Zum Hauptinhalt springen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Chemical substitution in processes for inherently safer design: pros and cons

  • und EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 25. April 2022

Abstract

The aim of chemical substitution is to replace hazardous chemicals with a less hazardous alternative in a certain product or process to make it safer for human health and the environment. While a lot has been done by researchers, industries and regulatory bodies on chemical substitution for safer products, very little has been reported in the field of safer processes. On the other hand, chemical substitution is one of the core principles of inherently safer design, a concept frequently used in the chemical industry for the prevention of major accidents. This work presents an analysis of implementing chemical substitution methodology for safer processes through inherently safer design. Chemical industries, nowadays, are frequently asked to phase out hazardous chemicals from their processes. This paper provides an insight into the issues and practicability of chemical substitution in processes with the help of case studies and a review of the existing frameworks of inherently safer design.


Corresponding author: Sultana R. Syeda, Department of Chemical Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, e-mail:
Article note: A collection of invited papers based on presentations at the Virtual Conference on Chemistry and its Applications (VCCA-2021) held on-line, 9–13 August 2021.

References

[1] UNITAR and the Sustainable Development Goals, SDGS & CHEMICALS AND WASTE, https://unitar.org/sustainable-development-goals/planet/our-portfolio/sdgs-chemicals-and-waste (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[2] OECD Series on Risk Management, No. 26, Environment, Health and Safety, Environment Directorate, OECD ENV/JM/MONO(2013)24.Suche in Google Scholar

[3] S. R. Syeda, E. A. Khan, O. Padungwatanaroj, N. Kuprasertwong, A. K. Tula. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 36, 100748 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2021.100748.Suche in Google Scholar

[4] 12 Principles of Green Chemistry, https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/greenchemistry/principles/12-principles-of-green-chemistry.html (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[5] T. A. Kletz. Process Saf. Prog. 15, 5 (1996), https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.680150105.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] K. Kidam, H. A. Sahak, M. H. Hassim, S. S. Shahlan, M. Hurme. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 42, 47 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.09.016.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] European Chemicals Agency, European Commission, https://echa.europa.eu/ (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[8] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), http://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/program-assisting-replacementindustrial-solvents-paris-iii (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[9] Occupational Safety and Health Administration, http://www.osha.gov/dsg/safer_chemicals/why_transition.html (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[10] HSE: Control of Major Accident Hazards Regulations. (2015), https://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/background/comah15.htm (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[11] OSHA, Process safety management of highly hazardous chemicals, https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.119 (accessed May 29, 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

[12] X. Gao, A. Raman, H. Hizaddin, M. Bello. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 65, 104092 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104092.Suche in Google Scholar

[13] M. J. Jafari, H. Mohammadi, G. Reniers, M. Pouyakian, F. Nourai, S. A. Torabi, M. R. Miandashti. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 52, 66 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.01.013.Suche in Google Scholar

[14] Occupational Safety and Health Administration. List of Highly Hazardous Chemicals, Toxics and Reactives (Mandatory), https://www.osha.gov/lawsregs/regulations/standardnumber/1910/1910.119AppA.Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs) Guide, https://www.osha.gov/emergency-preparedness/guides/toxic-industrial-chemicals.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] T. Welton. Proc. R. Soc. A: Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 471, 20150502 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0502.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] S. Fukuoka, M. Kawamura, K. Komiya, M. Tojo, H. Hachiya, K. Hasegawa, M. Aminaka, H. Okamoto, I. Fukawa, S. Konno. Green Chem. 5, 497 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1039/b304963a.Suche in Google Scholar

[18] S. J. Patel, D. Ng, M. S. Mannan. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 23, 483 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.03.002.Suche in Google Scholar

[19] A. M. Shariff, D. Zaini. J. Hazard. Mater. 182, 394 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.046.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] P. Gangadharan, R. Singh, F. Cheng, H. H. Lou. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 5921 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1021/ie303163y.Suche in Google Scholar

[21] S. Rathnayaka, F. Khan, P. Amyotte. Saf. Sci. 70, 438 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.06.004.Suche in Google Scholar

[22] S. I. Ahmad, H. Hashim, M. H. Hassim. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 92, 379 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.03.009.Suche in Google Scholar

[23] S. I. A. hmad, H. Hashim, M. H. Hassim. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 42, 59 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.09.018.Suche in Google Scholar

[24] M. Athar, A. M. Shariff, A. Buang, S. Nazir, H. Hermansyah, T. L. See. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 128, 14 (2019b), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.033.Suche in Google Scholar

[25] F. Eljack, M.-K. Kazi, V. Kazantzi. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 57, 280 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.12.004.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] A. Crivellari, S. Bonvicini, A. Tugnoli, V. Cozzani. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 148, 256 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.010.Suche in Google Scholar

[27] R. Rusli, A. M. Shariff. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 23, 157 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.005.Suche in Google Scholar

[28] R. Rusli, A. M. Shariff, F. I. Khan. Saf. Sci. 53, 61 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.002.Suche in Google Scholar

[29] D. Song, E. S. Yoon, N. Jang. J. Loss Prev. Process. Ind. 54, 10 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.02.006.Suche in Google Scholar

[30] S. Sultana, S. Haugen. J. Hazard. Mater. 421, 126590 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126590.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] G. Koller, U. Fischer, K. Hungerbühler. Process Saf. Environ. Protect. 79, 157 (2001), https://doi.org/10.1205/09575820150511939.3.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-04-25
Published in Print: 2022-07-26

© 2022 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Heruntergeladen am 4.5.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/pac-2021-1201/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen