Home The association between socioeconomic status and Chinese secondary students’ English achievement: mediation of self-efficacy and moderation of gender
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The association between socioeconomic status and Chinese secondary students’ English achievement: mediation of self-efficacy and moderation of gender

  • Lihong Ma ORCID logo , Yuhong Jiao , Leifeng Xiao and Jian Liu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 8, 2023

Abstract

This research explored the mediation of self-efficacy and moderation of gender between socioeconomic status (SES) and foreign language (FL) achievement. A total of 8,906 Chinese secondary students (50.7 % males) completed socioeconomic status (SES) questionnaire, English self-efficacy scale, English achievement test, and demographic questionnaire. Multilevel regression model showed that SES was positively associated with English achievement both at student and school levels. The multilevel mediation model demonstrated that English self-efficacy partially mediated the link between SES and English achievement only at student level, and the mediation effect accounted for 30 % of the total effect. Moreover, the link between SES and English achievement was moderately influenced by gender. Specifically, boys’ English achievement was more significantly impacted by SES compared to that of girls. These findings underscore a gender disparity in the impact of SES on FL achievement, advocating for targeted interventions specifically aimed at students from low-SES backgrounds, particularly males.


Corresponding author: Jian Liu, Beijing Normal University, Haidian, 100875 Beijing, China, E-mail:

Funding source: National Research for Educational Examination in China

Award Identifier / Grant number: GJK2021011

Appendix 1: PPS sampling results.

School Class Gender
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Boy Girl
1 20.4 % 17.5 % 21.8 % 15.6 % 14.2 % 10.4 % 52.1 % 47.9 %
2 12.7 % 11.9 % 13.2 % 13.8 % 12.1 % 12.7 % 12.1 % 11.4 % 49.2 % 50.8 %
3 9.7 % 9.7 % 10.2 % 9.9 % 8.8 % 9.4 % 10.5 % 10.5 % 11.1 % 10.2 % 52.8 % 47.2 %
4 13.3 % 13.0 % 13.3 % 15.8 % 15.5 % 13.6 % 15.5 % 43.9 % 56.1 %
5 26.6 % 28.8 % 23.7 % 20.9 % 48.2 % 51.8 %
6 10.5 % 11.2 % 9.7 % 9.7 % 9.9 % 9.0 % 8.5 % 9.5 % 11.0 % 11.0 % 55.0 % 45.0 %
7 6.9 % 7.1 % 8.8 % 8.9 % 8.9 % 9.1 % 8.9 % 7.1 % 8.2 % 8.9 % 8.9 % 8.2 % 49.7 % 50.3 %
8 4.5 % 3.8 % 4.0 % 4.3 % 3.5 % 4.1 % 4.5 % 4.5 % 3.6 % 3.8 % 4.2 % 4.6 % 4.5 % 4.9 % 5.0 % 4.3 % 5.0 % 4.9 % 5.1 % 4.8 % 4.3 % 4.5 % 3.5 % 52.5 % 47.5 %
9 4.3 % 4.6 % 4.1 % 4.6 % 4.8 % 4.4 % 4.6 % 4.4 % 4.6 % 3.8 % 4.6 % 4.0 % 4.2 % 4.5 % 4.3 % 4.3 % 4.3 % 4.7 % 4.2 % 4.4 % 4.2 % 4.4 % 3.8 % 49.9 % 50.1 %
10 17.9 % 18.9 % 19.3 % 18.6 % 12.5 % 12.9 % 57.9 % 42.1 %
11 9.9 % 9.8 % 10.5 % 9.6 % 9.6 % 9.6 % 10.5 % 10.1 % 10.3 % 10.1 % 49.6 % 50.4 %
12 6.9 % 6.7 % 6.7 % 6.6 % 7.8 % 7.6 % 7.8 % 7.4 % 6.6 % 6.7 % 7.2 % 7.4 % 7.2 % 7.4 % 52.6 % 47.4 %
13 12.1 % 13.1 % 12.7 % 12.3 % 13.6 % 11.9 % 11.3 % 12.9 % 49.7 % 50.3 %
14 49.2 % 50.8 % 50.8 % 49.2 %
15 33.7 % 33.7 % 32.6 % 47.4 % 52.6 %
16 28.1 % 28.9 % 22.3 % 20.7 % 52.1 % 47.9 %
17 12.0 % 11.7 % 13.2 % 13.5 % 12.6 % 12.0 % 13.5 % 11.7 % 49.4 % 50.6 %
18 12.7 % 13.0 % 13.8 % 12.3 % 13.6 % 12.3 % 11.0 % 11.3 % 48.8 % 51.2 %
19 16.5 % 17.4 % 15.9 % 15.9 % 17.9 % 16.5 % 45.6 % 54.4 %
20 50.9 % 49.1 % 53.7 % 46.3 %
21 16.5 % 15.4 % 17.6 % 16.5 % 17.0 % 17.0 % 50.0 % 50.0 %
22 12.3 % 13.2 % 12.0 % 12.9 % 13.2 % 11.4 % 11.7 % 13.2 % 51.7 % 48.3 %

