Abstract
In the field of second language (L2) fluency, there is a common adherence to quantitative methods to examine characteristics and features of speech. This study extends the field by reporting on an investigation that analyzed native-speaker listeners’ perceptions of L2 fluency in French from a qualitative perspective. Three untrained judges rated students’ performance on speech tasks varying in cognitive demand and provided justifications for their perceptions of fluency. The goal of the research was to examine the factors that affect raters’ evaluations of fluency in response to three oral performances from 40 adult learners of French of varying proficiency. Qualitative analysis revealed that the main speech features that influenced native listeners’ perceptions of L2 fluency were speed, rhythm, pause phenomena, self-correction and efficiency/effortlessness in word choice, but also in target-like rhythm and prosody. The results of using such qualitative methodology highlights the important role that rhythm plays in fluency judgements in syllable-timed languages such as French, a factor which has not always been given much prominence in previous L2 fluency quantitative research.
References
Abercrombie, David. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Chicago: Aldine.Search in Google Scholar
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. 2012. ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines. Alexandria, VA.Search in Google Scholar
Bosker, Hans, Anne-France Pinget, Hugo Quené, Ted Sanders & Nivja H. De Jong. 2013. What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing 30 (2).159–175.10.1177/0265532212455394Search in Google Scholar
Brumfit, Christopher. 1984/2000. Accuracy and fluency: The basic polarity. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 61–73. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Citizenship and Immigration Canada. 2012. Canadian Language Benchmarks: English as a second language for adults. Ottawa, Ontario.Search in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2002. Speaking in time. Speech Communication 36(1). 5–13.10.1016/S0167-6393(01)00022-XSearch in Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. & Jean E.Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84(1). 73–111.10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3Search in Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference of languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Cucchiarini, Catia, Helmer Strik & Lou Boves. 2002. Quantitative assessment of second language learners’ fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 11 (6). 2862–2873.10.1121/1.1471894Search in Google Scholar
Delattre, Pierre. 1961. La leçon d’intonation de Simone de Beauvoir, Étude d’intonation déclarative comparée. The French Review 35(1). 59–67.10.1515/9783112416105-010Search in Google Scholar
Derwing, Tracey M., Marian J. Rossiter, Murray J. Munro & Ron I. Thomson. 2004. Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning 54(3). 655–679.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán. 1995. On the teachability of communication strategies. TESOL Quarterly 29(1). 55–85.10.2307/3587805Search in Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán & Judit Kormos. 1998. Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20(3). 349–385.10.1017/S0272263198003039Search in Google Scholar
Ejzenberg, Roseli. 2000. The juggling act of oral fluency: A psycho-sociolinguistic metaphor. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 287–313. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 2000. On fluency. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 43–60. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Foster, Pauline & Peter Skehan. 1999. The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research 3(2). 215–247.10.1177/136216889900300303Search in Google Scholar
Freed, Barbara. 2000. Is fluency, like beauty, in the eyes and ears of the beholder? In H. Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 243–265. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Freed, Barbara, Norman Segalowitz & Dan P. Dewey. 2004. Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26(2). 275–301.10.1017/S0272263104262064Search in Google Scholar
Ginther, April, Slobodanka Dimova & Rui Yang. 2010. Conceptual and empirical relationships between temporal measures of fluency and oral English proficiency with implications for automated scoring. Language Testing 27(3). 379–399.10.1177/0265532210364407Search in Google Scholar
Iwashita, Noriko, Annie Brown, Tim McNamara & Sally O’Hagan. 2008. Assessed levels of second language speaking proficiency: How distinct? Applied Linguistics 29(1). 24–49.10.1093/applin/amm017Search in Google Scholar
Kormos, Judit. 2000. The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning 50(2). 343–384.10.1111/0023-8333.00120Search in Google Scholar
Kormos, Judit. 2006. Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar
Kormos, Judit & Mariann Dénes. 2004. Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System 32(2). 145–164.10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001Search in Google Scholar
Lam, Wendy Y.K. 2006. Gauging the effects of ESL oral communication strategy teaching: A multi-method approach. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching 3(2). 142–157.Search in Google Scholar
Lennon, Paul. 1990. Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning 40(3). 387–417.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1990.tb00669.xSearch in Google Scholar
Lennon, Paul. 2000. The lexical element in spoken second language fluency. In Hedi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 25–42. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem. J. M. 1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar
Munro, Murray J. & Traxey M. Derwing. 2001. Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech: The role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 23(4). 451–468.10.1017/S0272263101004016Search in Google Scholar
Nakatani, Yasuo. 2005. The effects of awareness-raising training on oral communication strategy use. The Modern Language Journal 89(1). 76–91.10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00266.xSearch in Google Scholar
