that would be both time-efficient and effective in relaying evidence-based messages regarding back pain management to medical students. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate first year medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP before and after a brief 15-min educational video presentation on LBP. Prior to the intervention, the students had not received any formal LBP education through the programme.

2 Ethical approval

Ethics approval for this project was obtained from Western Sydney University Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) Approval No. H9989.

3 Materials and methods

Intervention

We used Camtasia™ to create a 15-min video covering key aspects of back pain education including: prevalence and economic burden of the disease, triage and evidence-based pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of LBP, signs/symptoms of red flags associated with acute onset LBP. The video was administered to medical students during a statistics workshop in July 2015.

Instrument

Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs were measured using the 25-item.

‘Modified’ Back Beliefs Questionnaire’ (MBBQ), developed with items taken from two previously tested and reliable back beliefs questionnaires [4, 9]. The MBBQ was administered to a group of first year medical students before and after watching the video on back pain. The first 14 items were taken from the validated 14-item “Back Beliefs Questionnaire” whilst items 15–25 were sourced from the 11-item “Buchbinder scale” [4, 9] (Table 1). The wording of the final two items from the Buchbinder scale (items 24 and 25 of the MBBQ) was changed from ‘doctors’ to ‘doctors and pharmacists’. Furthermore, the subject of item 6 of the Buchbinder scale (item 20 of the MBBQ) was changed from first person ‘I’ to ‘doctor’ to make it clear that the item referred to medical referral for imaging. Participants indicated their agreement with each statement on a 5-point Likert scale of ‘Strongly Disagree’ (1) to ‘Strongly Agree’ (5) before and immediately after the video. The MBBQ took the medical students approximately 5-min to complete.

Table 1

Modified back beliefs questionnaire.

Survey item Correct response
(1) There is no real treatment for back trouble Disagree
(2) Back trouble will eventually stop you from working Disagree
(3) Back trouble means periods of pain forthe rest of one’s life Disagree
(4) Doctors cannot do anything for back trouble Disagree
(5) A bad back should be exercised Agree
(6) Back trouble makes everything in life worse Disagree
(7) Surgery is the most effective way to treat back trouble Disagree
(8) Back trouble may mean you end up in a wheelchair Disagree
(9) Alternative treatments are the answer to back trouble Disagree
(10) Back trouble means long periods of time off work Disagree
(11) Medication is the only way to relieve back trouble Disagree
(12) Once you have had back trouble there is always a weakness Disagree
(13) Back trouble MUST be rested Disagree
(14) Later in life back trouble gets progressively worse Disagree
(15) Patients with acute LBP should be recommended complete bed rest until the pain goes away Disagree
(16) Patients should not return to work until they are almost pain free Disagree
(17) X rays of the lumbar spine are useful in the work up of patients with acute LBP Disagree
(18) Encouragement of physical activity is important in the recovery of LBP Agree
(19) Interventions by doctors and other health care providers have very little positive impact on the natural history of acute LBP Disagree
(20) Doctors are likely to order x rays for LBP because patients often expect them to do so Disagree
(21) There is nothing physically wrong with many patients with chronic back pain Agree
(22) Well motivated patients are unlikely to have long term problems with LBP Agree
(23) I have no difficulty in assessing the motivation of people with LBP Agree
(24) Practice guidelines are useful to help doctors and pharmacists in the management of medical conditions Agree
(25) Doctors and pharmacists would find practice guidelines helpful in the management of LBP Agree
  1. Based on current evidence-based management guidelines. Responses on Likert scale of 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: neither disagree or agree;4: agree; 5: strongly agree. Items 1–14 taken from Symonds et al. (1996); items 15–25 taken from Buchbinder et al. (2009).

    Note: Disagreement: disagree/strongly disagree; agreement: agree/strongly agree. Bold items: 9-inevitabililty items: disagreement correct response.

