Home Relationship between second language vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategy use: a meta-analysis of correlational studies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Relationship between second language vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategy use: a meta-analysis of correlational studies

  • Shotaro Ueno ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Osamu Takeuchi ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: December 8, 2023

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs). We conducted a meta-analysis and integrated 159 effect sizes from 25 studies on the correlation between vocabulary knowledge and VLS use. These effect sizes were subjected to a quantitative analysis that measured the extent to which the correlation differed by type of vocabulary knowledge (size vs. depth), vocabulary measurement (size vs. level), and strategy (direct vs. indirect). The results show a small correlation between vocabulary knowledge and VLS use (r = 0.24). The relationship also differed by type of vocabulary knowledge (r = 0.03–0.35 for size; r = 0.15–0.40 for depth), vocabulary measure (r = 0.03–0.43 for size; r = 0.10–0.50 for level), and strategy type (r = 0.03–0.50). The discussion provides possible justifications for the meta-analysis results and recommendations for future VLS studies.


Corresponding author: Shotaro Ueno, Kanda University of International Studies, 1-4-1, Wakaba, Mishima-ku, Chiba, 261-0014, Chiba, Japan, E-mail:

References

Aktar, Tasnima & Dina Strong. 2019. Relationships of international students’ L2 vocabulary, receptive skills, and strategy use: A pathway college context. English Language Teaching 12(10). 65–85. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n10p65.Search in Google Scholar

Alagözlü, Nuray. 2018. Engagement strategies for unknown vocabulary in L2 texts. Idioms. Journal of Language and Linguistics Studies 14(4). 259–271.Search in Google Scholar

Ali, Mohammed A. 2020. Investigation of vocabulary learning strategies to identify word meanings for Saudi EFL students in reading context. AWEJ 11(3). 149–169. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.9.Search in Google Scholar

Amirian, Seyed M. R., Omid Mallahi & Damoon Zaghi. 2015. The relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ self-regulatory vocabulary strategy use and their vocabulary size. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(2). 29–46.Search in Google Scholar

Borenstein, Michael, Larry V. Hedges, Julian P. T. Higgins & Hannah R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.10.1002/9780470743386Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Yunjeong, Dongbo Zhang, Chin-Hsi Lin & Yining Zhang. 2018. Self-regulated learning of vocabulary in English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal 20(1). 54–81.Search in Google Scholar

Chou, Mu-Hsuan. 2022. Validating the vocabulary learning strategies used by English as a foreign language university students in Taiwan. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221074105.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltán & Stephen Ryan. 2015. The psychology of the language learner revisited. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315779553Search in Google Scholar

Faez, Farahnaz, Michael Karas & Takumi Uchihara. 2021. Connecting language proficiency to teaching ability: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 25(5). 754–777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819868667.Search in Google Scholar

Fan, May Y. 2003. Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal 87(2). 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4781.00187.Search in Google Scholar

Faraj, Ismael R. & Kilic Mehmet. 2018. The relationship between language learning strategies and vocabulary size among Iraqi EFL university students. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching 8(4). 21–35. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.8.4.15077.Search in Google Scholar

Goulden, Robin, I. S. Paul Nation & John Read. 1990. How large can a receptive vocabulary be? Applied Linguistics 11(4). 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.4.341.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Carol. 2003. Patterns of language learning strategy use. System 31. 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(03)00048-4.Search in Google Scholar

Griffiths, Carol. 2018. How individual differences relate to successful strategy use: Self-regulated language learners around the world. In Rebecca L. Oxford & Carmen M. Amerstorfer (eds.), Language learning strategies and individual learner characteristics: Situating strategy use in diverse contexts, 55–73. New York, NY: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Peter Y. 2003. Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context and strategies. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal 7.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Peter Y. 2013. Vocabulary learning strategies. In Carol A. Chapelle (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1329Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Peter Y. 2020. Strategies for vocabulary learning. In Webb Stuart (ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies, 271–287. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780429291586-18Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Peter Y. & Robert K. Johnson. 1996. Vocabulary learning strategies and language outcomes. Language Learning 46(4). 643–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01355.x.Search in Google Scholar

Ikeda, Maiko & Osamu Takeuchi. 2006. Clarifying the differences in learning EFL reading strategies: An analysis of portfolios. System 34. 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.04.007.Search in Google Scholar

In’nami, Yo & Rie Koizumi. 2010. Database selection guidelines for meta-analysis in applied linguistics. Tesol Quarterly 44(1). 169–184. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.215253.Search in Google Scholar

Jin, Zhouhan & Stuart Webb. 2021. Does writing words in notes contribute to vocabulary learning? Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211062184.Search in Google Scholar

Juan, Wu Xiao, Mohamad Jafre Zainol Abidin & Lin Siew Eng. 2013. A study on the relationship between English vocabulary threshold and word guessing strategy for pre-university Chinese students in Malaysia. English Language Teaching 6(9). 168–176.10.5539/elt.v6n9p168Search in Google Scholar

