Home Medicine An investigation into enlarging and reducing the size of mirror reflections of the hand on experimentally induced cold-pressor pain in healthy volunteers
Article Publicly Available

An investigation into enlarging and reducing the size of mirror reflections of the hand on experimentally induced cold-pressor pain in healthy volunteers

  • Stephen Butler EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 1, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

In this issue, Johnson and Gohil raise some interesting points in their article on a technique, mirror therapy, which can modify brain function to assist in rehabilitation in a number of diverse clinical situations [1]. Although they did not show any effect in their experimental paradigm, the literature does indicate effects in patients with chronic pain (phantom limb pain, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)) and in healthy volunteers exposed to experimental pain. In the studies in healthy volunteers where the mirror image is changed from normal, the effects are ambiguous, often opposite to the effects seen in patients as the authors point out [1].

1 Mirror therapy has effects on abnormal cortical representation (in fMRI) of a longstanding painful limb

What is most striking in the pain patients is the fMRI evidence that cortical changes induced by the clinical problems can be partially reversed with this therapy [2]. This is a somewhat unique proof of the central mechanisms involved in both the pain and pain reduction, and in the case of CRPS, improved function as well [2]. As the authors correctly state there is a significant difference between the clinical situation and their volunteer subjects [1]. In patients with an absent limb (phantom limb pain) and in the painful limb in CRPS, there is evidence for reorganization of the cortical representation of the absent limb (phantom limb pain) and of the painful limb (in CRPS) [2].

This is obviously not present in normal volunteers and therefore the effects of mirror therapy on pain perception may not involve the same mechanism (s) in healthy volunteers as in various patient groups. This raises the question of the appropriateness of both preclinical and clinical models used in studies of pain.

2 Animal models of pain and human experimental pain differ from the chronic pain experience in patients

There is a marked difference among animal models of pain, human experimental pain models and clinical chronic pain states. We have ample evidence that robust preclinical effects in animal pain models may be difficult to reproduce in patients. Witness the phenomenon of NK-receptor antagonist MK-801 where there was a stark contrast between pre-clinical pain studies exhibiting marked effects in all animal models but minimal effects in clinical trials.

3 The context-sensitive therapeutic effects in clinical care

The present study showing no effect on experimental cold-pain of either enlarging or decreasing the image of the hand in ice slurry is important in that that context is different from the clinical paradigm used to study treatments for chronic pain, in which there often is a positive context effect on patients [3,4]. The authors point out possible problems with their paradigm which is critical. They indicate a possible negative bias also, but we must also consider possible positive bias in the other models with different and positive results [3]; the context sensitive analgesic effect in patients can be significant and long-lasting [4].

4 The Scandinavian Journal of Pain encourages publication of “negative” studies if the methodology is sound [5]

This brings up the importance of reporting negative studies, a point the authors used in justifying their submission of this article [1]. Rowbotham, in an editorial in Pain, makes a case for publishing negative results in clinical trials and examines publication bias effects when only positive studies are published [6]. A balance with both positive and negative trials allows us to analyze the influence of study design, statistics, subject- and patient-selection, and more. This enables us to gain a clearer picture of effects. This is particularly important in the case of medications for pain and other symptoms where there is a strong reporting bias towards positive results, especially in industry sponsored studies. Although, the study of Johnson and Gohil is not industry sponsored and is not related to patient care directly, it is important to highlight that experimental design can be very important with regard to experimental outcome.

5 The therapeutic context of mirror-therapy influences outcome

It appears that mirror therapy cannot be considered out of the context in which it is used i.e. pain patients are very different from healthy volunteers exposed to short-lasting experimental pain with regard to brain function. It is also possible that cold pain and heat pain, which may involve different pain processing mechanisms, are not equally sensitive to mirror therapy and this information may have clinical relevance related to patient selection for treatment with this therapy. The authors comment that they will repeat this study with a refined design [1]. Should the results be similar, then this is an important finding concerning the mechanism (s) of mirror therapy that can influence the selection of clinical phenotypes that might respond better to this treatment [3,7].


DOI of refers to article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.07.003.



