What is political semiotics and why does it matter? A reply to Janar Mihkelsaar

References

Bakhtin, Mikhail. 2001. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. M. Holquist (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barthes, Roland. 1980 [1971]. From work to text. In: Image-Music-text. (trans.) S. Heath, 155-164. New York: Hill and Wang.Search in Google Scholar

Bevir, Mark. 2008. Meta-methodology: Clearing the underbrush. In J. Box-Steffensmeier, H. Brady & D. Collier (eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology, 48–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Dépelteau, François (ed.). 2018. The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9Search in Google Scholar

Glynos, Jason & David Howarth. 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203934753Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Peter. 2003. Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In J. Mahoney & Dietrich Rueschemeyer (eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences, 373–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803963.012Search in Google Scholar

Hay, Colin. 2006. Political ontology. In R. Goodin & C. Tilly (eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis, 78–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Jørgensen, Marianne W. & Louise J. Phillips. 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage.10.4135/9781849208871Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, Michael. 2010. The rhetoric of hegemony: Laclau, radical democracy, and the rule of tropes. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43(3). 253–283.10.1353/par.0.0061Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. 1999. The politics of rhetoric. In T. Cohen, J. H. Miller & B. Cohen (eds.), Material events: Paul De Man and the afterlife of theory, 229–253. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Search in Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto. 2007. Discourse. In R. Goodin, P. Pettit & T. Pogge (eds.), A companion to contemporary political philosophy, 541–547. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1111/b.9781405136532.2007.00028.xSearch in Google Scholar

Laclau, Ernesto & Chantal Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards radical democratic politics. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri. 1977 [1971]. The structure of artistic text. (Michigan Slavic contributions 7). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri. 1997. Culture as a subject and an object in itself. Trames 1(51/46). 7–16.10.3176/tr.1997.1.01Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Juri. 2009. Culture and explosion. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218473Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Mihhail. 2000. A few notes on the philosophical background of the Tartu school of semiotics. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 12. 23–46.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, David, Selen A. Ercon & Paul Furlong. 2018. A skin not a sweater: Ontology and epistemology in political science. In Vivien Lowndes, David Marsh & Gerry Stoker (eds.), Theory and methods in political science, 4th edn., 177–198. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-60353-1_11Search in Google Scholar

Marttila, Tomas. 2015. Post-foundational discourse analysis: From political difference to empirical research. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137538406_2Search in Google Scholar

Mihkelsaar, Janar. 2018. Lotman’s semiotic theory of culture or Laclau’s political ontology? Semiotica 224. 135–163.10.1515/sem-2016-0199Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2009. Vaevaline tee pronksmemuaristikast ühiskonnaanalüüsini. Acta Politica Estica 3. 99–13.Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2010. Toward a semiotic model of democracy. Applied Semiotics/Sémiotique appliquée 10(25). 22–54.Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2011. An outline for a theory of political semiotics. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2013. A political-semiotic introduction to the Estonian “bronze-night” discourse. Journal of Language & Politics 12(1). 80–100.10.1075/jlp.12.1.04selSearch in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2016a. Two faces of the ‘relational turn’. PS: Political Science & Politics 49(1). 27–31.10.1017/S1049096515001195Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2016b. ‘The fable of the Bs’: Between substantialism and deep relational thinking about power. Journal of Political Power 9(2). 183–205.10.1080/2158379X.2016.1191163Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter. 2018. Power and relational sociology. In François Dépelteau (ed.), The Palgrave handbook of relational sociology, 539–557. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_27Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter & Rein Ruutsoo. 2014. Teleological historical narrative as a strategy for constructing political antagonism: The example of the narrative of Estonia’s regaining of independence. Semiotica 202. 365−393.10.1515/sem-2014-0063Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel. 2008. Towards a semiotic theory of hegemony: Naming as hegemonic operation in Lotman and Laclau. Sign Systems Studies 36(1). 167–183.10.12697/SSS.2008.36.1.09Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel. 2009. Semiootilise hegemooniateooria suunas: Laclau ja Lotman dialoogis. Acta Semiotica Estica VI. 120–132.Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel. 2010. An outline for a semiotic theory of hegemony. Semiotica 182. 443–474.10.1515/semi.2010.067Search in Google Scholar

Selg, Peeter & Andreas Ventsel. 2012. On semiotic theory of hegemony: Conceptual foundation and a brief sketch for future research. In S. Frank, C. Ruhe & A. Schmitz (eds.), Explosion und Peripherie. Jurij Lotmans Semiotik der kulturellen Dynamik revislted, 41–56. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.10.1515/transcript.9783839417850.41Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2009. Towards semiotic theory of hegemony. Tartu: Tartu University Press.10.1515/semi.2010.067Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2010a. Hegemooniline tähistamisprotsess fotograafias. Kunstiteaduslikke Uurimusi=Studies on Art and Architecture=Studien für Kunstwissenschaft 19. 212−234.Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2010b. The construction of the Stalinist post-war (1944–1953) “Soviet People”: A concept in the political rhetoric of Soviet Estonia. Applied Semiotics/Sémiotique appliquée 10(25). 73−83.Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2010c. Visualization of “people” in Soviet Estonian public photos of Stalinist era. Social Semiotics 20(5). 593−612.10.1080/10350330.2010.513194Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2011a. Hegemonic signification from cultural semiotics point of view. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4). 58–88.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.04Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2011b. On the independence of the humanities: TMS and official soviet politics of science. Review: Max Waldstein, Soviet Empire of Sign. VDM Verlag Dr Müller, 2008. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4). 357–366.10.12697/SSS.2011.39.2-4.15Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2012. Political analysis as auto-communication of culture. Chinese Semiotic Studies 7(1). 260−270.10.1515/css-2012-0019Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas. 2014. Hegemonic signification from perspective of visual rhetoric. Semiotica 199. 175−192.10.1515/sem-2013-0124Search in Google Scholar

Ventsel, Andreas & Taras Boyko. 2018. On the analysis of power and politics from the perspective of Juri Lotman’s semiotics of culture. Sign Systems Studies 46(1). 168−177.10.12697/SSS.2018.46.1.08Search in Google Scholar

Waldstein, Maxim. 2008. Soviet Empire of signs: A history of the Tartu School of Semiotics. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag.Search in Google Scholar