We calculated the inevitability score (sum of the 9-inevitability items: 1, 2, 3, 6, 8,10,12,13,14 taken from the original BBQ; scale range 9–45) as this score has been previously used to measure the effect of an educational intervention on LBP knowledge, attitudes and beliefs [10, 11]. This analysis also allows a comparison to previous interventions which assessed doctors’ and pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP using the same outcome measure (total mean inevitability score) [4, 12]. An analysis of a composite score (range –50 to +50) (sum of transformed mean score [SD] for all 25-items) is also presented. With this method, responses on the Likert scale were transformed to a score ranging from –2 to +2 for each item, where for agreement items, 2 points were allocated for ‘strongly agree’, 1 point for ‘agree’, 0 for ‘neither disagree or agree’, -1 for ‘disagree’ and -2 for ‘strongly disagree’, whereas for disagreement items 2 points were allocated for ‘strongly disagree’, 1 point for ‘agree’, 0 for ‘neither disagree or agree’, -1 for ‘agree’ and –2 for ‘strongly agree’. Here a higher composite score (range –50 to 50) was indicative of more positive responses.

The inevitability items are knowledge-based items encompassing issues around physical activity, bed rest, return to work and recovery within the context of acute LBP. Disagreement with these items is considered the correct response based on recommendations in the LBP literature [13, 14]. Given the direction of the Likert scale used in this study, a lower inevitability score was considered more favourable. A mean change in inevitability score of 3 units was considered to be a meaningful effect, in line with previous LBP intervention studies investigating changes to these same items [11].

Demographic data including age and gender were collected from medical students.

Data analysis

Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS®) version 22. After testing for normality, a non-parametric Wilcoxon Sign Ranks test was used to compare pre- and post- inevitability scores. A Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine differences in responses based on gender. Additionally we tallied the percentage of favourable responses to each questionnaire item before and after the video.

4 Results

A total of 93 medical students completed this study (response rate 97%). The mean age of participants was 20.2 years SD (3.6) and 43% of the cohort were male (n = 43). The distributions of age and gender in this group are broadly representative of medical students in NSW (mean age 24 years, 48.5% male) [15].

5 Key findings

Following the 15–min video on LBP management there was a favourable change in medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP so that it more closely aligned with evidence-based guidelines. This was demonstrated by the significant shift towards correct responses on the post- workshop inevitability score compared with the pre-workshop inevitability score; mean [SD] 20.8 [4.9] and 26.9 [4.2] respectively (lower scores more favourable); mean difference (MD) 6.1, p < 0.001.There was also a marked improvement in post intervention composite score compared with pre-intervention composite score (20.2 [9.2] vs 5.8 [6.9] respectively; (higher composite score favourable) – see Table 2).

Table 2

Number (percentage) of correct responses pre- and post- educational intervention (n = 93).

Item Pre Post
(1) There is no real treatment for back trouble 61 (65.6) 74 (82.6)
(2) Back trouble will eventually stop you from working 35 (37.7) 58 (62.4)
(3) Back trouble means periods of pain for the rest of one’s life 40 (43.0) 64 (68.8)
(4) Doctors cannot do anything for back trouble 85 (91.4) 83 (89.2)
(5) A bad back should be exercised 37 (39.8) 61 (65.6)
(6) Back trouble makes everything in life worse 34 (36.5) 46 (49.5)
(7) Surgery is the most effective way to treat back trouble 60 (64.5) 88 (94.7)
(8) Back trouble may mean you end up in a wheelchair 27 (29.1) 53 (57.0)
(9) Alternative treatments are the answer to back trouble 37 (39.8) 44 (47.3)
(10) Back trouble means long periods of time off work 38 (40.9) 68 (73.1)
(11) Medication is the only way to relieve back trouble 76 (81.1) 82 (88.2)
(12) Once you have had back trouble there is always a weakness 25 (26.9) 66 (71.0)
(13) Back trouble MUST be rested 41 (44.1) 75 (91.4)
(14) Later in life back trouble gets progressively worse 11 (11.9) 31 (33.3)
(15) Patients with acute LBP should be recommended complete bed rest until the pain goes away 52 (55.9) 89 (95.7)
(16) Patients should not return to work until they are almost pain free 37 (39.8) 77 (82.8)
(17) X rays of the lumbar spine are useful in the work up of patients with acute LBP 44 (47.3) 74 (76.6)
(18) Encouragement of physical activity is important in the recovery of LBP 49 (52.7) 79 (85.0)
(19) Interventions by doctors and other health care providers have very little positive impact on the natural history of acute LBP 66 (71.0) 67 (72.1)
(20) Doctors are likely to order x rays for LBP because patients often expect them to do so 30 (32.3) 36 (38.7)
(21) There is nothing physically wrong with many patients with chronic back pain 9 (9.7) 22 (23.6)
(22) Well motivated patients are unlikely to have long term problems with LBP 16 (17.3) 45 (48.4)
(23) I have no difficulty in assessing the motivation of people with LBP 11 (11.8) 21 (22.6)
(24) Practice guidelines are useful to help doctors and pharmacists in the management of medical conditions 77 (82.8) 83 (89.2)
(25) Doctors and pharmacists would find practice guidelines helpful in the management of LBP 81 (87.1) 79 (85.0)
Inevitability score mean (SD) (lower score favourable) 26.9 (4.2) 20.8 (4.9)
Composite score mean (SD) (higher score favourable) 5.8 (6.9) 20.2 (9.2)
  1. Inevitability score (IS): sum of mean (SD) for the 9-inevitability items. Lower inevitability score favourable.

