Abstract
Studies on the relationship between brand equity and long-term promotional effectiveness have many issues. Brand equity measures can be classified as either consumer-based (CB) or firm-based (FB) measures. Previous literature has mostly focused on one or the other type of measure, mostly due to computational difficulties or data limitations, making it difficult to determine whether the results can be generalized to all types of measure. In addition, long-term promotional effectiveness remains a debatable issue due to complicated long-term effects. Our study is the first to include both CB and FB brand equity measures in a long-term promotional effectiveness study. Using weekly scanner data in the breakfast category covering a three-year period, we are able to compute a variety of popular operationalizations of brand equity measures by employing the aggregate demand model and capture total long-term effects via the persistence model. Our major finding is that the general consensus that higher brand equity generates higher promotional effectiveness applies only to typical FB measures—not CB measures. Moreover, we show a positive accumulated long-term effectiveness and an absence of permanent effects for all our brands. These results offer new insights into the differentiation of major brand equity measures and long-term promotional effectiveness.
BLP model results for three years.
Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter | Coefficient | Coefficient | Coefficient | |
Constant | −5.666 (1.37)c | −9.539 (1.22)c | −2.738(1.376)a | |
Price | −79.298(32.199)b | −50.469(18.85)c | −46.258(13.859)c | |
Advertising | 0.01(0.00)c | 0.057(0.00)c | 0.086(0.011)c | |
Sugar | 0.718(0.774) | −0.005(0.039) | −0.296(0.342) | |
Fat | −3.36(0.001)c | −4.84(0.723)c | −0.260(1.021) | |
Fiber | −0.544(0.632) | −0.684(0.743) | −1.081(0.579) | |
Calories | 0.82(0.046)c | 0.675(0.096)c | 0.143(0.108) | |
All family | 0.73(0.150)c | 0.923(0.207)c | 0.586(0.192)c | |
Kids | −0.256(0.23) | 0.134(0.099) | 0.173(0.302) | |
Health | 4.87(0.522)c | 2.173(0.228)c | 1.037(0.304)c | |
Standard deviations | Constant | 0.008(0.369) | 0.001(0.594) | 0.01(0.601) |
Price | 0.128(3.257) | 0.036(3.183) | 0.087(3.174) | |
Sugar | 0.099(0.062) | 0.048(0.097) | 0.042(0.095) | |
Fat | 0.032(3.594) | 0.003(3.851) | 0.030(3.794) | |
Fiber | 0.013(4.58) | 0.011(4.491) | 0.112(4.438) | |
Calories | 0.0001(0.066) | 0.005(0.049) | 0.000(0.047) | |
All family | 0.005(2.372) | 0.002(2.051) | 0.223(2.205) | |
Kids | 0.001(1.030) | 0.02(2.078) | 0.020(2.076) | |
Adults | 0.001(5.810) | 0.003(3.961) | 0.101(4.080) | |
Interactions | Price * Child | 0.329(7.132) | 0.115(9.874) | 0.115(10.149) |
Price * Income | 0.230(67.069) | 0.203(6.172) | 0.207 (6.258) |
-
a p < 0.05; b p < 0.01; c p < 0.001. Numbers in the parentheses are standard errors.
Table A-1 presents the estimated model results. The price and advertising variables are the two major variables. As expected, price has a negative impact on individual demand, while advertising has a positive impact on an individual’s demand. The standard deviations of all the estimates are insignificant (as expected), suggesting that the heterogeneity in the coefficients has been mostly explained by the included demographics variables (Nevo 2000).
