The Ontology and Syntax of Stoic Causes and Effects
-
Jean-Baptiste Gourinat
Abstract
The ontology of Stoic causes and effects was clearly anti-platonic, since the Stoics did not want to admit that any incorporeal entity could have an effect. However, by asserting that any cause was the cause of an incorporeal effect, they returned to Plato’s syntax of causes in the Sophist, whose doctrine of the asymmetry of nouns and verbs identified names with the agents and verbs with the actions. The ontological asymmetry of causes and effects blocked the multiplication of causes by reducing it to an efficient cause. However, while ontology and syntax merged into the doctrine of the effect as an incorporeal predicate, this was further complicated by a relational description of a cause as the effect of a body on a body and by the distinction of causes. Since there are different kinds of causes, not every kind of cause has the same syntactical role in the nexus of causal relations. This refinement of the original syntactical model presumably allowed the Stoics to give a more coherent view of human action than is usually assumed.
Article note: I wish to express my gratitude to Yue Lu and István Bodnár for their help in correcting my English, together with some useful suggestions.
References
Algra, K. (2003): “Stoic theology”. In: Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–178.10.1017/CCOL052177005X.007Search in Google Scholar
Aubry, G. (2008): “Capacité et convenance: la notion d’epitêdeiotês dans la théorie porphyrienne de l’embryon”. In: Brisson, L., Congourdeau, M.-H., and Solère, J.-L. (eds.), L’embryon: formation et animation, Paris, Vrin, pp. 139–155.Search in Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1998): Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199247676.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988): “La théorie stoïcienne du genre suprême et l’ontologie platonicienne”. In: Barnes, J. and M. Mignucci (eds.), Matter and Metaphysics. Naples: Bibliopolis, pp. 19–27; English translation in Brunschwig, J. Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 92–157.Search in Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2003): “Stoic Metaphysics”. In: Inwood, B. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, , pp. 206–232.10.1017/CCOL052177005X.009Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1987): “The original notion of cause”. In: Frede, M., Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 125–150.Search in Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2005): “La théologie stoïcienne”. In: Romeyer Dherbey, G. and J.-B. Gourinat (eds.), Les stoïciens. Paris: Vrin, pp. 213–232.Search in Google Scholar
Geach, P. (1972): “History of the corruptions of logic”. In: Geach, P., Logic Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 44–61.Search in Google Scholar
Goulet, R. (2006): Diogène Laërce, Vies et doctrines des stoïciens, transl. R. Goulet. Paris: Librairie Générale Française.Search in Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. (forthcoming): “Stoic dialectic and its objects”. In: Bénatouïl, Th. and K. Ierodiakonou (eds.), Dialectic in Hellenistic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1017/9781108681810.007Search in Google Scholar
Havrda M. (2016): The So-Called Eighth Stromateus by Clement of Alexandria. Leiden, Brill.10.1163/9789004325289Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2007): Seneca, Selected Philosophical Letters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D.N. (1987): The Hellenistic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2 volumes).10.1017/CBO9781139165907Search in Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, J. (1956): Aristotle’s Syllogistic from the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mikeš, V. (2016): Le paradoxe stoïcien : liberté de l’action déterminée. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar
Salles, R. (2005): The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Aldershot: Ashgate.10.4324/9781315236933Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1977): “Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic Philosophy”, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 203, pp. 74–121.10.1017/S0068673500003941Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. (1999): “Hellenistic physics and metaphysics”. In: Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. & M. Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 355–411.10.1017/CHOL9780521250283.012Search in Google Scholar
Totschnig, W. (2013): “Bodies and their effects: the Stoics on causation and incorporeals”, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95, pp. 119–147.10.1515/agph-2013-0006Search in Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2009): “Sons of the Earth: are the Stoics metaphysical brutes?”, Phronesis 54, pp. 136–154.10.1163/156852809X403630Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
