Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Injection Moulding and Mechanical Properties of Recovered Polypropylene

  • , and
Published/Copyright: April 30, 2013
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This work is a part of a study aiming at assessing the processability of recovered polypropylene in relation to the mechanical and aesthetic performance of as-manufactured and heat aged mouldings. The effects of processing and heat ageing on the mechanical properties of injection-moulded recovered polypropylene were studied here. A similar grade of virgin polypropylene was used as a reference. Multipurpose test specimens were manufactured with a two-cavity mould, according to decoupled moulding procedures. The mouldings were aged at 100°C for 170 h and 340 h. The stiffness, the strength, the elongation at break and the Charpy impact resistance of as-moulded and heat-treated materials were investigated. The results show that the recovered polypropylene could be processed as the analogous virgin grade. Insignificant changes in the measured properties due to the different filling conditions were observed for each polypropylene used. The stiffness and strength of the recycled polypropylene was systematically 20% lower than that of the analogous virgin grade, whereas the impact resistance of the recycled grade was on average 40% higher than that for the virgin grade. There was no significant difference in the elongation at break of the two materials. After the short ageing period, an increase in stiffness and strength of the materials was observed, together with a sharp decrease in the elongation at break and a modest increase in the impact resistance. This was related to re-crystallisation. The long ageing period reduced the stiffness and strength of the materials but there was no significant change in the elongation at break or in the impact resistance.


Mail address: A. Boldizar, Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, SE-41296 Göteborg, Sweden E-mail:

References

1 Malloy, R. A.: Plastic Part Design for Injection Molding. Hanser Publishers, Munich, Vienna, New York (1994).Search in Google Scholar

2 Baird, D. G., Collias, D. I.: Polymer Processing Principles and Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore (1985).Search in Google Scholar

3 Kazmer, D., Barkan, P.: Polym. Eng. Sci.37/11, p. 1880 (1997).10.1002/pen.11838Search in Google Scholar

4 Katti, S. S., Schultz, J. M.: Polym. Eng. Sci.22/16, p. 1001 (1982).10.1002/pen.760221602Search in Google Scholar

5 Viana, J. C., Cunha, A. M., Billon, N.: Polymer43, p. 4185 (2002).10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00253-7Search in Google Scholar

6 Cox, H. W., Mentzer, C. G.: Polym. Eng. Sci.26/7, p. 488 (1986).10.1002/pen.760260707Search in Google Scholar

7 Murphy, M. W., Thomas, K., Bevis, M. J.: Plast. Rubber Process. Appl.9, p. 3 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

8 Crawford, R. J., McGonagle, K.: Plast. Rubber Process. Appl.3, p. 43 (1983).Search in Google Scholar

9 Fiebig, J., Gahleitner, M., Paulik, M., Wolfschwenger, J.: Polymer Testing18, p. 257 (1999).10.1016/S0142-9418(98)00023-3Search in Google Scholar

10 Gahleitner, M.: Journal of Macromolecular Science, Part B: Physics41, p. 833 (2002).10.1081/MB-120013068Search in Google Scholar

11 Gugumus, F.: Polymer Degradation and Stability52, p. 145 (1996).10.1016/0141-3910(95)00227-8Search in Google Scholar

12 Ehrig, R. J.: Plastics Recycling. Hanser Publishers, Munich, Vienna, New York (1989).Search in Google Scholar

13 Sloan, J.: Injection Molding Magazine5/10, p. 118 (1997).Search in Google Scholar

14 Sloan, J.: Injection Molding Magazine5/11, p. 106 (1997).Search in Google Scholar

15 Groleau, R. J.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers37, p. 346 (1991).Search in Google Scholar

16 Furches, B. J., Bujanowki, R.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers37, p. 309 (1991).Search in Google Scholar

17 Bozzelli, J. W., CardinalJ.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers 42/I, p. 584 (1996).Search in Google Scholar

18 Mertes, S. M., Carlson, C., Bozzelli, J.Groleau, M. J.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers 47/I, p. 620 (2001).Search in Google Scholar

19 Cheremisinoff, P. N.: Polymer Characterisation Laboratory Techniques and Analysis. Noyes Publications, Westwood, New Jersey (1996).Search in Google Scholar

20 Brandrup, J., Immergut, E. H.: Polymer Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore (1989).Search in Google Scholar

21 Haslam, J., Willis, H. A., Squirrell, D. C. M.: Identification and Analysis of Plastics. London ILIFFE Books, London (1972).Search in Google Scholar

22 Malloy, R. A., ChenS. J., OrrothS. A.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers33, p. 225 (1987).Search in Google Scholar

23 Menges, G.: Plastverarbeiter29, p. 369 (1978).Search in Google Scholar

24 Boldizar, A., KubátJ.: Polym. Eng. Sci.26/12, p. 877 (1986).10.1002/pen.760261207Search in Google Scholar

25 Britton, G. A., Deng, Y.-M., Lam, Y. C.: J. Injection Molding Technol.6/4, p. 305 (2002).Search in Google Scholar

26 Viana, J. C.: Polymer45, p. 993 (2004).10.1016/j.polymer.2003.12.001Search in Google Scholar

27 Kissel, W. J., Han, J. H., Meyer, J. A., in: Handbook of Polypropylene and Polypropylene Composites, Karian, H. G. (Eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, Basel (1999).Search in Google Scholar

28 Rohn, C., Herh, P.: SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers34, p. 1135 (1988).Search in Google Scholar

29 Perkins, W. G.: Polym. Eng. Sci.39/12, p. 2445 (1999).10.1002/pen.11632Search in Google Scholar

30 Gensler, R., Plummer, C. J. G., Kausch, H.-H., Kramer, E., Pauquet, J.-R., Zweifwel, H.: Polymer Degradation and Stability67, p. 195 (2000).10.1016/S0141-3910(99)00113-5Search in Google Scholar

31 Möller, K., Jansson, A., Sjövall, P.: Polymer Degradation and Stability78, p. 385 (2002).10.1016/S0141-3910(02)00192-1Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2004-6-9
Accepted: 2005-3-29
Published Online: 2013-04-30
Published in Print: 2005-09-01

© 2005, Carl Hanser Verlag, Munich

Downloaded on 13.4.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.3139/217.1887/html
Scroll to top button