Home Removal of uranium ions from synthetic wastewater using ZnO/Na-clinoptilolite nanocomposites
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Removal of uranium ions from synthetic wastewater using ZnO/Na-clinoptilolite nanocomposites

  • Azadeh Aghadavoud , Khadijeh Rezaee Ebrahim Saraee EMAIL logo , Hamid Reza Shakur and Rasol Sayyari
Published/Copyright: August 6, 2016

Abstract

Uranium is one of the heavy metals that is found in industrial wastewater and is very toxic for human and environment. In this work, natural clinoptilolite is used as a low-cost adsorbent for uranium removal from aqueous solutions. The sodium form of clinoptilolite and ZnO/Na-clinoptilolite nanocomposite were prepared. The sample sorption capacities for uranium removal from simulated drinking water in the presence of other anions and cations were investigated. Natural zeolite and its modified forms were characterized by XRD, XRF, FTIR, TEM and BET. Batch experiments were used to determine the best adsorption conditions. The effects of various parameters such as contact time, pH, initial uranium concentration, temperature and mass sorbent on the removal efficiency of uranium ions were studied. The equilibration was attained after 2 and 6 h for the Na-clinoptilolite and ZnO/Na-clinoptilolite nanocomposite, respectively. Both adsorbents showed relatively fast adsorption. Effective removal of uranium was demonstrated at pH values of 4–8 for both forms of zeolite. Temperature had no significant effect on adsorption. The maximum removal efficiency of uranium by the ZnO/Na-clinoptilolite nanocomposite in pH=7.2 and room temperature was 98.55%. Langmuir, Freundlich and Sips models were used for describing the equilibrium isotherms for uranium uptake. The Sips model corresponded well with the experimental data. The thermodynamic parameters, such as ΔG°, ΔH° and ΔS°, have been calculated and interpreted. The pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models were applied to describe the kinetic data. The pseudo-second order kinetic model had excellent kinetic data fitting (R2=1).

References

1. Humelnicu, D., Dinu, M. V., Dragan, E. S.: Adsorption characteristics of UO22+ and Th4+ ions from simulated radioactive solutions onto chitosan/clinoptilolite sorbents. J. Hazard. Mater. 185, 447 (2011).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.053Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Agrawal, A., Sahu, K. K.: Kinetic and isotherm studies of cadmium adsorption on manganese nodule residue. J. Hazard. Mater. B137, 915 (2006).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Zou, W., Bai, H., Zhao, L., Li, K., Han, R.: Characterization and properties of zeolite as adsorbent for removal of uranium (VI) from solution in fixed bed column. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 288, 779 (2011).10.1007/s10967-011-1026-xSearch in Google Scholar

4. Krestou, A., Xenidis, A., Panias, D.: Mechanism of aqueous uranium (VI) uptake by natural zeolitic tuff. Miner. Eng. 16, 1363 (2003).10.1016/j.mineng.2003.08.012Search in Google Scholar

5. Aytas, S. O., Akyil, S., Eral, M.: Adsorption and thermodynamic behavior of uranium on natural zeolite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 260, 119 (2004).10.1023/B:JRNC.0000027070.25215.92Search in Google Scholar

6. Deng, S., Granados-Olivas, A.: Uranium removal from drinking water by adsorption on natural zeolite, Project Number: W-09-02. (2009).Search in Google Scholar

7. Khazaei, Y., Faghihian, H., Kamali, M.: Removal of thorium from aqueous solutions by sodium clinoptilolite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 289, 529 (2011).10.1007/s10967-011-1100-4Search in Google Scholar

8. Akyil, S., Aslani, M. A. A., Eral, M.: Sorption characteristics of uranium onto composite ion exchangers. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 256, 45 (2003).10.1023/A:1023391707606Search in Google Scholar

9. Huang, H., Xiao, X., Yan, B., Yang, L.: Ammonium removal from aqueous solutions by using natural Chinese (Chende) zeolite as adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 175, 247 (2010).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.156Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Abdi, M. R., Shakur, H. R., Saraee, Kh. R. E., Sadeghi, M.: Effective removal of uranium ions from drinking water using CuO/X zeolite based nanocomposites: effects of nano concentration and cation exchange. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 300, 1217 (2014).10.1007/s10967-014-3092-3Search in Google Scholar

11. Sebastian, J., Jinka, K. M., Jasra, R. V.: Effect of alkali and alkaline earth metal ions on the catalytic epoxidation of styrene with molecular oxygen using cobalt(II)-exchanged zeolite X. J. Catal. 244, 208 (2006).10.1016/j.jcat.2006.09.005Search in Google Scholar

12. Bouvy, C., Marine, W., Sporken, R., Su, B. L.: Nanosized ZnO confined inside a Faujasite X zeolite matrix: characterization and optical properties. Colloid Surface A 300, 145 (2007).10.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.12.043Search in Google Scholar

13. Meneau, F., Sankar, G., Morgante, N., Cristol, S., Catlow, C. R. A., Thomas, J. M., Greaves, G. N.: Characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles encapsulated into zeolite-Y: An in-situ combined X-ray diffraction, XAFS, and SAXS study. Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 199, 499 (2003).10.1016/S0168-583X(02)01394-0Search in Google Scholar