References

Aikens, Leona S., Stephen G. West & Raymond R. Reno. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Armor, David J., Gary N. Marks & Aron Malatinszky. 2018. The impact of school SES on student achievement: Evidence from US statewide achievement data. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 40(4). 613–630. https://doi.org/10.3102/016237371878791.Search in Google Scholar

Bai, Barry, Grice Chih Nuo Chao & Chuang Wang. 2019. The relationship between social support, self-efficacy, and English language learning achievement in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly 53. 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.439.Search in Google Scholar

Bai, Barry & Jing Wang. 2021. Hong Kong secondary students’ self-regulated learning strategy use and English writing: Influences of motivational beliefs. System 96. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102404.Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, Albert. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of contro1. New York, NY: Freeman.Search in Google Scholar

Blake, Judith. 1981. Family size and the quality of children. Demography 18(4). 421–442. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060941.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Yuko Goto. 2017. The dynamics of motivation development among young learners of English in China. In Janet Enever & Eva Lindgren (eds.), Early language learning: Complexity and mixed methods, 167–185. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730511.14Search in Google Scholar

Butler, Yuko Goto & Vi-Nhuan Le. 2018. A longitudinal investigation of parental social-economic status (SES) and young students’ learning of English as a foreign language. System 73. 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.005.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Fengqing, Patrick Gerland, Alex R. Cook & Leontine Alkema. 2019. Systematic assessment of the sex ratio at birth for all countries and estimation of national imbalances and regional reference levels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(19). 9303–9311. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908359116.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, Chih Nuo Grace, Dennis M. McInerney & Barry Bai. 2019. Self-efficacy and self-concept as predictors of language learning achievements in an Asian bilingual context. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 28. 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0420-3.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Qishan, Yurou Kong, Wenyang Gao & Lei Mo. 2018. Effects of socioeconomic status, parent-child relationship, and learning motivation on reading ability. Frontiers in Psychology 9. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297.Search in Google Scholar

Chu, Cyrus C. Y., Yu Xie & Ruoh-Rong Yu. 2007. Effects of sibship structure revisited: Evidence from intrafamily resource transfer in Taiwan. Sociology of Education 80(2). 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070708000201.Search in Google Scholar

Darmon, Nicole & Adam Drewnowski. 2015. Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: A systematic review and analysis. Nutrition Reviews 73(10). 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuv027.Search in Google Scholar

Diseth, Age. 2011. Self-efficacy, goal orientations and learning strategies as mediators between preceding and subsequent academic achievement. Learning and Individual Differences 21. 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Downey, Douglas B. 2001. Number of siblings and intellectual development: The resource dilution explanation. American Psychologist 56(6–7). 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.6-7.497.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, Rod. 2008. The study of second language acquisition, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Embretson, Susan E. & Steven P. Reise. 2013. Item response theory. London: Psychology Press.10.4324/9781410605269Search in Google Scholar

