Home Improving Performance of Optical Networks by Using FRPI Algorithm
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Improving Performance of Optical Networks by Using FRPI Algorithm

  • Reza Poorzare EMAIL logo and Siamak Abedidarabad
Published/Copyright: November 20, 2018
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Optical burst switching (OBS) is a new emerging network that is developing rapidly. By increasing the amount of traffic on the Internet the necessity for having networks like OBS ones that can carry heavy traffic is needed. These networks have an important problem due to being bufferless. The congestion control of the network is a little confusing for some protocols like transport control protocol (TCP) Vegas as they are appropriate for conventional wired networks not optical ones. When a drop happens in OBS networks it can be because of two reasons: 1. congestion and 2. Contention that has been possible due to the bufferless nature of the network. When a contention happens and a packet drops, TCP thinks that the network is experiencing heavy load however it may not, and it decreases the sending rate, as a result, it leads to a reduction in the performance of the network. In this paper, we are trying to improve the performance of the network by employing a new algorithm that called Fuzzy-RTT Performance Improver. This algorithm is based on fuzzy logic and round-trip time measurements. Simulative results show that this algorithm outperforms TCP Vegas in terms of throughput and packet delivery count.

References

1. Jain A, Floyd S, Allman M, Sarolan P. Quick-start for TCP and IP, ICSI, 2006.10.17487/rfc4782Search in Google Scholar

2. Jin C, Wei D, Low S. FAST TCP: motivation, architecture, algorithms, performance, INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Volume:4), March 2004.Search in Google Scholar

3. S. Hegde, David Lapsley, Bartek Wydrowski, Jan Lindheim, David Wei, Cheng Jin, et al. FAST TCP in high-speed networks: an experimental study. In: Proceedings, GridNets, Engineering & Applied Science, Caltech, the First International Workshop on Networks for Grid Applications, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

4. Xu L, Harfoush K, Rhee I. Binary increase congestion control (BIC) for fast long-distance networks. In: Proceedings, INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third AnnualJoint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Volume: 4), March 2004.Search in Google Scholar

5. Stevens W. TCP slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit, and fast recovery algorithms, RFC, 1997.10.17487/rfc2001Search in Google Scholar

6. Mathis M, Mahdavi J, Floyd S, Romanow A. TCP selective acknowledgement options, RFC, 1996.10.17487/rfc2018Search in Google Scholar

7. Brakmo L, Peterson L. TCP Vegas: end-to-end congestion avoidance on a global internet. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun. 1995;13:1465–80.10.1109/49.464716Search in Google Scholar

8. Katabi D, Handley M, Rohrs C. Congestion control for high bandwidth-delay product networks, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication, PA, 2002.10.1145/633025.633035Search in Google Scholar

9. de Dios ÓG, de Miguel I, Durán RJ, Aguado2 JC, Merayo2 N, Fernández P. Impact of TCP synchronization on capacity dimensioning of optical burst switched (OBS) links, Networks and Optical Communications (NOC), 2012.10.1109/NOC.2012.6249938Search in Google Scholar

10. Wang YW. Using TCP congestion control to improve the performance of optical switched networks, communications, 2003. ICC ‘03. IEEE International Conference on (Volume:2), 2002.Search in Google Scholar

11. Yu X, Qiao C, Liu Y. TCP implementations and false time out detection in OBS networks. Infocom. 2004;2:774–84.Search in Google Scholar

12. Zhang Q, Vokkarane V, Wang Y, Jue JP. Analysis of TCP over optical burst-switched networks with burst retransmission. In: Proceedings, IEEE GLOBECOM, St Louis, MO, November 2005.10.1109/GLOCOM.2005.1578012Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhang Q, Vokkarane V, Wang Y, Jue JP. Evaluation of burst retransmission in optical burst-switched networks. In: Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Broadband Networks, BROADNETS, Boston, MA, 2005.10.1109/ICBN.2005.1589624Search in Google Scholar

14. Hsu C, Liu T, Huang N. Performance analysis of deflection routing in optical burst-switched networks, INFOCOM 2002. Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE (Volume:1), New York, NY, June 2002.Search in Google Scholar

15. Shihada B, Zhang Q, Ho P-H, Jue JP. A novel implementation of TCP Vegas for Optical Burst Switched networks, Optical Switching and Networking, 2010.10.1016/j.osn.2010.04.002Search in Google Scholar

16. Sullivan J, Charbonneau N, Vokkarane VM. Performance evaluation of TCP over optical burst switched (OBS) networks using coordinated burst cloning and forward segment redundancy, IEEE Globecom 2010 Proceedings, 2010.10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5683195Search in Google Scholar

17. Sodhatar SH, Patel RB. Throughput based comparison of different variants of TCP in optical burst switching (OBS) network, communication systems and network technologies (CSNT), 2012 International Conference on, 2012.10.1109/CSNT.2012.87Search in Google Scholar

18. Gurel G, Bilkent Univ. A, Karasan E. Effect of number of burst assemblers on TCP performance in optical burst switching networks, broadband communications, networks and systems, 2006. BROADNETS 2006. 3rd International Conference on, 2006.10.1109/BROADNETS.2006.4374326Search in Google Scholar

19. Sullivan J, Ramos P, Vokkarane VM. Unfairness in TCP performance over lossy optical burst-switched (OBS) networks, advanced networks and telecommunication systems (ANTS), 2009 IEEE 3rd International Symposium on, 2009.10.1109/ANTS.2009.5409859Search in Google Scholar

20. Sreenath N, Fernandez TF, Ramachandiran S. Performance analysis of VS nodes in TCP over optical burst switched multicast networks, emerging trends in science, engineering and technology (INCOSET), 2012 International Conference on, 2012.10.1109/INCOSET.2012.6513933Search in Google Scholar

