Conflation of spatial reference frames in deaf community sign languages

References

Arık, Engin. 2008. Locative constructions in Turkish sign language (TİD). In Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 15–31. Petrópolis/ RJ. Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Search in Google Scholar

Arik, Engin & Marina Milković. 2007. Perspective taking strategies in Turkish sign language and Croatian sign language. LSO working papers in linguistics. Proceedings of WIGL 7. 17–31.Search in Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Interaction Studies 9(1). 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.10aro.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Randi Tucker. 2014. Space in semantic typology: Object-centered geometries. In Proceedings of the Freiburg (FRIAS) language and space workshops, 637–666. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110312027.637Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Katharine Donelson, Randi Tucker, Elena Benedicto, Alejandra Capistrán Garza, Alyson Eggleston, Néstor Hernández Green, María de Jesús Selene Hernández Gómez, Samuel Herrera Castro, Enrique Palancar, Gilles Polian & Rodrigo Romero Méndez. 2014. The cultural transmission of spatial cognition: Evidence from a large-scale study. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 36(36). 212–217.Search in Google Scholar

Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Katharine T. Donelson, Randi E. Moore, Elena Benedicto, Alyson Eggleston, Carolyn K. O’Meara, Báez Gabriela Pérez, Gilles Polian & Rodrigo Romero Méndez. 2015. The contact diffusion of linguistic practices: Reference frames in Mesoamerica. Language Dynamics and Change 5(2). 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105832-00502002.Search in Google Scholar

Cerqueglini, Letizia. 2018. Cross-generational changes in linguistic and cognitive spatial frames of reference among Negev Arabic speakers. In ICSC2018 - 7th International conference on spatial cognition. Rome.Search in Google Scholar

Danziger, Eve. 2010. Deixis, gesture, and cognition in spatial frame of reference typology. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language” 34(1). 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.34.1.16dan.Search in Google Scholar

Dasen, Pierre R. & Ramesh C. Mishra. 2010. Development of geocentric spatial language and cognition: An eco-cultural perspective. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511761058Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2014. Demonstratives, frames of reference, and semantic universals of space. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(3). 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12066.Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, Karen, Barbara Tversky & A. Holly Taylor. 2001. Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation 2. 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013118114571.10.1023/A:1013118114571Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, Karen. 1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), Language and space, 171–209. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press.10.2307/j.ctv2rh2b9v.48Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, Karen. 2002. Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Pub.10.4324/9781410603982Search in Google Scholar

Emmorey, Karen & Brenda Falgier. 1999. Talking about space with space: Describing environments in ASL. In Elizabeth A. Winston (ed.), Storytelling and conversation: Discourse in deaf communities, vol. 5, 3–26. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, Nicholas. 2003. Context, culture, and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32(1). 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093137.Search in Google Scholar

Hou, Lynn Yong-Shi. 2016. “Making hands”: Family sign languages in the San Juan Quiahije community. Austin, Texas: University of Texas dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Kisch, Shifra. 2012. Al-Sayyid: A sociolinguistic sketch. In Ursula Zeshan & Connie de Vos (eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (Sign language typology series 4), 365–372. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9781614511496.365Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2003. Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613609Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C., Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun Haun & Björn H. Rasch. 2002. Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning. Cognition 84. 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00045-8.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Peggy & Lila Gleitman. 2002. Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83. 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00009-4.Search in Google Scholar

Liddell, Scott K. 1980. American sign language syntax, vol. 52. The Hague: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783112418260Search in Google Scholar

Majid, Asifa, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel, B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Marsaja, I. Gede. 2008. Desa Kolok: A deaf village and its sign language in Bali, Indonesia. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann. 2010. Verb agreement in sign language morphology. Sign Languages 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712203.010.Search in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(2). 413–450.10.1023/A:1015041113514Search in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2010. Emerging sign languages. Oxford handbook of deaf studies, language, and education 2. 267–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195390032.013.0018.Search in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit, Asaf Israel, Wendy Sandler, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2012. The influence of community on language structure: Evidence from two young sign languages. Linguistic Variation 12(2). 247–291. https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.04mei.Search in Google Scholar