Fernald, Anne, Virginia A. Marchman & Adriana Weisleder. 2013. SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science 16(2). 234–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12019.Search in Google Scholar

Gathercole, Virginia C. Mueller, Ivan Kennedy & Enlli Môn Thomas. 2016. Socioeconomic level and bilinguals’ performance on language and cognitive measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19(5). 1057–1078. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000504.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbs, Benjamin G., Joseph Workman & Douglas B. Downey. 2016. The (conditional) resource dilution model: State-and community-level modifications. Demography 53(3). 723–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0471-0.Search in Google Scholar

Gilkerson, Jill, Jeffrey A. Richards, Steven F. Warren, Judith K. Montgomery, Charles R. Greenwood, D. Kimbrough Oller, John H. L. Hansen & Terrance D. Paul. 2017. Mapping the early language environment using all-day recordings and automated analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 26. 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0169.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Suzanne, Robert Woore, Alison Porter, Louise Courtney & Clare Savory. 2020. Navigating the challenges of L2 reading: Self-efficacy, self-regulatory reading strategies, and learner profiles. The Modern Language Journal 104(4). 693–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12670.Search in Google Scholar

Gromada, Anna, Gwyther Rees & Yekaterina Chzhen. 2021. Comparing inequality in adolescents’ reading achievement across 37 countries and over time: Outcomes versus opportunities. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 51(4). 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1640597.Search in Google Scholar

Guo, Jianxiong. 2005. Human capital, the birth rate and the narrowing of the urban-rural income gap. Chinese Social Sciences 3. 27–37.Search in Google Scholar

Hannum, Emily. 2005. Market transition, educational disparities, and family strategies in rural China: New evidence on gender stratification and development. Demography 42(2). 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0014.Search in Google Scholar

Hannum, Emily, Peggy Kong & Yuping Zhang. 2009. Family sources of educational gender inequality in rural China: A critical assessment. International Journal of Educational Development 29(5). 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, Sara A., Stephen A. Petrill, Laura S. DeThorne, Kirby Deater-Deckard, Lee A. Thompson, Chris Schatschneider & Laurie E. Cutting. 2009. Environmental influences on the longitudinal covariance of expressive vocabulary: Measuring the home literacy environment in a genetically sensitive design. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 50(8). 911–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02074.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hoff, Erika, Andrea Burridge, Krystal M. Ribot & David Giguere. 2018. Language specificity in the relation of maternal education to bilingual children’s vocabulary growth. Developmental Psychology 54(6). 1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000492.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Becky, Yung-Hsiang Shawn Chang, Luping Niu & Mingxia Zhi. 2018. Examining the effects of socio-economic status and language input on adolescent English learners’ speech production outcomes. System 73. 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.004.Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, Alexander C., Shawn D. Whiteman, Julia M. Bernard & Susan M. McHale. 2017. Family resource allocation after firstborns leave home: Implications for secondborns’ academic functioning. Family Process 56(3). 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12203.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Sung Won, Hyunsun Cho & Lois Y. Kim. 2019. Socioeconomic status and academic outcomes in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 89(6). 875–916. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319877155.Search in Google Scholar

Kim, Do-Hong, Chuang Wang, Hyun Seon Ahn & Mimi Bong. 2015. English language learners’ self-efficacy profiles and relationship with self-regulated learning strategies. Leaning and Individual Differences 38. 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.016.Search in Google Scholar

King, Ronnel B. & Dennis M. McInerney. 2016. Culturalizing motivation research in educational psychology. British Journal of Educational Psychology 86. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12106.Search in Google Scholar

Kormos, Judit & Thom Kiddle. 2013. The role of socio-economic factors in motivation to learn English as a foreign language: The case of Chile. System 41. 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.006.Search in Google Scholar

