Examining L2 studentsʼ development of global cohesion and its relationship with their argumentative essay quality

References

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud & Attila M. Wind. 2025. Dynamic development of cohesive devices in English as a second language writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 63. 433–469. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2022-0205.Search in Google Scholar

Abdi Tabari, Mahmoud, Mark D. Johnson & Mahsa Farahanynia. 2023. Automated analysis of cohesive features in L2 writing: Examining effects of task complexity and task repetition. Assessing Writing 58. 100783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100783.Search in Google Scholar

Baba, Kyoko & Ryo Nitta. 2014. Phase transitions in development of writing fluency from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Learning 64(1). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12033.Search in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2018. Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Individual pathways and emerging group trends. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 28(1). 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12196.Search in Google Scholar

Bulté, Bram & Alex Housen. 2020. A critical appraisal of the CDST approach to investigating linguistic complexity in L2 writing development. In Marjolijn H. Verspoor & Gary G. Fogal (eds.), Complex dynamic systems theory and L2 writing development, 207–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.54.09bulSearch in Google Scholar

Byrnes, Heidi & Rosa Manchón. 2014. Task-based language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tblt.7Search in Google Scholar

Caspi, Tal & Wander Lowie. 2013. The dynamics of L2 vocabulary development: A case study of receptive and productive knowledge. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 13(2). 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-63982013005000002.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Pengyun & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2021. A CDST perspective on variability in foreign language learners’ listening development. Frontiers in Psychology 12(601962). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.601962.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott & Danielle McNamara. 2010. Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency. In Stella Ohlsson & Richard Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the cognitive science society, 984–989. Massachusetts: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott & Danielle McNamara. 2011. Text coherence and judgments of essay quality: Models of quality and coherence. In Laura Carlson, Christoph Hoelscher & Thoma F. Shipley (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the cognitive science society, 1236–1241. Massachusetts: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle & Danielle S. McNamara. 2016a. The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing 32. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A., Kristopher Kyle & Danielle S. McNamara. 2016b. The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods 48(4). 1227–1237. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A., Rod Roscoe & Danielle S. McNamara. 2011. Predicting human scores of essay quality using computational indices of linguistic and textual features. In Gautam Biswas, Susan Bull, Judy Kay & Antonija Mitrovic (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international conference on artificial intelligence in education, 438–440. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_62Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott, Thomas Lee Salsbury & Danielle S. McNamara. 2010a. The role of lexical cohesive devices in triggering negotiations for meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics 18(1). 55–80. https://doi.org/10.5070/l4181005124.Search in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott, Thomas Lee Salsbury & Danielle S. McNamara. 2010b. The development of semantic relations in second language speakers: A case for latent semantic analysis. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7. 55–74.Search in Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees & Diane Larsen-Freeman. 2011. Researching second language development from a dynamic systems theory perspective. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie (eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development, 5–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29.01debSearch in Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees, Wander Lowie & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2005. Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203446416Search in Google Scholar

de Bot, Kees, Wander Lowie & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2007. A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language & Cognition 10. 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728906002732.Search in Google Scholar

DeVillez, Randy. 2003. Writing: Step by step. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2009. Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning 59. 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00542.x.Search in Google Scholar

Foltz, Peter W. 2007. Discourse coherence and LSA. In Thomas K. Landauer, Danielle S. McNamara, Simon Dennis & Kintsch Walter (eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis, 167–184. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Graesser, Arthur C., Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse & Zhiqiang Cai. 2004. Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36(2). 193–202. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195564.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Ruqaiya Hasan. 2014. Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315836010Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Ting, Rasmus Steinkrauss & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2021. Variability as predictor in L2 writing proficiency. Journal of Second Language Writing 52. 100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100787.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Holly L., Stephen A. Zingraf, Deanna R. Wormuth, V. Faye Hartfiel & Jane B. Hughey. 1981. Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Boston: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27(4). 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029.Search in Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Lynne Cameron. 2008. Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2). 200–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00714.x.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Cha & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2023. The development of accuracy and fluency in second language (L2) speaking related to self-efficacy through online scaffolding: A Latent growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 52. 1371–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09950-7.Search in Google Scholar

Lowie, Wander & Marjolijn Verspoor. 2015. Variability and variation in second language acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning 65(1). 63–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12093.Search in Google Scholar

Lowie, Wander M. & Marjolijn H. Verspoor. 2019. Individual differences and the ergodicity problem. Language Learning 69. 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12324.Search in Google Scholar

Manchón, Rosa. 2020. Writing and language learning: Advancing research agendas. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.56Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, Danielle S., Arthur C. Graesser, Philip M. McCarthy & Zhiqiang Cai. 2014. Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. London: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511894664Search in Google Scholar