Pain Center, Akademiska sjukhuset, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Tel.: +46 18 6112945; fax: +46 18 503539

  1. Conflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

[1] Johnson, MI, Gohil, M. An investigation into enlarging and reducing the size of mirror reflections of the hand on experimentally-induced cold-pressor pain in healthy human participants. Scand J Pain 2016;10:19–25.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Foell J, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Diers M, Flor M. Mirror therapy for phantom limb pain: brain changes and the role of body representation. Eur J Pain 2014;18:729–39.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Al Sayegh SA, Filén T, Johansson M, Sandström S, Stiewe G, Butler S. Topical review: mirror therapy for complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) - a literature review and an illustrative case report. Scand J Pain 2013;4:200–7.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Finniss DG, Kaptchuk TJ, Miller F, Benedetti F. Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. Lancet 2010;375:686–95.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Kontinen V, Kalso E. Why we are proud to publish well-performed negative clinical studies? Scand J Pain 2013;4:15–6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjpain.2012.11.008.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Rowbotham MC. The case for publishing “negative” clinical trials. Pain 2009;146:225–6.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Breivik H, Allen SM, Stubhaug A. Mirror-therapy: an important tool in the management of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Scand J Pain 2013;4:198–9.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2016-01-01
Published in Print: 2016-01-01

© 2015 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial comment
  2. Plasma pro-inflammatory markers in chronic neuropathic pain: Why elevated levels may be relevant for diagnosis and treatment of patients suffering chronic pain
  3. Original experimental
  4. Plasma pro-inflammatory markers in chronic neuropathic pain: A multivariate, comparative, cross-sectional pilot study
  5. Editorial comment
  6. Genetic variability of pain – A patient focused end-point
  7. Observational study
  8. COMT and OPRM1 genotype associations with daily knee pain variability and activity induced pain
  9. Editorial comment
  10. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) after viper-bite in a pregnant young woman: Pathophysiology and treatment options
  11. Clinical pain research
  12. Complex regional pain syndrome following viper-bite
  13. Editorial comment
  14. An investigation into enlarging and reducing the size of mirror reflections of the hand on experimentally induced cold-pressor pain in healthy volunteers
  15. Original experimental
  16. An investigation into enlarging and reducing the size of mirror reflections of the hand on experimentally-induced cold-pressor pain in healthy human participants
  17. Editorial comment
  18. Multimodal Rehabilitation Programs (MMRP) for patients with longstanding complex pain conditions – The need for quality control with follow-up studies of patient outcomes
  19. Observational study
  20. Patients with chronic pain: One-year follow-up of a multimodal rehabilitation programme at a pain clinic
  21. Editorial comment
  22. Advancing methods for characterizing structure and functions of small nerve fibres in neuropathic conditions
  23. Clinical pain research
  24. Structural and functional characterization of nerve fibres in polyneuropathy and healthy subjects
  25. Editorial comment
  26. Stimulation-induced expression of immediate early gene proteins in the dorsal horn is increased in neuropathy
  27. Original experimental
  28. Stimulation-induced expression of immediate early gene proteins in the dorsal horn is increased in neuropathy
  29. Editorial comment
  30. Targeting glial dysfunction to treat post-surgical neuropathic pain
  31. Topical review
  32. Glial dysfunction and persistent neuropathic postsurgical pain
  33. Editorial comment
  34. Mechanisms of cognitive impairment in chronic pain patients can now be studied preclinically by inducing cognitive deficits with an experimental animal model of chronic neuropathic pain
  35. Original experimental
  36. Impaired recognition memory and cognitive flexibility in the ratL5–L6 spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain
  37. Editorial comment
  38. Pain treatment with intrathecal corticosteroids: Much ado about nothing? But epidural corticosteroids for radicular pain is still an option
  39. Original experimental
  40. Analgesic properties of intrathecal glucocorticoids in three well established preclinical pain models
  41. Editorial comment
  42. The obesity epidemic makes life difficult for patients with herniated lumbar discs – and for back-surgeons: Increased risk of complications
  43. Observational study
  44. Obesity has an impact on outcome in lumbar disc surgery
  45. Editorial comment
  46. Finnish version of the fear-avoidance-beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) and the importance of validated questionnaires on FAB in clinical praxis and in research on low-back pain
  47. Clinical pain research
  48. Translation and validation of the Finnish version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
  49. Editorial comment
  50. Pain, sleep and catastrophizing: The conceptualization matters Comment on Wilt JA et al. “A multilevel path model analysis of the relations between sleep, pain, and pain catastrophizing in chronic pain rehabilitation patients”
  51. Clinical pain research
  52. A multilevel path model analysis of the relations between sleep, pain, and pain catastrophizing in chronic pain rehabilitation patients
Downloaded on 5.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.08.002/html
Scroll to top button