Home A sociosemiotic exploration of medical legislation reform in China (1990–2021)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A sociosemiotic exploration of medical legislation reform in China (1990–2021)

  • Junfeng Zhao

    Junfeng Zhao, PhD in forensic linguistics, is Professor and Director of Centre for Translation Studies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (GDUFS). He is the Secretary General of the third China National Committee for Translation and Interpreting Education, Vice President of WITTA, Vice Director of Legal Translation Committee of TAC, Vice Chairman of Translators Association of Guangdong Province, China. From 2014 to 2018 he was the dean of the School of Interpreting and Translation Studies (SITS), GDUFS. He has published extensively in translation and interpreting studies, especially in legal translation and court interpreting domains.

    ORCID logo
    , Jingjing Wu

    Jingjing Wu is Associate Professor and Vice Dean of the School of Foreign Studies at Guangxi University of Science and Technology. Her research interests include legal discourse and translation, institutional discourse and sociolinguistics.

    ORCID logo EMAIL logo
    and Yi Yang

    Yi Yang is Professor and Vice Dean of the School of Economics and Management at Guangxi University of Science and Technology. He studied finance at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. He is mainly engaged in the research of corporate finance, banking and stock market. He is Vice Chairman of Liuzhou Institute of Finance, Director of Liuzhou Institute of Accounting, and member of the Guangxi Teaching Guidance Committee for Economics and Finance Major of Colleges.

    ORCID logo
Published/Copyright: November 24, 2021

Abstract

The medical service system is an important guarantee for human rights to survival, health and development of every social member, and thus it is significant to explore, interpret and explain the diachronic construction for its legislative reform. In a corpus approach, the study firstly collects the medical-related statutes from 1990 to 2021 in China to build the P.R.C. Medical Legislation Corpus (PRCMLC), and analyzes the keywords and their collocation in the exploratory, explosive and expanding phase of the medical legislative reform. Secondly, from the perspectives of sociosemiotics, the PRCMLC data is combined with the concrete medical laws and regulations for further discussion of the MSS, MIS, DSS and PHS in legislative system. Thirdly, the study explores the core legislative ideas and the relationships among the subsystems in the diachronic analysis, which provide a general overview of the legislative objects, target, participants and mechanisms in the medical reform of China.


Corresponding author: Jingjing Wu, School of Foreign Studies, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, Liuzhou, China, E-mail:

About the authors

Junfeng Zhao

Junfeng Zhao, PhD in forensic linguistics, is Professor and Director of Centre for Translation Studies, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (GDUFS). He is the Secretary General of the third China National Committee for Translation and Interpreting Education, Vice President of WITTA, Vice Director of Legal Translation Committee of TAC, Vice Chairman of Translators Association of Guangdong Province, China. From 2014 to 2018 he was the dean of the School of Interpreting and Translation Studies (SITS), GDUFS. He has published extensively in translation and interpreting studies, especially in legal translation and court interpreting domains.

Jingjing Wu

Jingjing Wu is Associate Professor and Vice Dean of the School of Foreign Studies at Guangxi University of Science and Technology. Her research interests include legal discourse and translation, institutional discourse and sociolinguistics.

Yi Yang

Yi Yang is Professor and Vice Dean of the School of Economics and Management at Guangxi University of Science and Technology. He studied finance at Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. He is mainly engaged in the research of corporate finance, banking and stock market. He is Vice Chairman of Liuzhou Institute of Finance, Director of Liuzhou Institute of Accounting, and member of the Guangxi Teaching Guidance Committee for Economics and Finance Major of Colleges.

References

Bhatia, Vijay K. & Christopher N. Candlin. 2008. Interpretation across legal systems and cultures: A critical perspective. In Vijay K. Bhatia, Christopher N. Candlin & Engberg Jan (eds.), Legal discourse across cultures and systems, 127–143. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.10.5790/hongkong/9789622098510.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804489Search in Google Scholar

Calum, Paton. 2016. The politics of health policy reform in the UK. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/978-1-137-47343-1Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Winnie Cheng. 2012. Legal interpretation: Meaning as social construction. Semiotica 192. 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0086.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Winnie Cheng. 2014. Documentary evidence as hegemonic reconstruction. Semiotica 200. 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2014-0009.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Mingyu Gong & Jian Li. 2016. Equivalence in legal translation: From a sociosemiotic perspective. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 4. 77–90.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Zhe, Wang Huanming, Xiong Wei, Zhu Dajian & Cheng Le. 2021. Public–private partnership as a driver of sustainable development: Toward a conceptual framework of sustainability-oriented PPP. Environment, Development and Sustainability 23. 1043–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00576-1.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Shifeng Ni, King K. Sin & Winnie Cheng. 2012. A sociosemiotic approach to fundamental rights in China. Semiotica 190. 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2012-0038.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Jiamin Pei. 2018. Interpreting cybersecurity law: A semiotic perspective. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences) 48(6). 121–139.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Jiamin Pei & Marcel Danesi. 2019. A sociosemiotic interpretation of cybersecurity in US legislative discourse. Social Semiotics 29(3). 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587843.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le, Lijin Sha & Yinglong Zheng. 2009. A semiotic interpretation of legal terms. Contemporary Rhetoric 2. 37–43.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & King K. Sin. 2011. A sociosemiotic interpretation of linguistic modality in legal settings. Semiotica 185. 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.036.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Le & Xin Wang. 2019. Cyber asset in judicial discourses: A socio-semiotic interpretation. Social Semiotics 29(4). 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1487110.Search in Google Scholar