    Composite score (CS): sum of transformed mean (SD) for items 1–25. Higher composite score favourable.

Compared with pre-intervention responses, by the end of the intervention there was a large and significant increase in the number of medical students responding correctly to items regarding return to work ‘2. Back trouble will eventually stop you from working’ (35% vs 58%), and the need to exercise the back ‘5. A bad back should be exercised’ (37% vs 61%), ‘18. Encouragement of physical activity is important in the recovery of LBP’ (49% vs 79%). The most notable changes centred around the need for imaging ‘17. X-rays of the lumbar spine are useful in the workup of patients with acute LBP’ (44% vs 74%), recovery ‘12. Once you have had back trouble there is always a weakness’ (25% vs 66%) and the need for bed rest in acute LBP ‘13. Back trouble must be rested’ (41% vs 75%). There was minimal change to attitudes regarding chronicity of LBP ‘14. Later in life back trouble gets progressively worse’ (11% vs 33%). The two items on the value of practice guidelines were answered similarly pre and post the video with most students endorsing their value (see Table 2). There was no significant effect of gender on questionnaire responses (p >0.05).

6 Discussion

This study has shown that medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP improved following a 15–min educational video on the evidence-based management of LBP so that it more closely aligned with messages in LBP guidelines. Importantly following the video presentation the students were much less likely to endorse common misconceptions regarding the need for bed rest and imaging in acute non-specific LBP.

The intervention was relatively short (lasting approximately 15–min), and the findings would suggest that LBP educational interventions do not need to be extensive in order to be effective. A previous study targeting practising pharmacists employed an intervention which lasted 2-hours and yielded results similar to those observed here [12].

Following the video intervention less students held incorrect beliefs regarding bed rest and the need for imaging in acute LBP among medical students. The knowledge that imaging and bed rest can delay recovery in non-specific back pain [16, 17] may serve to inform their clinical decision making once they become practising clinicians. The impact of practitioner beliefs on treatment choices for their patients is well documented in the LBP literature [18, 19], therefore education and training designed to challenge existing beliefs and behaviours may serve to improve back pain care and alleviate the economic burden of this common condition.

A limitation of this study was that it was conducted at only one undergraduate medical school in Australia, therefore the findings may not be representative. The extent to which this favourable shift in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards LBP will be retained is also unknown. It is likely this information will need to be revisited, particularly in the latter years of the programme as the students prepare for entry into the workforce. Another limitation is the use of a pre post design which does not provide as robust evidence as a randomised controlled trial. It would also be interesting to replicate this study with practising GPs to see if the 15–min video has the same influence as we saw in this study of medical students.

7 Conclusion

Following a brief educational intervention medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain improved so that they more closely aligned with guideline endorsed recommendations.

Highlights

  • Medical doctors are at the forefront of managing low back pain.