Kafipour, Reza, Mehdi Yazdi, Afshin Soori & Nasrin Shokrpour. 2011. Vocabulary levels and vocabulary learning strategies of Iranian undergraduate students. Studies in Literature and Language 3(3). 64–71.Search in Google Scholar

Kalajahi, Seyed A. R. & Bahar Pourshahian. 2012. Vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size of ELT students at EMU in Northern Cyprus. English Language Teaching 5(4). 138–149. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n4p138.Search in Google Scholar

Kırmızı, Özkan. 2014. Measuring vocabulary learning strategy use of Turkish EFL learners in relation to academic success and vocabulary size. World Journal of Education 4(6). 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v4n6p16.Search in Google Scholar

Koizumi, Rie & Yo In’nami. 2013. Vocabulary knowledge and speaking proficiency among second language learners from novice to intermediate levels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 4(5). 900–913. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.900-913.Search in Google Scholar

Kojic-Sabo, Izabella & Patsy M. Lightbown. 1999. Students’ approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. The Modern Language Journal 83(2). 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00014.Search in Google Scholar

Kudo, Mitsuru, Atsushi Mizumoto & Takaaki Kumazawa. 2015. Validation of a vocabulary learning strategy scale and its relationship to vocabulary level test scores. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching 25. 81–111.Search in Google Scholar

LaBontee, Richard. 2019. Questionnaire instrumentation for strategic vocabulary learning in the Swedish as a second language learning context. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 9(2). 313–349. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.2.4.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Jang Ho, Ahn Joung Joo & Lee Hansol. 2021. The role of motivation and vocabulary learning strategies in L2 vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 12(3). 435–458. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2022.12.3.5.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Miao & John R. Kirby. 2015. The effects of vocabulary breadth and depth on English reading. Applied Linguistics 36(5). 611–634.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Shaofeng. 2016. The construct validity of language aptitude. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38(4). 801–842. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226311500042x.Search in Google Scholar

Lipsey, Mark W. & David B. Wilson. 2001. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Xiaofei F. 2018. The relationship between the depth of vocabulary knowledge and Chinese MA students’ use of vocabulary learning strategy and L2 contact in a study-abroad context. Journal of Oan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 22(2). 27–52. https://doi.org/10.25256/paal.22.2.2.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, Qing. 2015. A process-focused learning model for L2 vocabulary acquisition: Construction, implementation and validation. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 166(1). 127–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.166.1.04ang.Search in Google Scholar

Mizumoto, Atsushi. 2010. Exploring the art of vocabulary learning strategies. Tokyo: Kinseido.Search in Google Scholar

Mizumoto, Atsushi. 2012. Exploring the effects of self-efficacy on vocabulary learning strategies. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 3(4). 423–437. https://doi.org/10.37237/030407.Search in Google Scholar

Mizumoto, Atsushi. 2013. Effects of self-regulated vocabulary learning process on self-efficacy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 7(3). 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2013.836206.Search in Google Scholar

Mizumoto, Atsushi. 2018. On questionnaire use in language learning strategies research. The Journal of Asia TEFL 15(1). 184–192. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.1.12.184.Search in Google Scholar

Mother, David, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G. Altman & PRISMA Group. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6(7). e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.Search in Google Scholar

Nation, Paul. 2013. Learning vocabulary in another language, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139858656Search in Google Scholar

Nemati, Majid, Shiva Kaivanpanah & Yasmin Etemadi. 2011. The relationship between the frequency of vocabulary strategy use and breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge of Iranian language learners. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(1). 41–58.Search in Google Scholar

Noprianto, Eko & Pupung Purnawarman. 2019. EFL students’ vocabulary learning strategies and their affixes knowledge. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 15(1). 262–275. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.547730.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2006. The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In John M. Norris & Lourdes Ortega (eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning, 3–50. Amsterdam, NE: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lllt.13.04norSearch in Google Scholar

Onoda, Sakae. 2013. Exploration of the relationships among self-efficacy, self-regulation strategy use, and English vocabulary skills. Studies in Linguistics and Language Teaching 24. 107–125.Search in Google Scholar

Onoda, Sakae. 2014. Examining the relationships between self-efficacy, effort regulation strategy use, and English vocabulary skills. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal 5(4). 357–371. https://doi.org/10.37237/050404.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford, Rebecca L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Dan Brown. 2015. Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research 31(2). 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658314536436.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Frederick L. Oswald. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64(4). 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.Search in Google Scholar

Salim, Nordiana & Hamidah Yamat. 2022. Relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 12(5). 1428–1447.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Nobert. 1997. Vocabulary learning strategies. In Nobert Schmitt & Michael McCarthy (eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy, 199–227. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, Nobert. 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning 64. 913–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077.Search in Google Scholar

Stoeckel, Tim, Stuart McLean & Paul Nation. 2021. Limitations of size and levels tests of written receptive vocabulary knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 43(1). 181–203. https://doi.org/10.1017/s027226312000025x.Search in Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Osamu. 2019. Language learning strategies: Insights from the past and directions for the future. In Xuesong Gao (ed.), The second handbook of English language teaching, 638–702. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_37Search in Google Scholar