Krull, Jennifer L. & David P. MacKinnon. 2001. Multilevel modelling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research 36. 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3602_06.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Yuen Yi & Joanne Chung Yan Chan. 2017. Effects of social persuasion from parents and teachers on Chinese students’ self-efficacy: An exploratory study. Cambridge Journal of Education 47. 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1143448.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Man-Kit & Michael Evans. 2019. Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. The Modern Language Journal 103(4). 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12598.Search in Google Scholar

León, Jaime, Carmen Álvarez-Álvarez & Fernando Martínez-Abad. 2022. Contextual effect of school SES on reading performance: A comparison between countries in the European Union. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 52(4). 674–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2020.1840964.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Meijuan, Mengfei Cai, Haoyu Zhong & Hongyun Liu. 2021. Comparisons of academic achievements of one-only children versus children with siblings in China. Current Psychology 40(11). 5658–5671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01263-5.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Duo, Kevin K. H. Chung & Catherine McBride. 2016. The role of SES in Chinese (L1) and English (L2) word reading in Chinese-speaking kindergarteners. Journal of Research in Reading 39(3). 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12046.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Yixiao, Quanbao Jiang & Feinian Chen. 2020. Children’s gender and parental educational strategies in rural and urban China: The moderating roles of sibship size and family resources. Chinese Sociological Review 52. 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/21620555.2020.1717942.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Hongyun, Qimeng Liu, Xiaofeng Du, Jian Liu & Randall E. Schumacker. 2021. Teacher-student relationship as a protective factor for socioeconomic status, students’ self-efficacy and achievement: A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Current Psychology 42. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01598-7.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Juan, Peng Peng & Liang Luo. 2020b. The relation between family socioeconomic status and academic achievement in China: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review 32. 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09494-0.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzo, Francisco, Adrián Granados & Nuria Rico. 2021. Equity in bilingual education: Socioeconomic status and content and language integrated learning in monolingual Southern Europe. Applied Linguistics 42(3). 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa037.Search in Google Scholar

Lurie, Lucy A., McKenzie P. Hagen, Katie A. McLaughlin, Margaret A. Sheridan, Andrew N. Meltzoff & Maya L. Rosen. 2021. Mechanisms linking socioeconomic status and academic achievement in early childhood: Cognitive stimulation and language. Cognitive Development 58. 101045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101045.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Lihong, Xiaofeng Du, Kit-Tai Hau & Jian Liu. 2018. The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement in Chinese EFL context: A serial multiple mediation model. Educational Psychology 38(5). 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1412400.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Lihong, Leifeng Xiao & Qi Li. 2023. Mediation of self-concept and moderation of teacher support between SES and reading achievement: Evidence from China and the United States. British Journal of Education Psychology 93(4). 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12607.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Lihong, Leifeng Xiao & Jian Liu. 2021. Motivational beliefs of urban and rural students in English as a foreign language learning: The case of China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2021.1991933.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Lihong, Leifeng Xiao, Zhi Liu & Jian Liu. 2022. Teacher-student realtionships moderate the link between socioeconomic status and foreign language learning: Evidence from China. Language Teaching Research 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221122236.Search in Google Scholar

Marks, Gary N. 2015. Are school-SES effects statistical artefacts? Evidence from longitudinal population data. Oxford Review of Education 41(1). 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1006613.Search in Google Scholar

Maxwell, Scott E., David A. Cole & Melissa A. Mitchell. 2011. Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research 46. 816–841. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.606716.Search in Google Scholar

McMullin, Patricia, Frances McGinnity, Aisling Murray & Helen Russell. 2020. What do you do versus who you are: Home-learning activities, social origin and cognitive skills among young children in Ireland. European Sociological Review 36(4). 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa012.Search in Google Scholar

Nikolov, Marianne. 2009. Early modern foreign language programmes and outcomes: Factors contributing to Hungarian learners’ proficiency. In Marianne Nikolov (ed.), Early learning of modern foreign languages, 90–107. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847691477-009Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2019. PISA 2018 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Oyserman, Daphna & Hazel Rose Markus. 2014. The sociocultural self. Psychological perspectives on the self, 4, 187–220. London: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pace, Amy, Rufan Luo, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek & Roberta Michnick Golinkoff. 2017. Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annual Review of Linguistics 3. 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011516-034226.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, Laura B. & Andrew McConney. 2010. Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record 112(4). 1137–1162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512913500394.Search in Google Scholar

Preacher, Kristopher J. & Andrew F. Hayes. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36(4). 717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553.Search in Google Scholar

Raley, Sara & Suzanne Bianchi. 2006. Sons, daughters, and family processes: Does gender of children matter? Annual Review of Sociology 32(1). 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.32.061604.123106.Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, Maya L., McKenzie P. Hagen, Lucy A. Lurie, Zoe E. Miles, Margaret A. Sheridan, Andrew N. Meltzoff & Katie A. McLaughlin. 2020. Cognitive stimulation as a mechanism linking socioeconomic status with executive function: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development 91. 762–779. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13315.Search in Google Scholar

Sayer, Peter. 2017. Does English really open doors? Social class and English teaching in public primary schools in Mexico. System 73. 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

Schunk, Dale H. & Maria K. DiBenedetto. 2020. Self-efficacy and human motivation. Advances in Motivation Science 8. 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.10.001.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, Hye Won & Youngsoon So. 2018. The moderating role of socioeconomic status on motivation of adolescents’ foreign language learning strategy use. System 73. 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Sirin, Selcuk R. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research 75(3). 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417.Search in Google Scholar

Skinner, Chris J. 2014. Probability proportional to size (PPS) sampling, 1–5. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.10.1002/9781118445112.stat03346.pub2Search in Google Scholar

Sobel, Michael E. 1982. Asymtotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In Suzanne Leinhart (ed.), Sociological methodology, 290–312. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.10.2307/270723Search in Google Scholar

Stephens, Nicole M., Hazel R. Markus & Stephanie A. Fryberg. 2012. Social class disparities in health and education: Reducing inequality by applying a sociocultural self model of behavior. Psychology Review 119. 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029028.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Ting & Chuang Wang. 2020. College students’ writing self-efficacy and writing self-regulated learning strategies in learning English as a foreign language. System 90. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102221.Search in Google Scholar

Sutin, Angelina R., Yannick Stephan & Antonio Terracciano. 2018. Parental educational attainment and offspring subjective well-being and self-beliefs in older adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences 128. 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.023.Search in Google Scholar

Todaka, Yuichi. 2017. Self-efficacy of English listening skills in Japanese college learners: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. European Journal of English Language Teaching 2. 93–119. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.321540.Search in Google Scholar

Tracey, Terence J. G. 2002. Development of interest and competency beliefs: A 1-year longitudinal study of fifth- to eighth-grade students using the ICA-R and structural equation modeling. Journal of Counseling Psychology 49(2). 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.2.148.Search in Google Scholar

Trebits, Anna, Martin Jakobus Koch, Katharina Ponto, Ann-Christin Bruhn, Marie Adler & Kristin Kersten. 2022. Cognitive gains and socioeconomic status in early second language acquisition in immersion and EFL learning settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 25. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1943307.Search in Google Scholar

Truong, Thi Nhu Ngoc & Chuang Wang. 2019. Understanding Vietnamese college students’ self-efficacy beliefs in learning English as a foreign language. System 84. 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.007.Search in Google Scholar

Von Stumm, Sophie, Kaili Rimfeld, Philip S. Dale & Robert Plomin. 2020. Preschool verbal and nonverbal ability mediate the association between socioeconomic status and school performance. Child Development 91. 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13364.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Chuang, Do-Hong Kim, Rui Bai & Jiyue Hu. 2014. Psychometric properties of a self-efficacy scale for English language learners in China. System 44. 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.015.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Chuang & Ting Sun. 2020. Relationship between self-efficacy and language proficiency: A meta-analysis. System 95. 102366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102366.Search in Google Scholar