14. Dragan, E. S., Dinu, M. V., Timpu, D.: Preparation and characterization of novel composites based on chitosan and clinoptilolite with enhanced adsorption properties for Cu2+. Bioresource Technol. 101, 812 (2010).10.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.077Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, A., Khodabakhshi-Chermahini, F.: Incorporated ZnO onto nano Clinoptilolite particles as the active centers in the photodegradation of phenylhydrazine. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 20, 695 (2014).10.1016/j.jiec.2013.05.035Search in Google Scholar

16. Salama, T. M., Ali, I. O., Gumaa, H. A., Lateef, M. A., Bakr, M. F.: Novel synthesis of nay zeolite from rice husk silica: modification with ZnO and ZnS for antibacterial application. J. Chem. Sci. 7, (2016).10.4172/2150-3494.1000118Search in Google Scholar

17. Padilha, R. S., Lima, A. M. F., Seixas, F. L., Batistela, V. R., Fávaro, S. L., Hioka, N., Machado, N. R. F.: Evaluation of ZnO catalyst supported on zeolite NaA in the photocatalytic degradation of vinasse pretreated by coagulation/flocculation. Chem. Eng. Trans. 32, 823 (2013).Search in Google Scholar

18. Zong, P., Wang, H., Pan, H., Zhao, Y., He, C.: Application of NKF-6 zeolite for the removal of U(VI) from aqueous solution. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 295, 1969 (2013).10.1007/s10967-012-2308-7Search in Google Scholar

19. Barton, C. S., Stewart, D. I., Morris, K., Bryant, D. E.: Performance of three resin-based materials for treating uranium-contaminated groundwater within a PRB. J. Hazard. Mater. 116, 191 (2004).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Yusof, M. A., Malek, N. A.: Removal of Cr(VI) and As(V) from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified zeolite Y. J. Hazard. Mater. 162, 1019 (2009).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.134Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Baruah, S., Pal, S. K., Dutta, J.: Nanostructured zinc oxide for water treatment. J. Nanosci-Nanotech-Asia 2, 90 (2012).10.2174/2210681211202020090Search in Google Scholar

22. Günay, A., Arslankaya, E., Tosun, I.: Lead removal from aqueous solution by natural and pretreated clinoptilolite: adsorption equilibrium and kinetics. J. Hazard. Mater. 146, 362 (2007).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.12.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Faghihian, H., Peyvandi, S.: Adsorption isotherm for uranyl biosorption by Saccharomyces cerevisiae biomass. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 293, 463 (2012).10.1007/s10967-012-1814-ySearch in Google Scholar

24. Camacho, L. M., Deng, S., Parra, R. R.: Uranium removal from groundwater by natural clinoptilolite zeolite: effects of pH and initial feed concentration. J. Hazard. Mater. 175, 393 (2010).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Filippidis, A., Kantiranis, N.: Experimental neutralization of lake and stream waters from N. Greece using domestic HEU-type rich natural zeolitic material. Desalination 213, 47 (2007).10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.602Search in Google Scholar

26. Kilincarslan, A., Akyil, S.: Uranium adsorption characteristic and thermodynamic behavior of clinoptilolite zeolite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 264, 541 (2005).10.1007/s10967-005-0750-5Search in Google Scholar

27. Argun, M. E.: Use of clinoptilolite for the removal of nickel ions from water: kinetics and thermodynamics. J. Hazard. Mater. 150, 587 (2008).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Kaynar, U. H., Ayvacıklı, M., Kaynar, S. C., Hicsonmez, U.: Removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions using nanoporous ZnO prepared with microwave-assisted combustion synthesis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 299, 1469 (2014).10.1007/s10967-014-2919-2Search in Google Scholar

29. Favre-Réguillon, A., Lebuzit, G., Murat, D., Foos, J., Mansour, C., Draye, M.: Selective removal of dissolved uranium in drinking water by nanofiltration. Water Res. 42, 1160 (2008).10.1016/j.watres.2007.08.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Fatima, H., Djamel, N., Samira, A., Mahfoud, B.: Modelling and adsorption studies of removal uranium (VI) ions on synthesised zeolite NaY. Desalination Water Treat. 51, 5583 (2013).10.1080/19443994.2013.769756Search in Google Scholar

31. Han, R., Zou, W., Wang, Y., Zhu, L.: Removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solutions by manganese oxide coated zeolite: discussion of adsorption isotherms and pH effect. J. Environ. Radioactiv. 93, 127 (2007).10.1016/j.jenvrad.2006.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Mahdavi, S., Jalali, M., Afkhami, A.: Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4, ZnO, and CuO nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 14, 846 (2012).10.1007/978-3-319-05041-6_14Search in Google Scholar

33. Limousin, G., Gaudet, J. P., Charlet, L., Szenknect, S., Barthes, V., Krimissa, M.: Sorption isotherms: a review on physical bases, modeling and measurement. Appl. Geochem. 22, 249 (2007).10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.09.010Search in Google Scholar

34. Foo, K. Y., Hameed, B. H.: Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems. Chem. Eng. J. 156, 2 (2010).10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-2-8
Accepted: 2016-6-24
Published Online: 2016-8-6
Published in Print: 2016-11-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ract-2016-2586/html
Scroll to top button