Diversity in representing space within and between language communities

References

Ameka, Felix K. & James Essegbey. 2006. Elements of the grammar of space in Ewe. In Stephen C. Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 359–399. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753.011Search in Google Scholar

Blythe, Joe, Kinngirri Carmelita Mardigan, Mawurt Ernest Perdjert & Hywel Stoakes. 2016. Pointing out directions in Murrinhpatha. Open Linguistics 2. 132–159. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2016-0007.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2011. Spatial frames of reference in Yucatec: Referential promiscuity and task-specificity. Language Sciences 33(6). 892–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Stephen C. Levinson. 2011. Framing Whorf: A response to Li et al. (2011). Unpublished manuscript. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo – SUNY. http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/∼rapaport/575/S11/Bohnemeyer_Levinson_ms.pdf (accessed 5 May 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Carolyn O’Meara. 2012. Vectors and frames of reference: Evidence from Seri and Yucatec. In Luna Filipović & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds.), Space and time in languages and cultures: Language, culture, and cognition (Human Cognitive Processing 37), 217–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.37.16bohSearch in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Christel Stolz. 2006. Spatial reference in Yukatek Maya: A survey. In Stephen C. Levinson (ed.). Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 273–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753.009Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Katharine T. Donelson, Randi E. Tucker, Elena Benedicto, Alejandra Capistrán Garza, Alyson Eggleston, Néstor Hernández Green, María de Jesús Selene Hernández Gómez, Samuel Herrera Castro, Carolyn K. O’Meara, Enrique Palancar, Gabriela Pérez Báez, Gilles Polian & Rodrigo Romero Méndez. 2014. The cultural transmission of spatial cognition: Evidence from a large-scale study. In Paul Bello, Marcello Guarini, Marjorie McShane & Brian Scassellati (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. Cognitive Science Society. Available at: https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2014/papers/047/paper047.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Katharine T. Donelson, Randi E. Moore, Elena Benedicto, Alyson Eggleston, Carolyn K. O’Meara, Gabriela Pérez Báez, Alejandra Capistrán Garza, Néstor Hernández Green, María de Jesús Selene Hernández Gómez, Samuel Herrera Castro, Enrique Palancar, Gilles Polian & Rodrigo Romero Méndez. 2015. The contact diffusion of linguistic practices. Language Dynamics and Change 5(2). 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00502002.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Timothy E. Moore (ed.). Cognitive development and the acquisition of language, 27–63. New York: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-505850-6.50008-6Search in Google Scholar

Danziger, Eve. 1999. Language space and sociolect: Cognitive correlates of gendered speech in Mopan Maya. In Catherine Fuchs & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Language diversity and cognitive representations (Human Cognitive Processing 3), 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.3.09danSearch in Google Scholar

Danziger, Eve. 2010. Deixis, gesture, and cognition in spatial frame of reference typology. Studies in Language 34(1). 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.1.16dan.Search in Google Scholar

Dasen, Pierre R. & Ramesh Chandra Mishra. 2010. Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition: An eco-cultural perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761058Search in Google Scholar

de León, Lourdes. 1994. Exploration in the acquisition of geocentric location by Tzotzil children. Linguistics 32(4/5). 857–884.10.1515/ling.1994.32.4-5.857Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, Vivien, Felicity Meakins & Cassandra Algy. 2021. Acquisition or shift? Interpreting variation in Gurindji children’s expression of spatial relations. In Enoch O. Aboh & Cécile B. Vigouroux (eds.), Variation rolls the dice: A worldwide collage in honour of Salikoko S. Mufwene (Contact Language Library 59), 105–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/coll.59.05dunSearch in Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21(1). 461–488. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333.Search in Google Scholar

Edmonds-Wathen, Cris. 2012. Frame of reference in Iwaidja: Towards a culturally responsive early years mathematics program. Melbourne: RMIT University PhD thesis. https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:160446/Edmonds_Wathen.pdf (accessed 25 November 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Gaby, Alice, Joe Blythe & Hywel Stoakes. 2016. Absolute spatial cognition without absolute spatial language. Paper presented at “Geographic grounding: Place, direction and landscape in the grammars of the world”. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, 30–31 May.Search in Google Scholar

Gallistel, Charles Randy. 2002. Conception, perception and the control of action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(12). 504. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02033-8.Search in Google Scholar

Grenoble, Lenore A., Hilary McMahan & Alliaq Kleist Petrussen. 2019. An ontology of landscape and seascape in Greenland: The linguistic encoding of land in Kalaallisut. International Journal of American Linguistics 85(1). 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1086/700317.Search in Google Scholar

Heegård, Jan & Henrik Liljegren. 2018. Geomorphic coding in Palula and Kalasha. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 50(2). 129–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2018.1432210.Search in Google Scholar

Lawton, Carol A. 2001. Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles 44(5/6). 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010981616842.10.1023/A:1010981616842Search in Google Scholar

Le Guen, Olivier. 2011. Speech and gesture in spatial language and cognition among the Yucatec Mayas. Cognitive Science 35. 905–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01183.x.Search in Google Scholar

