Home Back to ‘cinema is filmed theatre’
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Back to ‘cinema is filmed theatre’

  • Eli Rozik
Published/Copyright: October 13, 2005

Abstract

Following its invention, cinema was initially conceived and approached as photographed theatre. After a reasonable period of self-establishment, however, it has become commonplace that cinema essentially differs from theatre, and is thus a new and independent dramatic art form. Eventually, while the advent of performance art created the illusion of a basic affinity to theatre, on the grounds of spectators actually experiencing real bodies on a stage, there has been a broadening of the alleged gap between theatre and cinema, in which the spectator’s experience is mediated by images of actors projected on a screen. I reconsider here both the initial and eventual approaches, reflecting my own intuition that, without ignoring fundamental differences, a feature film is a recording of a fictional world formulated in the medium of theatre. It has to be decoded and interpreted, therefore, as a theatrical text, since a recording does not change the nature of the recorded text. Consequently, differences between cinema and theatre are fundamentally the result of technical constraints and advantages. I support these theses by a thorough analysis and critic of Roland Barthes’ seminal article ‘Rhetoric of the image’ on still photography.

:
Published Online: 2005-10-13
Published in Print: 2005-10-18

Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Semiotic systems of works of visual art: Signs, connotations, signals
  2. Art — depression — fiction: A variation on René Thom’s three important kinds of human activity
  3. Formes narratives de l’action et dangers de dérives en narratologie
  4. Crossing borders: Towards a cognitive aesthetic approach to Caravaggio and Beckett
  5. Iconicity, Ratosh’s lexical innovations, and beyond
  6. What you should know to survive in knowledge societies: On a semiotic understanding of ‘knowledge’
  7. Vers une théorie générale de la fiction
  8. Back to ‘cinema is filmed theatre’
  9. The dimensionality of notation
  10. Learning by abduction: A geometrical interpretation
  11. Political representation within the libidinal economy of a pictorial space: A political-semiotic reading of three propaganda posters of the Chinese Cultural Revolution
  12. The semiotic stance
  13. A semiotic study on the Transworld Skateboarding magazine
  14. Serial form as entertainment and interpretative framework: Probability and the ‘black box’ of past experience
  15. It took Spinoza and structuralism to teach Deleuze that meaning is not necessarily attributed to the cinematic sign
  16. Making sense of the visual — is Google the seventh language?
  17. Theatrical fictional worlds, counterfactuals, and scientific thought experiments
  18. PTSD: A situated look at the semiotic process and role of individual umwelts in human existence/function
  19. The semiotics of intercultural exchange: Ostensive definition and digital reason
  20. De l’esprit, de la culture, et des signes
  21. Le statut de la pulsion dans la sémiotique narrative morphodynamique
  22. Une typologie des relations
  23. Biology, semiotics, complexity: An experiment in interdisciplinarity
  24. Sign values in processes of distinction: The concept of luxury
  25. Analyse sémiotique de la webpublicite
  26. On signing translation
  27. Giambattista Vico’s open agenda of modernity
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.157.1-4.169/html
Scroll to top button