21. Casoni M, Raffaelli C. TCP performance over optical burst-switched networks with different access technologies. IEEE/OSA J Opt Commun Networking. 2009;1:103–12.10.1364/JOCN.1.000103Search in Google Scholar

22. Shihada, B., Pin-Han Ho, Fen Hou, Xiaohong Jiang, Basem Shihada, Pin-han Ho, et al. BAIMD: a responsive rate control for TCP over optical burst switched (OBS) networks, communications, 2006. ICC ‘06. IEEE International Conference on (Volume:6), 2006.10.1109/ICC.2006.255163Search in Google Scholar

23. Poorzare R, Abedidarabad S. Optimizing optical networks by using CWN algorithm. Rev Comput Eng Stud (RCES). 2017;4:98–102.10.18280/rces.040303Search in Google Scholar

24. Poorzare R. TM algorithm to improve performance of optical burst switching (OBS). Int J Res Comput Appl Rob. 2015;3:45–50.Search in Google Scholar

25. Poorzare R, Jamali S, Poorzare A. Maximum burst size adjustment for improving packet delivery ratio in optical burst switching (OBS) networks. Int J Innovative Sci Eng Technol. 2015;2:823–8.Search in Google Scholar

26. Poorzare R, Poorzare A, Abedidarabad S. Improving optical burst switching networks (OBS) performance by adjusting maximum burst size and burstification time. Rev Comput Eng Stud. 2018;5:1–6.10.18280/rces.050101Search in Google Scholar

27. Poorzare R, Jamali S, Bouyer A. New area in optical communication: optical burst switching (OBS) networks. Int J Emerging Trends Technol Comput Sci (IJETTCS). 2014;3:270–3.Search in Google Scholar

28. Poorzare R, Jamali S, Poorzare A. Improving performance of optical burst switching (OBS) networks by burstification time effect. Int J Res Comput Appl Rob. 2015;3:138–43.Search in Google Scholar

29. Peng S, Li Z, Wu X, Xu A. TCP window based dynamic assembly period in optical burst switching network, communications, 2007. ICC ‘07. IEEE International Conference on, 2007.10.1109/ICC.2007.397Search in Google Scholar

30. Raffaelli C, Zaffoni P. Simple analytical formulation of the TCP send rate in optical burst-switched networks, computers and communications, 2006. ISCC ‘06. Proceedings. 11th IEEE Symposium on, 2006.10.1109/ISCC.2006.149Search in Google Scholar

31. Shenai R, Gowda S, Sivalingam KM. Washington state University, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

32. Ns-2. Network Simulator, www.isi.edu.Search in Google Scholar

33. Luo J, Liu X, Fan M. A trust model based on fuzzy recommendation for mobile ad-hoce networks, computer networks, local computer networks, 2008. LCN 2008. 33rd IEEE Conference on, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

34. De Oliveira R, Braun T. A delay-based approach using fuzzy logic to improve TCP error detection in AD HOC Networks, 2004. Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2004. WCNC. 2004 IEEE, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

35. Poorzare R, Jamali S. Optimizing TCP Vegas for optical networks: a Fuzzy Logic approach. Int J Comput Sci Inf Secur (IJCSIS). 2015;13:33–45.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-07-20
Accepted: 2018-11-08
Published Online: 2018-11-20
Published in Print: 2021-07-27

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Amplifiers
  3. Performance Analysis of FBG WDM System using Different Optical Amplifiers
  4. Devices
  5. Performance Evaluation of Two Dimensional Photonic Crystal Based All Optical AND/OR Logic Gates
  6. A Radio over Fiber (RoF) Based Single Sideband Modulated Passive Optical Network (PON) Using Mach Zender Modulator Based on Different Electrical Phase Shifts
  7. Analysis of Hybrid Buffer Based Optical Data Center Switch
  8. An Optical Majority Gate Using Photonic Crystal Based Nonlinear Resonant Cavity
  9. Analysis of AWG-Based Optical Data Center Switches
  10. Fibers
  11. Optimization of Concentration Quenching on Erbium Ytterbium Doped Wave Guide EYDWA Using for Extended Reach up to 160 Km of Hybrid Gigabit Passive Optical Networks and Free Space Optical Technologie “GPON-FSO”
  12. Networks
  13. On the Cost Minimization in Space Division Multiplexing Based Elastic Optical Networks
  14. Systems
  15. Incorporating SDC Module for ISI Compensation for a Long-Haul Co-OFDM System
  16. Performance Analysis of Free Space Optics and Inter-Satellite Communicating System Using Multiplexing Techniques – A Review
  17. To Overcome the Effects of Self-Phase Modulation in Single-Tone RoF System by Employing SSP Compensation Technique
  18. Analysis of Optical Wireless Communication Systems
  19. Investigation of Cross-Phase Modulation-Induced Crosstalk with Sub-Planck Higher-Order Dispersion Parameters in Optical Transmission Systems
  20. Performances Analysis of Novel Proposed Code for SAC-OCDMA System
  21. Design and Implementation of OFDM System using QPSK & QAM
  22. To Mitigate the Effect of Cross-Phase Modulation by Employing PC-DCF Technique in Multi-Tone RoF System
  23. Mitigating the Effects of Non-Linear Distortion Using Polarizers in Microwave Photonic Link
  24. Theory
  25. Improving Performance of Optical Networks by Using FRPI Algorithm
  26. Performance Evaluation of Novel Dynamic Data Replication Algorithm under Optical Burst Switching
  27. Performance Analysis of Relay Assisted Multihop Coherant OFDM System over Malaga Distribution with Pointing Errors
Downloaded on 30.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/joc-2018-0124/html
Scroll to top button