  • There is a need to strengthen musculoskeletal education in medical training programmes.

  • A brief back pain intervention improved medical students’ attitudes and beliefs towards back pain.

  • Following the intervention beliefs regarding bed rest and the need for imaging in acute LBP improved.


School of Medicine, Building 30 Goldsmith Avenue, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia.

  1. Conflict of interest: CGM has been an investigator on 2 trials evaluating medicines for back pain that received industry co-funding.

  2. Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

[1] Kassebaum NJ, Arora M, Barber RM, Bhutta ZA, Brown J. Carter A and the GBD 2015 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2015;388:1603–58.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Britt H, Miller GC. General practice activity in Australia 2007–2008. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008. General Practice Series No. 22, Catalog No. GEP 22.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Williams CM, Maher CG, Hancock MJ, McAuley JH, McLachlan AJ, Britt H, Fahridin S, Harrison C, Latimer J. Low back pain and best practice care: a survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med 2010;170:271–7.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Buchbinder R, Staples M, Jolley D. Doctors with a special interest in back pain have poorer knowledge about how to treat back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:1218–26, discussion 27.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Jackson JL, Browning R. Impact of national low back pain guidelines on clinical practice. South Med J 2005;98:139–43.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Somerville S, Hay E, Lewis M, Barber J, van der Windt D, Hill J, Sowden G. Content and outcome of usual primary care for back pain: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 2008;58:790–7, i–vi.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Monrad SU, Zeller JL, Craig CL, DiPonio LA. Musculoskeletal education in US medical schools: lessons from the past and suggestions for the future. Curr Rev Musculosk Med 2011;4:91–8.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ramanathan SA, Hibbert PD, Maher CG, Day RO, Hindmarsh DM, Hooper TD, Hannaford NA, Runciman WB. Care track: towards appropriate care for low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Symonds TL, Burton AK, Tillotson KM, Main CJ. Do attitudes and beliefs influence work loss due to low back trouble? Occup Med (Oxford, England) 1996;46:25–32.Search in Google Scholar

[10] George SZ, Teyhen DS, Wu SS, Wright AC, Dugan JL, Yang G, Robinson ME, Childs JD. Psychosocial education improves low back pain beliefs: results from a cluster randomized clinical trial (NCT00373009) in a primary prevention setting. Eur Spine J 2009;18:1050–8.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gross D, Russell A, Ferrari R, Crites Battie M, Schopflocher D, Hu R, Waddell G, Buchbinder R. The Alberta Back Pain Initiative Study: evaluation of a population-based social marketing intervention study for the prevention of disability associated with low back pain; 2016. Final report. Available at: http://www.worksafesask.com/alberta-back-pain-study [accessed November 5].Search in Google Scholar

[12] Abdel Shaheed C, Maher CG, Mak W, Williams KA, McLachlan AJ. The effects of educational interventions on pharmacists’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain. Int J Clin Pharm 2015;37:616–25.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Australian Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Guidelines Group. Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain – a guide for clinicians. Bowen Heads, Qld: Australian Academic Press; 2004.Search in Google Scholar

[14] van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT. Hutchinson A and the COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J 2006;15(Suppl. 2):S169–91.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Australian Deans Workforce Data; 2015. Available at http://www.medicaldeans.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Workforce-Data-Report-2015.pdf [accessed 20.11.16].Search in Google Scholar

[16] Chou R, Fu R, Carrino JA, Deyo RA. Imaging strategies for low-back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England) 2009;373:463–72.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Dahm KT, Brurberg KG, Jamtvedt G, Hagen KB. Advice to rest in bed versus advice to stay active for acute low-back pain and sciatica. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:Cd007612.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Coudeyre E, Rannou F, Tubach F, Baron G, Coriat F, Brin S, Revel M, Poiraudeau S. General practitioners’ fear-avoidance beliefs influence their management of patients with low back pain. Pain 2006;124:330–7.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Linton SJ, Vlaeyen J, Ostelo R. The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant? J Occup Rehabil 2002;12:223–32.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-02-16
Revised: 2017-03-30
Accepted: 2017-04-01
Published Online: 2017-07-01
Published in Print: 2017-07-01

© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  2. Editorial comment
  3. Glucocorticoids – Efficient analgesics against postherpetic neuralgia?
  4. Original experimental
  5. Effect of intrathecal glucocorticoids on the central glucocorticoid receptor in a rat nerve ligation model
  6. Editorial comment
  7. Important new insight in pain and pain treatment induced changes in functional connectivity between the Pain Matrix and the Salience, Central Executive, and Sensorimotor networks
  8. Original experimental
  9. Salience, central executive, and sensorimotor network functional connectivity alterations in failed back surgery syndrome
  10. Editorial comment
  11. Education and support strategies improve assessment and management of pain by nurses
  12. Clinical pain research
  13. Using education and support strategies to improve the way nurses assess regular and transient pain – A quality improvement study of three hospitals
  14. Editorial comment
  15. The interference of pain with task performance: Increasing ecological validity in research
  16. Original experimental
  17. The disruptive effects of pain on multitasking in a virtual errands task
  18. Editorial comment
  19. Analyzing transition from acute back pain to chronic pain with linear mixed models reveals a continuous chronification of acute back pain
  20. Observational study
  21. From acute to chronic back pain: Using linear mixed models to explore changes in pain intensity, disability, and depression
  22. Editorial comment
  23. NSAIDs relieve osteoarthritis (OA) pain, but cardiovascular safety in question even for diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, and celecoxib: what are the alternatives?
  24. Clinical pain research
  25. Efficacy and safety of diclofenac in osteoarthritis: Results of a network meta-analysis of unpublished legacy studies
  26. Editorial comment
  27. Editorial comment on Nina Kreddig’s and Monika Hasenbring’s study on pain anxiety and fear of (re) injury in patients with chronic back pain: Sex as a moderator
  28. Clinical pain research
  29. Pain anxiety and fear of (re) injury in patients with chronic back pain: Sex as a moderator
  30. Editorial comment
  31. Intraoral QST – Mission impossible or not?
  32. Clinical pain research
  33. Multifactorial assessment of measurement errors affecting intraoral quantitative sensory testing reliability
  34. Editorial comment
  35. Objective measurement of subjective pain-experience: Real nociceptive stimuli versus pain expectation
  36. Clinical pain research
  37. Cerebral oxygenation for pain monitoring in adults is ineffective: A sequence-randomized, sham controlled study in volunteers
  38. Editorial comment
  39. Association between adolescent and parental use of analgesics
  40. Observational study
  41. The association between adolescent and parental use of non-prescription analgesics for headache and other somatic pain – A cross-sectional study
  42. Editorial comment
  43. Cancer-pain intractable to high-doses systemic opioids can be relieved by intraspinal local anaesthetic plus an opioid and an alfa2-adrenoceptor agonist
  44. Clinical pain research
  45. Spinal analgesia for severe cancer pain: A retrospective analysis of 60 patients
  46. Editorial comment
  47. Specific symptoms and signs of unstable back segments and curative surgery?
  48. Clinical pain research
  49. Symptoms and signs possibly indicating segmental, discogenic pain. A fusion study with 18 years of follow-up
  50. Editorial comment
  51. Local anaesthesia methods for analgesia after total hip replacement: Problems of anatomy, methodology and interpretation?
  52. Clinical pain research
  53. Local infiltration analgesia or femoral nerve block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind study
  54. Editorial
  55. Scientific presentations at the 2017 annual meeting of the Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain (SASP)
  56. Abstracts
  57. Correlation between quality of pain and depression: A post-operative assessment of pain after caesarian section among women in Ghana
  58. Abstracts
  59. Dynamic and static mechanical pain sensitivity is associated in women with migraine
  60. Abstracts
  61. The number of active trigger points is associated with sensory and emotional aspects of health-related quality of life in tension type headache
  62. Abstracts
  63. Chronic neuropathic pain following oxaliplatin and docetaxel: A 5-year follow-up questionnaire study
