Comparing motivational features between feedback givers and receivers in English speaking class

References

Ahlquist, Sharon. 2019. Motivating teens to speak English through group work in Storyline. ELT Journal 73(4). 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz023.Search in Google Scholar

Allwright, Dick. 2003. Exploratory practice: Rethinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research 7. 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168803lr118oa.Search in Google Scholar

Armengol-Asparó, Carme, Cristina Mercader & Georgeta Ion. 2020. Making peer-feedback more efficient: What conditions of its delivery make the difference? Higher Education Research & Development 41. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1840527.Search in Google Scholar

Bannert, Maria, Peter Reimann & Christoph Sonnenberg. 2014. Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning 9(2). 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9107-6.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, John & Vicki Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed-methods research, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Zoltan & Ema Ushioda. 2021. Teaching and researching motivation, 3rd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781351006743-2Search in Google Scholar

Ertmer, Peggy A., Jennifer C. Richardson, James D. Lehman, Timothy J. Newby, Carol Cheng, Christopher Mong & Ayesha Sadaf. 2010. Peer feedback in a large undergraduate blended course: Perceptions of value and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research 43(1). 67–88. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.43.1.e.Search in Google Scholar

Fan, Yumei & Jinfei Xu. 2020. Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 50. 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775.Search in Google Scholar

Gaynor, James. 2020. Peer review in the classroom: Student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45(5). 758–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1697424.Search in Google Scholar

Huisman, Bart, Nadira Saab, Jan van Driel & Paul van den Broek. 2018. Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(6). 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken & Fiona Hyland. 2006. Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching 39. 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444806003399.Search in Google Scholar

Kasch, Julia, Peter Van Rosmalen, Maartje Henderikx & Marco Kalz. 2021. The factor structure of the peer-feedback orientation scale (PFOS): Toward a measure for assessing students’ peer-feedback dispositions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1893650 (Epub ahead of print).Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, Julia & Christian Schunn. 2010. Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science 39(3). 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Ricky. 2010. A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer feedback. TESL Canada Journal 27(2). 114. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Man-Kit & Michael Evans. 2019. Investigating the operating mechanisms of the sources of L2 writing self-efficacy at the stages of giving and receiving peer feedback. The Modern Language Journal 103(4). 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12598.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Hongli, Yao Xiong, Charles Vincent Hunter, Xiuyan Guo & Rurik Tywoniw. 2020. Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 45. 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Yong Yan, Margaret Cargill, Xin Gao, Xiaoqing Wang & Patrick O’Connor. 2019. A scientist in interdisciplinary team-teaching in an English for research publication purposes classroom: Beyond a “cameo role”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 40. 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.005.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Jun & Jette Hansen. 2002. Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.10.3998/mpub.8952Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Ngar-Fun & David Carless. 2006. Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education 11(3). 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Xiqin, Dongping Zheng & Yushuai Chen. 2019. Latent classes of smartphone dictionary users among Chinese EFL learners: A mixed-method inquiry into motivation for mobile assisted language learning. International Journal of Lexicography 32(1). 68–91.10.1093/ijl/ecy019Search in Google Scholar

London, Manuel & James Smither. 2002. Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review 12(1). 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-4822(01)00043-2.Search in Google Scholar

Patchan, Melissa & Christian Shunn. 2015. Understanding the benefits of providing peer feedback: How students respond to peers’ texts of varying quality. Instruction Science 43(5). 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9353-x.Search in Google Scholar

Patri, Mrudula. 2002. The influence of peer feedback on self-and peer-assessment of oral skills. Language Testing 19(2). 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt224oa.Search in Google Scholar

Strijbos, Jan-Willem, Susanne Narciss & Katrin Dünnebier. 2010. Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level inacademic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction 20(4). 291–303.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Su, Wei. 2019. Interpreting quality as assessed by peer students. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer 13(2). 177–189.10.1080/1750399X.2018.1564192Search in Google Scholar

Su, Wei & Axian Huang. 2021. More enjoyable to give or to receive? Exploring students’ emotional status in their peer feedback of academic writing. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2004389.Search in Google Scholar

Sukumaran, Kavitha & Rozita Dass. 2014. Students’ perspectives on the use of peer feedback in an English as a second language writing class. Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Education 4(1). 27–40. https://doi.org/10.7603/s40933-014-0003-3.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, Scott, Manuel Pérez-Quiñones, Stephen Edwards & Joseph Chase. 2011. Student attitudes and motivation for peer review in CS2. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on computer science education, 347–352. New York, NY, United States: Association for Computing Machinery.10.1145/1953163.1953268Search in Google Scholar

Van Gennip, Nannie, Mien Segers & Harm Tillema. 2010. Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction 20(4). 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010.Search in Google Scholar

Vonkova, Hana, Jane Jones, Angie Moore, Irem Altinkalp & Hasan Selcuk. 2021. A review of recent research in EFL motivation: Research trends, emerging methodologies, and diversity of researched populations. System 103. 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102622.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev. 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Zengqi 汪曾祺. 2011. 受戒、异禀 Shoujie and Yibing. The love story of a young monk; special gift. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xie, Kui. 2013. What do the numbers say? The influence of motivation and peer feedback on students’ behaviour in online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology 44(2). 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01291.x.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Xue, Yuliya Ardasheva & Bruce Austin. 2020. Self-efficacy and English public speaking performance: A mixed method approach. English for Specific Purposes 59. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Jiming, Yongyan Zheng & Joanna Hong-Meng Tai. 2020. Grudges and gratitude: The social-affective impacts of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45(3). 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1643449.Search in Google Scholar

Zhu, Qiyun & David Carless. 2018. Dialogue within peer feedback processes: Clarification and negotiation of meaning. Higher Education Research & Development 37(4). 883–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446417.Search in Google Scholar

Zou, Shen & Wenxing Zhang. 2017. Exploring the adaptability of the CEFR in the construction of a writing ability scale for test for English majors. Language Testing in Asia 7. 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0050-3.Search in Google Scholar