Home Reichenbach’s causal completeness of quantum probability spaces
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Reichenbach’s causal completeness of quantum probability spaces

  • Dominika Burešová EMAIL logo , Kamila Houšková , Mirko Navara , Pavel Pták , Jan Ševic and Michal Slouka
Published/Copyright: August 9, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Reichenbach’s common cause principle (RCCP) is a metaphysical claim about the causal structure of the world. It entails that all correlations can be explained causally either by pointing at the causal connection between the correlated entities or by displaying a common cause of the correlation. We contribute to its mathematical side.

Firstly, after adopting the RCCP axioms, we indicate the importance of positive covariance of events in connection with RCCP. In fact, RCCP is meaningful only for positively correlated events.

Secondly, we find explicit requirements for a state to have a common cause in a quantum logic.

Afterwards, we compare RCCP in the standard (Boolean) case and in the quantum setup that admits new properties of correlation, impossible in the classical case. We show that the notion of maximal correlation differs considerably in these two cases. We answer an open question by providing a counterexample based on a quantum logic given by a free orthomodular lattice.

Subsequently, we find a relation between the Darboux property and RCCP. We invent a new technique for obtaining the central result that atomless σ-complete quantum logics are common cause complete. A variety of new examples is presented.

Finally, we contribute to a fundamental question whether a common cause incomplete quantum logic can be embedded into one that is common cause complete. We contribute by an advanced construction that allows for a positive answer to this question for quantum logics with finitely many atoms and even for some quantum logics with countably many atoms.

MSC 2010: 06C15; 81P05; 81P10

This work was supported by the CTU institutional support (Future Fund).


  1. (Communicated by Anatolij Dvurečenskij)

References

[1] Beran, L.: Orthomodular Lattices. Algebraic Approach, Academia, Prague, 1984.10.1007/978-94-009-5215-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] Brown, J. B.—Humke, P.—Laczkovich, M.: Measurable Darboux functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 102 (1988), 603–610.10.1090/S0002-9939-1988-0928988-5Search in Google Scholar

[3] Buhagiar, D.—Chetcuti, E.: Only ‘free’ measures are admissible on F(S) when the inner product space S is incomplete, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 919–922.10.1090/S0002-9939-07-08982-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] Burešová, D.: Generalized XOR operation and the categorical equivalence of the Abbott algebras and quantum logics, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 62 (2023), Art. No. 98.10.1007/s10773-023-05355-3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Calude, C. S.—Longo, G.: The deluge of spurious correlations in big data, Found. Sci. 22 (2016), 1–18.10.1007/s10699-016-9489-4Search in Google Scholar

[6] De Simone, A.—Navara, M.—Pták, P.: States on systems of sets that are closed under symmetric difference, Math. Nachr. 288 (2015), 1995–2000.10.1002/mana.201500029Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dvurečenskij, A.—Pulmannová, S.: New Trends in Quantum Structures, Kluwer Acad. Publ./Ister Sci., Dordrecht/Bratislava, 2000.10.1007/978-94-017-2422-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] Gleason, A. M.: Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space, J. Math. Mech. 6 (1957), 885–893.10.1512/iumj.1957.6.56050Search in Google Scholar

[9] Greechie, R. J.: On generating distributive sublattices of orthomodular lattices, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 67 (1977), 17–22.10.1090/S0002-9939-1977-0450157-9Search in Google Scholar

[10] Greechie, R. J.: An addendum to “On generating distributive sublattices of orthomodular lattices”, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1979), 216–218.10.2307/2042991Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gudder, S. P.: Stochastic Methods in Quantum Mechanics, North Holland, New York, 1979.10.1016/0034-4877(79)90056-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] Halmos, R. P.: Measure Theory, Litton Educational Publishing, Inc., 1950.10.1007/978-1-4684-9440-2Search in Google Scholar

[13] Halperin, I.: Discontinuous functions with the Darboux property, Canad. Math. Bull. 2 (1959), 111–118.10.4153/CMB-1959-016-1Search in Google Scholar

[14] Harding, J.: Decompositions in quantum logic, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 348 (1996), 1839–1862.10.1090/S0002-9947-96-01548-6Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hofer-Szabó, G.: The formal existence and uniqueness of the Reichenbachian common cause on Hilbert lattices, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 36 (1997), 1973–1980.10.1007/BF02435953Search in Google Scholar