  64. Abstracts
  65. Expression of α1 adrenergic receptor subtypes by afferent fibers that innervate rat masseter muscle
  66. Abstracts
  67. Buprenorphine alleviation of pain does not compromise the rat monoarthritic pain model
  68. Abstracts
  69. Association between pain, disability, widespread pressure pain hypersensitivity and trigger points in subjects with neck pain
  70. Abstracts
  71. Association between widespread pressure pain hypersensitivity, health history, and trigger points in subjects with neck pain
  72. Abstracts
  73. Neuromas in patients with peripheral nerve injury and amputation - An ongoing study
  74. Abstracts
  75. The link between chronic musculoskeletal pain and sperm quality in overweight orthopedic patients
  76. Abstracts
  77. Several days of muscle hyperalgesia facilitates cortical somatosensory excitability
  78. Abstracts
  79. Social stress, epigenetic changes and pain
  80. Abstracts
  81. Characterization of released exosomes from satellite glial cells under normal and inflammatory conditions
  82. Abstracts
  83. Cell-based platform for studying trigeminal satellite glial cells under normal and inflammatory conditions
  84. Abstracts
  85. Tramadol in postoperative pain – 1 mg/ml IV gave no pain reduction but more side effects in third molar surgery
  86. Abstracts
  87. Tempo-spatial discrimination to non-noxious stimuli is better than for noxious stimuli
  88. Abstracts
  89. The encoding of the thermal grill illusion in the human spinal cord
  90. Abstracts
  91. Effect of cocoa on endorphin levels and craniofacial muscle sensitivity in healthy individuals
  92. Abstracts
  93. The impact of naloxegol treatment on gastrointestinal transit and colonic volume
  94. Abstracts
  95. Preoperative downregulation of long-noncoding RNA Meg3 in serum of patients with chronic postoperative pain after total knee replacement
  96. Abstracts
  97. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy and quality of life in Danish type 2 diabetic patients
  98. Abstracts
  99. What about me?”: A qualitative explorative study on perspectives of spouses living with complex chronic pain patients
  100. Abstracts
  101. Increased postural stiffness in patients with knee osteoarthritis who are highly sensitized
  102. Abstracts
  103. Efficacy of dry needling on latent myofascial trigger points in male subjects with neck/shoulders musculoskeletal pain. A case series
  104. Abstracts
  105. Identification of pre-operative of risk factors associated with persistent post-operative pain by self-reporting tools in lower limb amputee patients – A feasibility study
  106. Abstracts
  107. Renal function estimations and dose recommendations for Gabapentin, Ibuprofen and Morphine in acute hip fracture patients
  108. Abstracts
  109. Evaluating the ability of non-rectangular electrical pulse forms to preferentially activate nociceptive fibers by comparing perception thresholds
  110. Abstracts
  111. Detection of systemic inflammation in severely impaired chronic pain patients, and effects of a CBT-ACT-based multi-modal pain rehabilitation program
  112. Abstracts
  113. Fixed or adapted conditioning intensity for repeated conditioned pain modulation
  114. Abstracts
  115. Combined treatment (Norspan, Gabapentin and Oxynorm) was found superior in pain management after total knee arthroplasty
  116. Abstracts
  117. Effects of conditioned pain modulation on the withdrawal pattern to nociceptive stimulation in humans – Preliminary results
  118. Abstracts
  119. Application of miR-223 onto the dorsal nerve roots in rats induces hypoexcitability in the pain pathways
  120. Abstracts
  121. Acute muscle pain alters corticomotor output of the affected muscle stronger than a synergistic, ipsilateral muscle
  122. Abstracts
  123. The subjective sensation induced by various thermal pulse stimulation in healthy volunteers
  124. Abstracts
  125. Assessing Offset Analgesia through electrical stimulations in healthy volunteers
  126. Abstracts
  127. Metastatic lung cancer in patient with non-malignant neck pain: A case report
  128. Abstracts
  129. The size of pain referral patterns from a tonic painful mechanical stimulus is increased in women
  130. Abstracts
  131. Oxycodone and macrogol 3350 treatment reduces anal sphincter relaxation compared to combined oxycodone and naloxone tablets
  132. Abstracts
  133. The effect of UVB-induced skin inflammation on histaminergic and non-histaminergic evoked itch and pain
  134. Abstracts