Nonaka, Angela M. 2015. Toponyms in Ban Khor sign language. Learning Communities 16. 66–91. https://doi.org/10.18793/lcj2015.16.06.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill. 2003. Linguistic frame of reference reconsidered. Proceedings of the 2002 conference of the Australian linguistics society, 1–12. Sydney: Macquarie University.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill. 2015. Topography in language. In Rik De Busser & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), Language structure and environment: Social, cultural, and natural factors, 179–226. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, Bill, Jonathon Lum, Jonathan Schlossberg & Alice Gaby. 2017. How does the environment shape spatial language? Evidence for Sociotopography. Linguistic Typology 21(3). 457–491. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2017-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric. 1993. Geographic and manipulable space in two Tamil linguistic systems. In Daniel R Montello (ed.), European conference on spatial information theory, 294–311. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/3-540-57207-4_20Search in Google Scholar

Pederson, Eric. 2006. Spatial language in Tamil. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 400–436. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486753.012Search in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela M. 2007. Space and iconicity in German sign language (DGS). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Radboud University dissertation.10.1075/sll.11.1.17perSearch in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela M. 2012. Use of sign space. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language: An international handbook, 412–431. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.4324/9781315754499-17Search in Google Scholar

Perniss, Pamela M. & Ulrike Zeshan. 2008. Possessive and existential constructions in Kata Kolok. In Ulrike Zeshan & Pamela Perniss (eds.), Possessive and existential constructions in sign languages, 125–150. Nijmegen: Ishara Press.Search in Google Scholar

Poizner, Howard, Edward S. Klima & Ursula Bellugi. 1987. What the hands reveal about the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7206.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pyers, Jennie E., Pamela M. Perniss & Karen Emmorey. 2015. Viewpoint in the visual-spatial modality: The coordination of spatial perspective. Spatial Cognition and Computation 15(3). 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2014.1003933.Search in Google Scholar

Pyers, Jennie E., Shusterman Anna, Senghas Ann, Elizabeth S. Spelke & Emmorey Karen. 2010. Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(27). 12116–12120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914044107.Search in Google Scholar

Revilla, Bettina Renee. 2009. Place names in Israeli Sign Language. Grand Forks, ND: University of North Dakota dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139163910Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(7). 2661–2665. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405448102.Search in Google Scholar

Schuit, Joke, Anne Baker & Pfau Roland. 2011. Inuit sign language: A contribution to sign language typology. Linguistics in Amsterdam 4(1). 1–31.Search in Google Scholar

Senghas, Ann. 1995. Children’s contribution to the birth of Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Senghas, Ann. 2003. Intergenerational influence and ontogenetic development in the emergence of spatial grammar in Nicaraguan sign language. Cognitive Development 18(4). 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2003.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Senghas, Ann. 2010. The emergence of two functions for spatial devices in Nicaraguan sign language. Human Development 53(5). 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321455.Search in Google Scholar

Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American sign language. Noun classes and Categorization 7. 181–214. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.7.13sup.Search in Google Scholar

de Vos, Connie. 2012. Sign-spatiality in Kata Kolok: How a village sign language of Bali inscribes its signing space. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Radboud University dissertation.10.1075/sll.16.2.08vosSearch in Google Scholar

de Vos, Connie. 2014. Absolute spatial deixis and proto-toponyms in Kata Kolok. NUSA: Linguistic Studies of Languages in and around Indonesia 56. 3–26.Search in Google Scholar

de Vos, Connie & Roland Pfau. 2015. Sign language typology: The contribution of rural sign languages. Annual Review of Linguistics 1(1). 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124958.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Hand, head and face-negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology 8(1). 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2004.003.Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2008. Roots, leaves and branches – The typology of sign languages. In Ronnie M de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 671–695. Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Search in Google Scholar

Ulrike Zeshan & Connie De Vos (eds.). 2012. Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights 4. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, and Nijmegen: Ishara Press.10.1515/9781614511496Search in Google Scholar