References
Aaker, D. A. 1991. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar
Aaker, D. A. 1996. “Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets.” California Management Review 38 (3): 102–120.10.2307/41165845Search in Google Scholar
Abraham, M. M., and L. M. Lodish. 1987. “Promoter: An Automated Promotion Evaluation System.” Marketing Science 6 (2): 101–23, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.6.2.101.Search in Google Scholar
Agarwal, M. K., and V. R. Rao. 1996. “An Empirical Comparison of Consumer-Based Measures of Brand Equity.” Marketing Letters 7 (3): 237–47, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00435740.Search in Google Scholar
Ailawadi, K. L., D. R. Lehmann, and S. A. Neslin. 2001. “Market Response to a Major Policy Change in the Marketing Mix: Learning from Procter & Gamble’s Value Pricing Strategy.” Journal of Marketing 65 (1): 44–61, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.1.44.18130.Search in Google Scholar
Ailawadi, K. L., D. R. Lehmann, and S. A. Neslin. 2003. “Revenue Premium as an Outcome Measure of Brand Equity.” Journal of Marketing 67 (4): 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.4.1.18688.Search in Google Scholar
Ailawadi, K. L., J. P. Beauchamp, N. Donthu, D. K. Gauri, and V. Shankar. 2009. “Communication and Promotion Decisions in Retailing: A Review and Directions for Future Research.” Journal of Retailing 85 (1): 42–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.002.Search in Google Scholar
Ailawadi, K. L., K. Gedenk, C. Lutzky, and S. A. Neslin. 2007. “Decomposition of the Sales Impact of Promotion-Induced Stockpiling.” Journal of Marketing Research 44 (3): 450–67, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.450.Search in Google Scholar
Ailawadi, K. L., and S. A. Neslin. 1998. “The Effect of Promotion on Consumption: Buying More and Consuming it Faster.” Journal of Marketing Research 35 (3): 390–8, https://doi.org/10.2307/3152036.Search in Google Scholar
Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58 (2): 277–97, https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968.Search in Google Scholar
Assuncao, J. L., and R. J. Meyer. 1993. “The Rational Effect of Price Promotions on Sales and Consumption.” Management Science 39 (5): 517–35, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.5.517.Search in Google Scholar
Ataman, M. B., H. J. Van Heerde, and C. F. Mela. 2010. “The Long-Term Effect of Marketing Strategy on Brand Sales.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (5): 866–82, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.5.866.Search in Google Scholar
Bayer, E., K. R. Tuli, and B. Skiera. 2017. “Do Disclosures of Customer Metrics Lower Investors’ and Analysts’ Uncertainty But Hurt Firm Performance?” Journal of Marketing Research 54 (2): 239–59, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0028.Search in Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. 1967. “Self-perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive Dissonance Phenomena.” Psychological Review 74 (3): 183, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024835.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, S. T. 1994. “Estimating Discrete-Choice Models of Product Differentiation.” The RAND Journal of Economics 25 (2): 242–62, https://doi.org/10.2307/2555829.Search in Google Scholar
Berry, S. T., L. James, and A. Pakes. 1995. “Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 63 (4): 841–90, https://doi.org/10.2307/2171802.Search in Google Scholar
Blattberg, R. C., B. Do Kim, and A. Neslin Scott. 2008. Database Marketing: Analyzing and Managing Customers. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-72579-6Search in Google Scholar
Blattberg, R. C., R. Briesch, and E. J. Fox. 1995. “How Promotions Work.” Marketing Science 14 (Suppl. 3): G122–32, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.g122.Search in Google Scholar
Blattberg, R. C., and K. J. Wisniewski. 1989. “Price-Induced Patterns of Competition.” Marketing Science 8 (4): 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.8.4.291.Search in Google Scholar
Bronnenberg, B. J., M. W. Kruger, and C. F. Mela. “Database Paper—The IRI Marketing Data Set.” Marketing Science 27 (4): 745–8, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0450.Search in Google Scholar
