Home Theatrical fictional worlds, counterfactuals, and scientific thought experiments
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Theatrical fictional worlds, counterfactuals, and scientific thought experiments

  • Irit Degani-Raz
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2005

Abstract

It is commonly accepted that theatrical fictional worlds could serve as a potent tool for increasing man’s understanding of his own world. This research connects insights that have been developed in such diverse areas of thought as semiotics of theater and drama, philosophical logic and ontology, epistemology, and philosophy of science, so as to establish a model that suggests an explication of this epistemic effect and thereby a new observation of the theatrical enterprise. The theory advanced in this study states that fictional worlds are a kind of thought experiment through which spectators’ theories about their own world may be tested, amended or even invented.

:
Published Online: 2005-10-13
Published in Print: 2005-10-18

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Semiotic systems of works of visual art: Signs, connotations, signals
  2. Art — depression — fiction: A variation on René Thom’s three important kinds of human activity
  3. Formes narratives de l’action et dangers de dérives en narratologie
  4. Crossing borders: Towards a cognitive aesthetic approach to Caravaggio and Beckett
  5. Iconicity, Ratosh’s lexical innovations, and beyond
  6. What you should know to survive in knowledge societies: On a semiotic understanding of ‘knowledge’
  7. Vers une théorie générale de la fiction
  8. Back to ‘cinema is filmed theatre’
  9. The dimensionality of notation
  10. Learning by abduction: A geometrical interpretation
  11. Political representation within the libidinal economy of a pictorial space: A political-semiotic reading of three propaganda posters of the Chinese Cultural Revolution
  12. The semiotic stance
  13. A semiotic study on the Transworld Skateboarding magazine
  14. Serial form as entertainment and interpretative framework: Probability and the ‘black box’ of past experience
  15. It took Spinoza and structuralism to teach Deleuze that meaning is not necessarily attributed to the cinematic sign
  16. Making sense of the visual — is Google the seventh language?
  17. Theatrical fictional worlds, counterfactuals, and scientific thought experiments
  18. PTSD: A situated look at the semiotic process and role of individual umwelts in human existence/function
  19. The semiotics of intercultural exchange: Ostensive definition and digital reason
  20. De l’esprit, de la culture, et des signes
  21. Le statut de la pulsion dans la sémiotique narrative morphodynamique
  22. Une typologie des relations
  23. Biology, semiotics, complexity: An experiment in interdisciplinarity
  24. Sign values in processes of distinction: The concept of luxury
  25. Analyse sémiotique de la webpublicite
  26. On signing translation
  27. Giambattista Vico’s open agenda of modernity
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.157.1-4.353/html
Scroll to top button