[16] Hofer-Szabó, G.: Reichenbach’s common cause definition on Hilbert lattices, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 37 (1997), 435–443.10.1023/A:1026603809848Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hofer-Szabó, G.—Rédei, M.—Szabó, L. E.: On Reichenbach’s common cause principle and Reichen-bach’s notion of common cause, British J. Philos. Sci. 50(3) (1999), 1995–2000.10.1093/bjps/50.3.377Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hofer-Szabó, G.—Rédei, M.—Szabó, L. E.: Common cause completability of classical and quantum probability spaces, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 39 (2000), 913–919.10.1023/A:1003643300514Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hofer-Szabó, G.—Rédei, M.—Szabó, L. E.: The Principle of the Common Cause, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013.10.1017/CBO9781139094344Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hyčko, M.—Navara, M.: Decidability in orthomodular lattices, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 44 (2005), 2239–2248.10.1007/s10773-005-8019-xSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Kadison, R. V.—Ringrose, J. R.: Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras. Vol. II, American Mathematical Society, 1997.10.1090/gsm/016Search in Google Scholar

[22] Kalmbach, G.: Orthomodular Lattices, Academic Press, London, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kitajima, Y.: Reichenbach’s common cause in an atomless and complete orthomodular lattice, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 47 (2008), 511–519.10.1007/s10773-007-9475-2Search in Google Scholar

[24] Klukowski, J.: On the representation of Boolean orthomodular partially ordered sets, Demonstr. Math. 8 (1975), 405–423.10.1515/dema-1975-0404Search in Google Scholar

[25] Lorenc, P.—Witula, R.: Darboux property of the monotonic σ-additive positive and finitely dimensional vector measures, Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology - Organization & Management Series 1899 (2013), 25–36.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Maňasová, V.—Pták, P.: On states on the product of logics, Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 20 (1981), 451–457.10.1007/BF00671358Search in Google Scholar

[27] Matoušek, M.—Pták, P.: Orthocomplemented difference lattices with few generators, Kybernetika (Prague) 47 (2011), 60–73.10.2478/s12175-010-0033-7Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nădăban, S.: From classical logic to fuzzy logic and quantum logic: A general view, Int. J. Comp. Commun. & Control 16 (2021).10.15837/ijccc.2021.1.4125Search in Google Scholar

[29] Navara, M.—Rogalewicz, V.: The pasting constructions for orthomodular posets, Math. Nachr. 154 (1991), 157–168.10.1002/mana.19911540113Search in Google Scholar

[30] Olejček, V.: Darboux property of finitely additive measure on δ-ring, Math. Slovaca 27 (1977), 195–201.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Pták, P.—Pulmannová, S.: Orthomodular Structures as Quantum Logics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Reichenbach, H.: The Direction of Time, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1956.10.1063/1.3059791Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sikorski, R.: Boolean Algebras, Springer, Heidelberg, 1969.10.1007/978-3-642-85820-8Search in Google Scholar

[34] Solovay, R. M.: Real-valued measurable cardinals. Axiomatic set theory (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XIII, Part I, Univ. California, Los Angeles, Calif., 1967), Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1971, pp. 397–428.10.1090/pspum/013.1/0290961Search in Google Scholar

[35] Suppes, P.—Zanotti, M.: Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of a unique measure strictly agreeing with a qualitative probability ordering, J. Philos. Logic 5 (1976), 431–438.10.1007/BF00649401Search in Google Scholar

[36] Svozil, K.: Quantum Logic, Springer-Verlag, Singapore, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Tkadlec, J.: Conditions that force an orthomodular poset to be a Boolean algebra, Tatra Mt. Math. Publ. 10 (1997), 55–62.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Von Neumann, J.—Beyer, R. T.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition, Princeton University Press, 2018.10.23943/princeton/9780691178561.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[39] Vigen, T.: Spurious Correlations, Hachette Books, New York, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Watanabe, S.: Modified concepts of logic, probability, and information based on generalized continuous characteristic function, Inf. and Control 15 (1969), 1–21.10.1016/S0019-9958(69)90581-6Search in Google Scholar

[41] Wigner, E. P.: Group Theory and its Application to the Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Spectra, Translation from German by J.J. Griffin, Academic Press, New York, 1959.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-11-08
Accepted: 2025-02-20
Published Online: 2025-08-09
Published in Print: 2025-08-26

© 2025 Mathematical Institute Slovak Academy of Sciences

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ms-2025-0055/html
Scroll to top button