Chintagunta, P. K. 2002. “Investigating Category Pricing Behavior at a Retail Chain.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (2): 141–54.10.1509/jmkr.39.2.141.19090Search in Google Scholar
Datta, H., K. L. Ailawadi, and H. J. Van Heerde. 2017. “How Well Does Consumer-Based Brand Equity Align with Sales-Based Brand Equity and Marketing-Mix Response?” Journal of Marketing 81 (3): 1–20, https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0340.Search in Google Scholar
Dekimpe, M. G., and D. M. Hanssens. 1999. “Sustained Spending and Persistent Response: A New Look at Long-Term Marketing Profitability.” Journal of Marketing Research 35: 397–412.10.1142/9789813229808_0005Search in Google Scholar
Dekimpe, M. G., D. M. Hanssens, and J. M. Silva-Risso. 1998. “Long-run Effects of Price Promotions in Scanner Markets.” Journal of Econometrics 89 (1–2): 269–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00064-5.Search in Google Scholar
De Vries, L., S. Gensler, and P. S.H. Leeflang. 2017. “Effects of Traditional Advertising and Social Messages on Brand-Building Metrics and Customer Acquisition.” Journal of Marketing 81 (5): 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0178.Search in Google Scholar
Dubin, J. A. 1998. “The Demand for Branded and Unbranded Products—An Econometric Method for Valuing Intangible Assets.” In Chapter 4 in Studies in Consumer Demand—Econometric Methods Applied to Market Data, 77–127. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4615-5665-7_4Search in Google Scholar
Erdem, T. 1996. “A Dynamic Analysis of Market Structure Based on Panel Data.” Marketing science 15 (4): 359–78.10.1287/mksc.15.4.359Search in Google Scholar
Gangwar, M., N. Kumar, and R. C. Rao. 2014. “Consumer Stockpiling and Competitive Promotional Strategies.” Marketing Science 33 (1): 94–113, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0814.Search in Google Scholar
Gijsbrechts, E. 1993. “Prices and Pricing Research in Consumer Marketing: Some Recent Developments.” International journal of research in marketing 10 (2): 115–51.10.1016/0167-8116(93)90001-FSearch in Google Scholar
Goldfarb, A., Q. Lu, and S. Moorthy. 2009. “Measuring Brand Value in an Equilibrium Framework.” Marketing Science 28 (1): 69–86, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0376.Search in Google Scholar
Guyt, J. Y., and E. Gijsbrechts. 2014. “Take Turns or March in Sync? the Impact of the National Brand Promotion Calendar on Manufacturer and Retailer Performance.” Journal of Marketing Research 51 (6): 753–72, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0193.Search in Google Scholar
Hanssens, D. M., K. H. Pauwels, S. Srinivasan, M. Vanhuele, and G. Yildirim. 2014. “Consumer Attitude Metrics for Guiding Marketing Mix Decisions.” Marketing Science 33 (4): 534–50.10.1142/9789813229808_0014Search in Google Scholar
Henderson, T., and N. Arora. 2010. “Promoting Brands Across Categories with a Social Cause: Implementing Effective Embedded Premium Programs.” Journal of Marketing 74 (6): 41–60, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.6.41.Search in Google Scholar
Hjorth-Andersen, C. 1984. “The Concept of Quality and the Efficiency of Markets for Consumer Products.” Journal of Consumer Research 11 (2): 708–18, https://doi.org/10.1086/209007.Search in Google Scholar
Jedidi, K., C. F. Mela, and S. Gupta. 1999. “Managing Advertising and Promotion for Long-Run Profitability.” Marketing Science 18 (1): 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.18.1.1.Search in Google Scholar
Joshi, A., and D. M. Hanssens. 2010. “The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value.” Journal of Marketing 74: 20–33.10.1142/9789813229808_0013Search in Google Scholar
Kalyanaram, G., and R. S. Winer. 1995. “Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research.” Marketing Science 14 (Suppl. 3): G161–9, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.g161.Search in Google Scholar
Kamakura, W. A., and G. J. Russell. 1993. “Measuring Brand Value with Scanner Data.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 10 (1): 9–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(93)90030-3.Search in Google Scholar
Keller, K. L. 1993. “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity.” Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 1–22, https://doi.org/10.2307/1252054.Search in Google Scholar