Molenaar, Peter C. M. 2008. On the implications of the classical ergodic theorems: Analysis of developmental processes has to focus on intra-individual variation. Developmental Psychobiology 50(1). 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20262.Search in Google Scholar

Myhill, Debra. 2008. Towards a linguistic model of sentence development in writing. Language & Education 22(5). 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152655.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044.Search in Google Scholar

Polat, Brittany & Youjin Kim. 2014. Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics 35(2). 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt013.Search in Google Scholar

Rosmawati, Rosmawati. 2014. Dynamic development of complexity and accuracy: A case study in second language academic writing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 37(2). 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.37.2.01ros.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Monika S., Marjolijn Verspoor & Brian MacWhinney. 2011. Coding and extracting data. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie (eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29.03schSearch in Google Scholar

Sun, Peijian Paul & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2023. Speech competence and speech performance: A dual approach to understanding Chinese-as-a-second language learners’ speech production ability. Journal of Second Language Studies 6(1). 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.22002.jun.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Qiyu & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2023. Examining the effects of English as a foreign language student-writersʼ metacognitive experiences on their writing performance. Current Psychology 42. 23743–23758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03416-0.Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, Esther & Lindda B. Smith. 1994. A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2524.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tian, Yu, Minkyung Kim, Crossley Scott & Qian Wan. 2021. Cohesive devices as an indicator of L2 studentsʼ writing fluency. Reading & Writing 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10229-3.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Marijn, Marjolijn H. Verspoor & Wander Lowie. 2011. Variability and DST. In Marjolijn Verspoor, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie (eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods & techniques, 55–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29.04vanSearch in Google Scholar

van Geert, Paul & Marijn van Dijk. 2002. Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development 25(4). 340–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-6383(02)00140-6.Search in Google Scholar

Vercellotti, Mary Lou. 2017. The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language performance: A longitudinal study. Applied Linguistics 38(1). 90–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv002.Search in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Kees de Bot & Wander Lowie. 2011. A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.29Search in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Wander Lowie & Marijn van Dijk. 2008. Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. The Modern Language Journal 92(2). 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x.Search in Google Scholar

Verspoor, Marjolijn & Marijn van Dijk. 2013. Variability in a dynamic systems approach to second language acquisition. In Carol Chapel (ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, 6051–6059. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1251Search in Google Scholar

Vyatkina, Nina. 2012. The development of second language writing complexity in groups and individuals: A longitudinal learner corpus study. The Modern Language Journal 96(4). 576–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01401.x.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Ting Sophia, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Janet S. Gaffney. 2022. Examining the relative effectiveness of task complexity and cognitive demands on studentsʼ writing in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. 44(2). 320–353.10.1017/S0272263121000310Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Wenxing & Ying Sun. 2012. The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics & Education 23(1). 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Yingli, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Ling Chen. 2019. Effects of recasts and form-focused instruction on the acquisition of novel vocabulary. Applied Linguistics Review 10(4). 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0084.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Hanjing & Wander Lowie. 2019. Dynamic paths of complexity and accuracy in second language speech: A longitudinal case study of Chinese learners. Applied Linguistics 41(6). 855–877. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz040.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Jianhua. 2018. The effect of strategic planning training on cohesion in EFL learnersʼ essays. Reading & Writing Quarterly 34(6). 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2018.1506371.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Hao & Monique Bournot-Trites. 2021. The long-term washback effects of the National Matriculation English Test on college English learning in China: Tertiary student perspectives. Studies In Educational Evaluation 68. 100977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100977.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Jianhua & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2021. A Dynamic Systems Theory perspective on the variability in learners’ development of syntactic complexity in EFL writing. Chinese Journal of Second Language Writing 2(1). 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Jianhua & Lawrence Jun Zhang. 2023. Lexical cohesion development in L2 argumentative writing: A latent class growth model approach. Linguistics and Education 78(101255). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101255.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lawrence Jun. 2010. A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university studentsʼ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly 44(2). 320–353. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lawrence Jun. 2021. Crossing literacy borders through writing: Transformational apprenticeship and repositioning of EAL learners. In Anne Golden, Lars Anders Kulbrandstad & Lawrence Jun Zhang (eds.), Crossing borders, writing texts, being evaluated: Cultural and disciplinary norms in academic writing, 147–163. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.2307/jj.22730578.13Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Lawrence Jun & Donglan Zhang. 2013. Thinking metacognitively about metacognition in second and foreign language learning, teaching, and research: Toward a dynamic metacognitive systems perspective. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies 396(12). 111–121.Search in Google Scholar

Zheng, Yongyan. 2016. The complex, dynamic development of L2 lexical use: A longitudinal study on Chinese learners of English. System 56. 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.11.007.Search in Google Scholar