Home The Gloss of Injection-Moulded Recovered Polypropylene
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Gloss of Injection-Moulded Recovered Polypropylene

  • F. Pisciotti , A. Boldizar and M. Rigdahl
Published/Copyright: April 30, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In our recent work, it was shown that the rate of filling during injection moulding did not significantly affect the tensile and impact properties of recovered and virgin polypropylene, whereas significant changes in the properties were observed after ageing at 100 °C. The purpose of the present work was to extend the former study to include the effects of processing and ageing on surface-appearance-related properties, in particular the gloss. In-mould rheology and gate-seal analyses were performed in order to select the filling and post-filling processing windows, respectively. The influences of filling rate, holding and cooling times on the gloss measured in the gate area and at the far end of the moulded specimens were evaluated. The mould used had an embossed surface giving test plaques with a matte appearance. The results showed that the gloss varied by about 30 to 40% within the filling window obtained by in-mould rheology. The slight gloss difference between the two PP-grades noted at the lowest injection speed vanished with increasing filling rate. Gloss differences were observed between the gate area and the far end of each processed moulding, again at the lowest injection speed. The materials processed at a high filling rate exhibited a fairly constant gloss as the holding time increased regardless of the position of the analysed region, whereas a more significant decrease was noted in the case of the mouldings processed at the low filling rate. The cooling time had a negligible effect on the gloss in comparison to the effect of filling rate. Ageing at 100 °C for 240 h increased the gloss level, especially at the far end of the moulding, but only for specimens manufactured at the lowest filling rate. Roughness measurements with a profilometer showed that the gloss development during processing and ageing was related to the topographical matching between the developing polymer surface and the mould topography.


Mail address: A. Boldizar, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden E-mail:

References

1 Lacrampe, M. F., Pabiot, J.: J. Injection Molding Technol.4/4, p. 167 (2000).Search in Google Scholar

2 Hunter, R. S., Harold, R. W.: The Measurement of Appearance. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore (1987).Search in Google Scholar

3 Morse, P. M., in: Pigment Handbook Vol. III, Characterisation and Physical Relationships. Patton, T. C. (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore (1973).Search in Google Scholar

4 Withehouse, D. J., Bowen, D. K., Venkatesh, V. C., Lonardo, P., Brown, C. A.: Cirp Annals.43, p. 541 (1994).10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60500-9Search in Google Scholar

5 Donald, B., Mathew, R.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers34, p. 18 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

6 Seferis, J. C., in: Refractive Indices of Polymers, Polymer Handbook. Brandrup, J., Immergut, E. H. (Eds.), Wiley, New York (1989).Search in Google Scholar

7 Wang, L., Huang, T., Kamal, M. R., Rey, A. D., Teh, J.: Polym. Eng. Sci.40/3, p. 747 (2000).10.1002/pen.11204Search in Google Scholar

8 Bennett, J. M., Mattson, L.: Introduction to Surface Roughness and Scattering. Optical Society of America, Washington D.C. (1989).Search in Google Scholar

9 Schauf, D.: Application Technology Information ATI584e: Reproducing Textures from the Cavity Surface to the Surface of the Thermoplastic Moulding, Bayer Plastics Business Group, KU-Marketing, Technische Redaktion, p. 1 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

10 Speight, R. G.: J. Injection Molding Technol.1/1, p. 25 (1997).Search in Google Scholar

11 Dawkins, E., Engelmann, P., Horton, K.: J. Injection Molding Technol.2/1, p. 1 (1998).Search in Google Scholar

12 Koppi, K., Ceraso, J. M., Cleven, J. A., Salamon, B. A.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers 48/I, p. 184 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

13 Edwards, S. A., Choudhury, N. R.: Polym. Eng. Sci.44/1, p. 96 (2004).10.1002/pen.20009Search in Google Scholar

14 Pisciotti, F., Boldizar, A., Rigdahl, M.: Injection Moulding and Mechanical Properties of Recovered Polypropylene, submitted for publication to International Polymer Processing.Search in Google Scholar

15 Malloy, R. A., Chen, S. J., Orroth, S. A.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers33, p. 225 (1987).Search in Google Scholar

16 Chan, W. L., Daver, F., Friedl, C.: Int. Polym. Process.3, p. 304 (2000).10.3139/217.1601Search in Google Scholar

17 Menges, G.: Plastverarbeiter29, p. 369 (1978).Search in Google Scholar

18 Britton, G. A., Deng, Y.-M., Lam, Y. C.: J. Injection Molding Technol.6/4, p. 305 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

19 Stout, K. J.: Development of Methods for the Surface Characterization of Roughness in Three Dimensions. Penton Press, London (2000).Search in Google Scholar

20 González, V. A., Alanís, M., Guerrero, C., Ortiz, U.: J. Polym. Sci.-Physics B42, p. 646 (2003).10.1002/polb.10748Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-6-9
Accepted: 2005-3-29
Published Online: 2013-04-30
Published in Print: 2005-09-01

© 2005, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.1886/html
Scroll to top button