Wen, Zhonglin & Baojuan Ye. 2014. Analyses of mediating effects: The development of methods and models. Advances in Psychological Science 22(5). 731–745. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00731.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Shijing, Shenggang Cai, Guanxing Xiong, Zhiqiang Dong, Huan Guo, Jingshu Han & Tinglin Ye. 2021. The only-child effect in the neural and behavioral signatures of trust revealed by fNIRS hyperscanning. Brain and Cognition 149, in press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105692.Search in Google Scholar

Yeung, Susanna S. S., Ronnel B. King, Ma Jenina N. Nalipay & Yuyang Cai. 2022. Exploring the interplay between socioeconomic status and reading achievement: An expectancy-value perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology 92(3). 1196–1214. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12495.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xue, Yuliya Ardasheva & Bruce W. Austin. 2020. Self-efficacy and English public speaking performance: A mixed-method approach. English for Specific Purposes 59. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, Ningning, Martin Valcke, Annemie Desoete & JeanPierre Verhaeghe. 2012. The quadratic relationship between socioeconomic status and learning performance in China by multilevel analysis: Implications for policies to foster education equity. International Journal of Educational Development 32. 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.004.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-05-31
Accepted: 2023-11-27
Published Online: 2023-12-08
Published in Print: 2025-06-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Unpacking the positioning of being “disengaged” and “disrespectful” in class through nexus analysis: an international student’s navigation of institutional and interactional university norms
  4. Assessing English language learners’ collocation knowledge: a systematic review of receptive and productive measurements
  5. The role of awareness in implicit and explicit knowledge
  6. Intensity of CLIL exposure and L2 motivation in primary school: evidence from Spanish EFL learners in non-CLIL, low-CLIL and high-CLIL programmes
  7. Promoting young EFL learners’ oral production through storytelling: coursebook adaptation in the Vietnamese classroom
  8. Applying embodied meaning of spatial prepositions and the Principled Polysemy model to teaching English as a second language: the case of to and on
  9. The impact of guessing and retrieval strategies for learning phrasal verbs
  10. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality
  11. Examining L2 studentsʼ development of global cohesion and its relationship with their argumentative essay quality
  12. The construct of integrated group discussion (IGD) among undergraduate students: to what extent does group discussion performance reflect performance on IGD tasks?
  13. Discipline-specific attitudinal differences of EMI students towards translanguaging
  14. Relationship between second language vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategy use: a meta-analysis of correlational studies
  15. Evaluative language in undergraduate academic writing: expressions of attitude as sources of text effectiveness in English as a Foreign Language
  16. Investigating optimal spacing schedules for incidental acquisition of L2 collocations
  17. The association between socioeconomic status and Chinese secondary students’ English achievement: mediation of self-efficacy and moderation of gender
  18. Integrated instruction of Appraisal Theory and rhetorical moves in literature reviews: an exploratory study
  19. Scaffolding in genre-based L2 writing classes: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices
  20. Exploring the professional role identities of English for academic purposes practitioners: a qualitative study
  21. The combined effects of task repetition and post-task teacher-corrected transcribing on complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 oral performance
  22. Teacher behaviour and student engagement with L2 writing feedback: a case study
  23. The effect of an intervention focused on academic language on CAF measures in the multilingual writing of secondary students
  24. Which approach best promoted low-proficiency learners’ listening performance: metacognitive, bottom-up or a combination of both?
  25. Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning
  26. The mediating roles of resilience and motivation in the relationship between students’ English learning burnout and engagement: a conservation-of-resources perspective
  27. Student and teacher beliefs about oral corrective feedback in junior secondary English classrooms
  28. The effects of context, story-type, and language proficiency on EFL word learning and retention from reading
Downloaded on 20.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2023-0112/html
Scroll to top button