Keller, K. L. 2003. Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, H., and D. M. Hanssens. 2017. “Advertising and Word-of-Mouth Effects on Pre-launch Consumer Interest and Initial Sales of Experience Products.” Journal of Interactive Marketing 37: 57–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.08.001.Search in Google Scholar
Krishna, A., R. Briesch, D. R. Lehmann, and H. Yuan. 2002. “A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Price Presentation on Perceived Savings.” Journal of Retailing 78 (2): 101–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-4359(02)00072-6.Search in Google Scholar
Lewbel, A. 2012. “Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 30 (1): 67–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2012.643126.Search in Google Scholar
Luo, X. 2009. “Quantifying the Long-Term Impact of Negative Word of Mouth on Cash Flows and Stock Prices.” Marketing Science 28 (1): 148–65, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0389.Search in Google Scholar
McFadden, D., and K. Train. 2000. “Mixed MNL Models for Discrete Response.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 15 (5): 447–70, https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::aid-jae570>3.0.co;2-1.10.1002/1099-1255(200009/10)15:5<447::AID-JAE570>3.0.CO;2-1Search in Google Scholar
Mela, C. F., S. Gupta, and D. R. Lehmann. 1997. “The Long-Term Impact of Promotion and Advertising on Consumer Brand Choice.” Journal of Marketing Research 34 (2): 248–61, https://doi.org/10.2307/3151862.Search in Google Scholar
Mela, C. F., K. Jedidi, and B. Douglas. 1998. “The Long-Term Impact of Promotions on Consumer Stockpiling Behavior.” Journal of Marketing Research 35 (2): 250–62, https://doi.org/10.2307/3151852.Search in Google Scholar
Mizik, N., and R. Jacobson. 2008. “The Financial Value Impact of Perceptual Brand Attributes.” Journal of Marketing Research 45 (1): 15–32, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.1.15.Search in Google Scholar
Nguyen, H. T., and F. Hui. 2021. “Antecedents and Financial Impacts of Building Brand Love.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 38 (3): 572–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.10.001.Search in Google Scholar
Nevo, A. 2000. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Estimation of Random-Coefficients Logit Models of Demand.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 9 (4): 513–48, https://doi.org/10.1162/105864000567954.Search in Google Scholar
Nevo, A. 2001. “Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-Eat Cereal Industry.” Econometrica 69 (2): 307–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00194.Search in Google Scholar
Oh, T. T., K. L. Keller, S. A. Neslin, D. J. Reibstein, and D. R. Lehmann. 2020. “The Past, Present, and Future of Brand Research.” Marketing Letters 31: 151–62, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-020-09524-w.Search in Google Scholar
Osinga, E. C., P. S.H. Leeflang, and J. E. Wieringa. 2010. “Early Marketing Matters: A Time-Varying Parameter Approach to Persistence Modeling.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1): 173–85, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.1.173.Search in Google Scholar
Pauwels, K., D. M. Hanssens, and S. Siddarth. 2002. “The Long-Term Effects of Price Promotions on Category Incidence, Brand Choice, and Purchase Quantity.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (4): 421–39, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.4.421.19114.Search in Google Scholar
Shi, Y. 2018. “Is the Simple Price Premium that Simple?” Review of Marketing Science 16 (1): 25–47, https://doi.org/10.1515/roms-2018-0009.Search in Google Scholar
Slotegraaf, R. J., C. Moorman, and J. Jeffrey Inman. 2003. “The Role of Firm Resources in Returns to Market Deployment.” Journal of Marketing Research 40 (3): 295–309, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.295.19235.Search in Google Scholar
Slotegraaf, R. J., and K. Pauwels. 2008. “The Impact of Brand Equity and Innovation on the Long-Term Effectiveness of Promotions.” Journal of Marketing Research 45 (3): 293–306, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.45.3.293.Search in Google Scholar
Shocker, A. D., and B. Weitz. 1988. A Perspective on Brand Equity Principles and Issues (Report No. 91–124). Cambridge: Marketing Science Institute.Search in Google Scholar