Nakatani, Yasuo. 2010. Identifying strategies that facilitate EFL learners’ oral communication: A classroom study using multiple data collection procedures. The Modern Language Journal 94(1). 116–136.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00987.xSearch in Google Scholar
Olynyk, Marian, Alison D’Anglejan & David Sankoff. 1990. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of speech markers in the native and second language speech of bilinguals. In Robin C. Scarcella, Elaine S. Andersen, & Stephen D. Krashen (eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language, 139–155. Rowley: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Frances Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack Richards & Richard Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. New York: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew & Frances Syder. 2000. The One-Clause-at-a-Time Hypothesis. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 163–199. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Pell, Marc. 2001. Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(4). 1668–1680.10.1121/1.1352088Search in Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1945. Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Poulisse, Nanda. 1993. A theoretical account of lexical communication strategies. In Robert Schreuder & Bert Weltens (eds.), The bilingual lexicon, 157–189. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil.6.09pouSearch in Google Scholar
Price, Glanville. 2005. An introduction to French pronunciation. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470774014Search in Google Scholar
Préfontaine, Yvonne. 2013. Perceptions of French fluency in second language speech production. Canadian Modern Language Review 69(3). 324–348.10.3138/cmlr.1748Search in Google Scholar
Préfontaine, Yvonne & Judit Kormos. 2015. The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. The Modern Language Journal 99(1). 96–112.10.1111/modl.12186Search in Google Scholar
Préfontaine, Yvonne, Judit Kormos & Daniel E. Johnson. 2015. How do utterance measures predict raters’ perceptions of fluency in French as a second language? Language Testing 1–21. doi:10.1177/0265532215579530Search in Google Scholar
Raupach, Manfred. 1980. Temporal variables in first and second language speech production. In Hans. W. Dechert & Manfred Raupach (eds.), Temporal variables in speech, 263–270. Mouton: The Hague.10.1515/9783110816570.263Search in Google Scholar
Raupach, Manfred. 1987. Procedural learning in advanced learners of a foreign language. In James A. Coleman & Richard Towell (eds.), The advanced language learner. 123–155. London: CILT.Search in Google Scholar
Riggenbach, Heidi. 1991. Toward an understanding of fluency: A microanalysis of nonnative speaker conversations. Discourse Processes 14(4). 423–441.10.1080/01638539109544795Search in Google Scholar
Rubin, Herbert J. & Irene S. Rubin. 2005. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.10.4135/9781452226651Search in Google Scholar
Sajavaara, Kari. 1987. Second language speech production: Factors affecting fluency. In Hans Dechert & Manfred Raupach (eds.), Psycholinguistic models of production. 45–65. Norwood: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt, Richard. 1992. Psychological mechanisms underlying second language fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 14(3). 357–385.10.1017/S0272263100011189Search in Google Scholar
Schwab, Sandra & François, Grosjean. 2004. La perception du débit en langue seconde. Phonetica 61(1). 84–94.10.1159/000082558Search in Google Scholar
Segalowitz, Norman. 2010. Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203851357Search in Google Scholar
Tavakoli, Parvaneh & Peter Skehan. 2005. Strategic planning, task structure and performance testing. In Rod Ellis (ed.), Planning and task performance in a L2, 239–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.11.15tavSearch in Google Scholar
Towell, Richard. 2002. Relative degrees of fluency: A comparative case study of advanced learners of French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 40(1). 117–150.10.1515/iral.2002.005Search in Google Scholar
Towell, Richard, Roger Hawkins & Nives Bazergui. 1996. The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics 17(1). 84–119.10.1093/applin/17.1.84Search in Google Scholar
Vaissière, Jacqueline. 1991. Rhythm, accentuation and final lengthening in French. In Johan Sundberg, Lennart Nord & Rolf Carlson (eds.), Music, language, speech and brain, 108–120. Stockholm: Macmillan Press.10.1007/978-1-349-12670-5_10Search in Google Scholar
Walker, Douglas. 2001. French sound structure. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.10.2307/j.ctv6gqrmvSearch in Google Scholar
Wenk, Brian & Wioland, François. 1982. Is French really syllable–timed? Journal of Phonetics 10(2). 193–216.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30957-XSearch in Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann. 2000. The role of intonation in second language fluency. In Heidi Riggenbach (ed.), Perspectives on fluency, 102–127. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Wennerstrom, Ann. 2001. The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring L2 speech fluency
- Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants
- Ladders and Snakes in Second Language Fluency
- Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: the effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency
- Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency
- A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- New directions and developments in defining, analyzing and measuring L2 speech fluency
- Second language fluency and its underlying cognitive and social determinants
- Ladders and Snakes in Second Language Fluency
- Predicting pauses in L1 and L2 speech: the effects of utterance boundaries and word frequency
- Fluency in monologic and dialogic task performance: Challenges in defining and measuring L2 fluency
- A qualitative analysis of perceptions of fluency in second language French