Levelt, Willem J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 109–169. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. & Penelope Brown. 1994. Immanuel Kant among the Tenejapans: Anthropology as empirical philosophy. Ethos 22(1). 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1994.22.1.02a00010.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. & David Wilkins (eds.). 2006. Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C., Sotaro Kita, Daniel Haun & Björn H. Rasch. 2002. Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84(2). 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00045-8.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83(3). 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00009-4.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Peggy, Linda Abarbanell, Lila Gleitman & Anna Papafragou. 2011. Spatial reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition 120. 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.012.Search in Google Scholar

Lum, Jonathon. 2018. Frames of spatial reference in Dhivehi language and cognition. Melbourne: Monash University PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Meakins, Felicity. 2011. Spaced out: Intergenerational changes in the expression of spatial relations by Gurindji people. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31(1). 43–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2011.532857.Search in Google Scholar

Meakins, Felicity & Cassandra Algy. 2016. Deadly reckoning: Changes in Gurindji children’s knowledge of cardinals. Australian Journal of Linguistics 36(4). 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1169973.Search in Google Scholar

Meakins, Felicity, Caroline Jones & Cassandra Algy. 2016. Bilingualism, language shift and the corresponding expansion of spatial cognitive systems. Language Sciences 54. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.06.002.Search in Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2002. Communities of practice. In John Kenneth Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 528–546. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, George Armitage & Philip N. Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and perception. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674421288Search in Google Scholar

Mishra, Ramesh Chandra, Pierre R. Dasen & Shanta Niraula. 2003. Ecology, language, and performance on spatial cognitive tasks. International Journal of Psychology 38(6). 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000187.Search in Google Scholar

Newcombe, Nora S. 2005. Language as destiny? Or not. Human Development 48(5). 309–314. https://doi.org/10.1159/000086876.Search in Google Scholar

O’Keefe, John. 1993. Kant and the sea-horse: An essay in the neurophysiology of space. In Naomi Eilan, Rosaleen McCarthy & Bill Brewer (eds.), Spatial representation: Problems in philosophy and psychology, 43–64. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1093/oso/9780198238874.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill. 2015. Topography in language: Absolute frame of reference and the Topographic Correspondence Hypothesis. In Rik De Busser & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), Language structure and environment: Social, cultural and natural factors (Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts), 179–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/clscc.6.08palSearch in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill, Jonathon Lum, Jonathan Schlossberg & Alice Gaby. 2017. How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for sociotopography. Linguistic Typology 21(3). 457–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill, Alice Gaby, Jonathon Lum & Jonathan Schlossberg. 2018a. Socioculturally mediated responses to environment shaping universals and diversity in spatial language. In Paolo Fogliaroni, Andrea Ballatore & Elisio Clementini (eds.), Proceedings of workshops and posters at the 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2017), 195–205. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-63946-8_35Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill, Alice Gaby, Jonathon Lum & Jonathan Schlossberg. 2018b. Diversity in spatial language within communities: The interplay of culture, language and landscape in representations of space. In Stephan Winter, Amy Griffin & Monika Sester (eds.), 10th International Conference on Geographic Information Science (GIScience 2018) (Liebniz International Proceedings in Informatics 114), 53:2–53:8. Dagstuhl: Schloss Dagstuhl.Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric. 1993. Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In Andrew U. Frank & Irene Campari (eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS, 294–311. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/3-540-57207-4_20Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric. 2006. Spatial language in Tamil. In Stephen C. Levinson & David Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 400–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753.012Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric, Eve Danziger, David Wilkins, Stephen C. Levinson, Sotaro Kita & Gunter Senft. 1998. Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization. Language 74(3). 557–589. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0074.Search in Google Scholar

Piaget, Jean & Bärbel Inhelder. 1956. The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Polian, Gilles & Jürgen Bohnemeyer. 2011. Uniformity and variation in Tseltal reference frame use. Language Sciences 33(6). 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.010.Search in Google Scholar

Romero-Méndez, Rodrigo. 2011. Frames of reference and topological descriptions in Ayutla Mixe. Language Sciences 33(6). 915–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.06.006.Search in Google Scholar

Schlossberg, Jonathan. 2019. Atolls, islands and endless suburbia: Space and landscape in Marshallese. Newcastle, Australia: University of Newcastle PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Senft, Gunter. 2001. Frames of spatial reference in Kilivila. Studies in Language 25(3). 521–555. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.25.3.05sen.Search in Google Scholar

Shapero, Joshua A. 2016. Speaking places: Language, mind, and environment in the Ancash Highlands (Peru). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Shapero, Joshua A. 2017. Does environmental experience shape spatial cognition? Frames of reference among Ancash Quechua speakers (Peru). Cognitive Science 41(5). 1274–1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12458.Search in Google Scholar

Turk, Andrew G. 2016. A phenomenological approach to trans-disciplinary understanding of landscape as place. In Tim Collins, Gesche Kindermann, Conor Newman & Nessa Cronin (eds.), Landscape values: Place and praxis, 369–374. Galway: Centre for Landscape Studies, National University of Ireland.Search in Google Scholar

Turk, Andrew G., David M. Mark & David Stea. 2011. Ethnophysiography. In David M. Mark, Andrew G. Turk, Niclas Burenhult & David Stea (eds.), Landscape in language: Transdisciplinary perspectives (Culture and Language Use), 25–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/clu.4.03turSearch in Google Scholar

Wassmann, Jurg & Pierre R. Dasen. 1998. Balinese spatial orientation: Some empirical evidence of moderate linguistic relativity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(4). 689–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/3034828.Search in Google Scholar