Takeuchi, Osamu, Carol Griffiths & Do Coyle. 2007. Applying strategies to contexts: The role of individual, situational and group differences. In Andrew Cohen & Ernesto Macaro (eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice, 69–92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Teng, Feng. 2015. Assessing the relationship between vocabulary learning strategy use and vocabulary knowledge. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand 49. 39–65.10.58837/CHULA.PASAA.49.1.2Search in Google Scholar

Tılfarlıoğlu, F. Filiz Yalçın & Yunus Bozgeyik. 2012. The relationship between vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary proficiency of English language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature 1(2). 91–101. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.2p.91.Search in Google Scholar

Tseng, Wen-Ta, Zoltán Dörnyei & Nobert Schmitt. 2006. A new approach to assessing strategic learning: The case of self-regulation in vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics 27(1). 78–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami046.Search in Google Scholar

Tseng, Wen-Ta & Nobert Schmitt. 2008. Toward a model of self-regulated vocabulary learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Learning 58(2). 357–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00444.x.Search in Google Scholar

Uchihara, Takumi, Eguchi Masaki & Jon Clenton. 2022. The contribution of guessing from context and dictionary use to receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge: A structural equation modeling approach. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221122138.Search in Google Scholar

Uchihara, Takumi, Stuart Webb & Akifumi Yanagisawa. 2019. The effects of repetition on incidental vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. Language Learning 69(3). 559–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12343.Search in Google Scholar

Ueno, Shotaro & Osamu Takeuchi. in press. What vocabulary learning strategies are important and useful among Japanese university students? Using a text mining approach. Vocabulary Learning and Instruction.Search in Google Scholar

Ueno, Shotaro & Osamu Takeuchi. 2022. Self-regulated vocabulary learning in a Japanese high school EFL environment: A structural equation modeling approach. JACET Journal 66. 99–113.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Kai-Hui (Isobel). 2015. The use of dialogic strategy clusters for vocabulary learning by Chinese students in the UK. System 51. 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.004.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Baicheng. 2009. FL vocabulary learning of undergraduate English majors in western China: Perspective, strategy use and vocabulary size. English Language Teaching 2(3). 178–185. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n3p178.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Dongbo & Keiko Koda. 2017. Assessing L2 vocabulary depth with word associates format tests: Issues, findings, and suggestions. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-017-0024-0.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-05-23
Accepted: 2023-11-11
Published Online: 2023-12-08
Published in Print: 2025-06-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Research Articles
  3. Unpacking the positioning of being “disengaged” and “disrespectful” in class through nexus analysis: an international student’s navigation of institutional and interactional university norms
  4. Assessing English language learners’ collocation knowledge: a systematic review of receptive and productive measurements
  5. The role of awareness in implicit and explicit knowledge
  6. Intensity of CLIL exposure and L2 motivation in primary school: evidence from Spanish EFL learners in non-CLIL, low-CLIL and high-CLIL programmes
  7. Promoting young EFL learners’ oral production through storytelling: coursebook adaptation in the Vietnamese classroom
  8. Applying embodied meaning of spatial prepositions and the Principled Polysemy model to teaching English as a second language: the case of to and on
  9. The impact of guessing and retrieval strategies for learning phrasal verbs
  10. Unraveling the differential effects of task rehearsal and task repetition on L2 task performance: the mediating role of task modality
  11. Examining L2 studentsʼ development of global cohesion and its relationship with their argumentative essay quality
  12. The construct of integrated group discussion (IGD) among undergraduate students: to what extent does group discussion performance reflect performance on IGD tasks?
  13. Discipline-specific attitudinal differences of EMI students towards translanguaging
  14. Relationship between second language vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary learning strategy use: a meta-analysis of correlational studies
  15. Evaluative language in undergraduate academic writing: expressions of attitude as sources of text effectiveness in English as a Foreign Language
  16. Investigating optimal spacing schedules for incidental acquisition of L2 collocations
  17. The association between socioeconomic status and Chinese secondary students’ English achievement: mediation of self-efficacy and moderation of gender
  18. Integrated instruction of Appraisal Theory and rhetorical moves in literature reviews: an exploratory study
  19. Scaffolding in genre-based L2 writing classes: Vietnamese EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices
  20. Exploring the professional role identities of English for academic purposes practitioners: a qualitative study
  21. The combined effects of task repetition and post-task teacher-corrected transcribing on complexity, accuracy and fluency of L2 oral performance
  22. Teacher behaviour and student engagement with L2 writing feedback: a case study
  23. The effect of an intervention focused on academic language on CAF measures in the multilingual writing of secondary students
  24. Which approach best promoted low-proficiency learners’ listening performance: metacognitive, bottom-up or a combination of both?
  25. Enhancing young EFL learners’ written skills: the role of repeated pre-task planning
  26. The mediating roles of resilience and motivation in the relationship between students’ English learning burnout and engagement: a conservation-of-resources perspective
  27. Student and teacher beliefs about oral corrective feedback in junior secondary English classrooms
  28. The effects of context, story-type, and language proficiency on EFL word learning and retention from reading
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2023-0100/html
Scroll to top button