Simon, C. J., and M. W. Sullivan. 1993. “The Measurement and Determinants of Brand Equity: A Financial Approach.” Marketing Science 12 (1): 28–52, https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.1.28.Search in Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S., K. Pauwels, D. M. Hanssens, and M. G. Dekimpe. 2004. “Do Promotions Benefit Manufacturers, Retailers, or Both?” Management Science 50 (5): 617–29, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0225.Search in Google Scholar
Sriram, S., S. Balachander, and M. U. Kalwani. 2007. “Monitoring the Dynamics of Brand Equity Using Store-Level Data.” Journal of Marketing 71 (2): 61–78, https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.2.61.Search in Google Scholar
Stahl, F., M. Heitmann, D. R. Lehmann, and S. A. Neslin. 2012. “The Impact of Brand Equity on Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Profit Margin.” Journal of Marketing 76 (4): 44–63, https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.10.0522.Search in Google Scholar
Sudhir, K. 2001. “Competitive Pricing Behavior in the Auto Market: A Structural Analysis.” Marketing Science 20 (1): 42–60.10.1287/mksc.20.1.42.10196Search in Google Scholar
Vieira, V. A., M. I. S. de Almeida, R. Agnihotri, N. S. De Arruda Corrêa da Silva, and S. Arunachalam. 2019. “In Pursuit of an Effective B2B Digital Marketing Strategy in an Emerging Market.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 47 (6): 1085–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00687-1.Search in Google Scholar
Vilcassim, N. J., and P. K. Chintagunta. 1995. “Investigating Retailer Product Category Pricing from Household Scanner Panel Data.” Journal of Retailing 71 (2): 103–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(95)90003-9.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, J. Z., and C.-W. Chang. 2021. “Consumer Dynamics: Theories, Methods, and Emerging Directions.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 49 (1): 166–96, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00720-8.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, D. J., H. Dai, L. Dong, F. Qi, N. Zhang, X. Liu, Z. Liu, and Y. Jiang. 2020. “The Long-Term and Spillover Effects of Price Promotions on Retailing Platforms: Evidence from a Large Randomized Experiment on Alibaba.” Management Science 66 (6): 2589–609, https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3316.Search in Google Scholar
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- On the Role of Ad Networks: To Endogenize or Not to Endogenize the Number of Bidders in Auctions?
- Profile Photos’ Impact in Online Reviews: The Effect of Cultural Differences
- Attitudes Toward Global and Local Consumer Culture and the Meanings of Brands
- On the Determinants of Online Short Videos’ Effectiveness Relative to Parents’ Attitudes, Behavioural Intentions and Consideration of Alternatives
- Predicting User Response Behaviour towards Social Media Advertising and e-WoM Antecedents
- Revisiting the Recent History of Consumer Behavior in Marketing Journals: A Topic Modeling Perspective
- Service Dominant Logic and Market Orientation: A Case Study of Brazilian Agribusiness Firms
- How Do Different Brand Equity Measures Affect Long-Term Promotional Effectiveness?
- Why Is the Placebo Effect Different in Marketing? A Study on Moderating Persuasion by Authority
- Exploring the Sources of Consumer-Based Brand Equity in the Cryptocurrency Market
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- On the Role of Ad Networks: To Endogenize or Not to Endogenize the Number of Bidders in Auctions?
- Profile Photos’ Impact in Online Reviews: The Effect of Cultural Differences
- Attitudes Toward Global and Local Consumer Culture and the Meanings of Brands
- On the Determinants of Online Short Videos’ Effectiveness Relative to Parents’ Attitudes, Behavioural Intentions and Consideration of Alternatives
- Predicting User Response Behaviour towards Social Media Advertising and e-WoM Antecedents
- Revisiting the Recent History of Consumer Behavior in Marketing Journals: A Topic Modeling Perspective
- Service Dominant Logic and Market Orientation: A Case Study of Brazilian Agribusiness Firms
- How Do Different Brand Equity Measures Affect Long-Term Promotional Effectiveness?
- Why Is the Placebo Effect Different in Marketing? A Study on Moderating Persuasion by Authority
- Exploring the Sources of Consumer-Based Brand Equity in the Cryptocurrency Market