  135. Topical allyl-isothiocyanate (mustard oil) as a TRPA1-dependent human surrogate model of pain, hyperalgesia, and neurogenic inflammation – A dose response study
  136. Abstracts
  137. Dissatisfaction and persistent post-operative pain following total knee replacement – A 5 year follow-up of all patients from a whole region
  138. Abstracts
  139. Paradoxical differences in pain ratings of the same stimulus intensity
  140. Abstracts
  141. Pain assessment and post-operative pain management in orthopedic patients
  142. Abstracts
  143. Combined electric and pressure cuff pain stimuli for assessing conditioning pain modulation (CPM)
  144. Abstracts
  145. The effect of facilitated temporal summation of pain, widespread pressure hyperalgesia and pain intensity in patients with knee osteoarthritis on the responds to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs – A preliminary analysis
  146. Abstracts
  147. How to obtain the biopsychosocial record in multidisciplinary pain clinic? An action research study
  148. Abstracts
  149. Experimental neck muscle pain increase pressure pain threshold over cervical facet joints
  150. Abstracts
  151. Are we using Placebo effects in specialized Palliative Care?
  152. Abstracts
  153. Prevalence and pattern of helmet-induced headache among Danish military personnel
  154. Abstracts
  155. Aquaporin 4 expression on trigeminal satellite glial cells under normal and inflammatory conditions
  156. Abstracts
  157. Preoperative synovitis in knee osteoarthritis is predictive for pain 1 year after total knee arthroplasty
  158. Abstracts
  159. Biomarkers alterations in trapezius muscle after an acute tissue trauma: A human microdialysis study
  160. Abstracts
  161. PainData: A clinical pain registry in Denmark
  162. Abstracts
  163. A novel method for investigating the importance of visual feedback on somatosensation and bodily-self perception
  164. Abstracts
  165. Drugs that can cause respiratory depression with concomitant use of opioids
  166. Abstracts
  167. The potential use of a serious game to help patients learn about post-operative pain management – An evaluation study
  168. Abstracts
  169. Modelling activity-dependent changes of velocity in C-fibers
  170. Abstracts
  171. Choice of rat strain in pre-clinical pain-research – Does it make a difference for translation from animal model to human condition?
  172. Abstracts
  173. Omics as a potential tool to identify biomarkers and to clarify the mechanism of chronic pain development
  174. Abstracts
  175. Evaluation of the benefits from the introduction meeting for patients with chronic non-malignant pain and their relatives in interdisciplinary pain center
  176. Observational study
  177. The changing face of acute pain services
  178. Observational study
  179. Chronic pain in multiple sclerosis: A10-year longitudinal study
  180. Clinical pain research
  181. Functional disability and depression symptoms in a paediatric persistent pain sample
  182. Observational study
  183. Pain provocation following sagittal plane repeated movements in people with chronic low back pain: Associations with pain sensitivity and psychological profiles
  184. Observational study
  185. A longitudinal exploration of pain tolerance and participation in contact sports
  186. Original experimental
  187. Taking a break in response to pain. An experimental investigation of the effects of interruptions by pain on subsequent activity resumption
  188. Clinical pain research
  189. Sex moderates the effects of positive and negative affect on clinical pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis
  190. Original experimental
  191. The effects of a brief educational intervention on medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs towards low back pain
  192. Observational study
  193. The association between pain characteristics, pain catastrophizing and health care use – Baseline results from the SWEPAIN cohort
  194. Topical review
  195. Couples coping with chronic pain: How do intercouple interactions relate to pain coping?
  196. Narrative review
  197. The wit and wisdom of Wilbert (Bill) Fordyce (1923 - 2009)
  198. Letter to the Editor
  199. Unjustified extrapolation
  200. Letter to the Editor
  201. Response to: “Letter to the Editor entitled: Unjustified extrapolation” [by authors: Supp G., Rosedale R., Werneke M.]
Downloaded on 11.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.04.002/html
Scroll to top button