Cobley, Paul (ed.). 2001. The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

De Carvalho, Evandro-Menezes. 2011. Semiotics of international law: Trade and translation. Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9011-9Search in Google Scholar

De Vos, Pol, De Ceukelaire Win, Malaise Geraldine, Pérez Dennis, Lefèvre Pierre & Van der Stuyft Patrick. 2009. Health through people’s empowerment: A rights-based approach to participation. Health and Human Right 11(1). 23–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/40285215.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 3(2). 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004.Search in Google Scholar

Gray, Virginia, Lowery David & Jennifer K. Benz. 2013. Interest groups and health care reform across the United States. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.10.1353/book25311Search in Google Scholar

Gu, Xin. 2018. Social policy and welfare state construction. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hodge, Robert & Gunther Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. New York: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, Baisheng, Jianhua Wan & Wei Wang. 2017. Medical law science. Nanjing: Southeast University Press.10.15354/sim.17.re029Search in Google Scholar

Kinney, Eleanor D. 2007. Recognition of the international human right to health and health care in the United States. Rutgers Law Review 60(2). 335–380.Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Jingxia. 2014. Medical system reform and construction of health insurance industry chain. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Gongshang University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Koslow, Jennifer L. 2009. Cultivating health. Ithaca, New York: Rutgers University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2001. Sociolinguistics and social semiotics. In Cobley Paul (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics and linguistics, 66–82. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, Massimo. 2019. The observer actant in the contemporary legal discourse: A semiotic meditation. Social Semiotics 29(3). 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587836.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, Massimo. 2021. From fingers to faces: Visual semiotics and digital forensics. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue 34(2). 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09766-x.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jian. 2017. A sociosemiotic interpretation of legal terms: A case study on ordinary residence. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University 4. 59–65.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jian, Le Cheng & Winnie Cheng. 2016. Deontic meaning making in legislative discourse. Semiotica 209. 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Jian & Yuxiu Sun. 2019. Meaning construction in legislative discourse: A sociosemiotic interpretation on supervision system reform in China. Social Semiotics 29(3). 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587849.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Jia & Jianfei Li. 2011. Social law review, vol. 5. Beijing: China Renmin University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milcent, Carine. 2018. The rise of violence as a result of inefficiency in the healthcare system. In Healthcare reform in China: From violence to digital healthcare, 171–190. Cham: Palgrave Pivot.10.1007/978-3-319-69736-9_8Search in Google Scholar

Mindt, Dieter. 1991. Syntactic evidence for semantic distinctions in English. In Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds.), English corpus linguistics, 182–196. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Ongstad, Sigmund. 2019. A conceptual framework for studying evolutionary origins of life-genres. Biosemiotics 12(2). 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-019-09358-8.Search in Google Scholar

Pei, Jiamin & Le Cheng. 2019. Discursive profile of international telecommunication regulations as institutional dialogue: A sociosemiotic perspective. Social Semiotics 29(3). 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1681075.Search in Google Scholar

Pharoah, Mark. 2020. Causation and information: Where is biological meaning to be found? Biosemiotics 13(3). 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-020-09397-6.Search in Google Scholar

Ponzio, Augusto. 2016. Justice and the right to non-functionality. International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(1). 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Qiu, Yonggui, Rong Fan & Yongsheng Guo. 2016. Legal practice of medical institutions. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Gongshang University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ramcharan, Bertrand G. 2005. Judicial protection of economic, social and cultural rights: Cases and materials. The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden.10.1163/9789047408123Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Lucy & McKee Martin. 2009. Factors influencing antibiotic prescribing in China: An exploratory analysis. Health Policy 90(1). 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.09.002.Search in Google Scholar

Richard, Saltman, Reinhard Busse & Josep Figueras. 2006. Decentralization in health care: Strategies and outcomes. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Scott, Jacob. 2009. Codified canons and the common law of interpretation. The Georgetown Law Journal 98. 341–431.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2008a. The phrase, the whole phrase, and nothing but the phrase. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meuier (eds.), Phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective, 407–410. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.139.33sinSearch in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 2008b. “Preface” in phraseology: An interdisciplinary perspective. In Sylviane Granger & Fanny Meuier (eds.), xv–xviii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.139.03sinSearch in Google Scholar

Silbey, Susan. 2010. Legal culture and cultures of legality. In Laura Grindstaff, Ming-Cheng M. Lo & John R. Hall (eds.), Handbook of cultural sociology, 470–479. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Solan, Lawrence M. & Tammy Gales. 2016. Finding ordinary meaning in law: The judge, the dictionary or the corpus? International Journal of Legal Discourse 1(2). 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2016-0016.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanou, Constantin & Helen Xanthaki. 2016. Drafting legislation: A modern approach. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315578026Search in Google Scholar

Sun, Yuxiu & Le Cheng. 2017. Linguistic variation and legal representation in legislative discourse: A corpus-based multi-dimensional study. International Journal of Legal Discourse 2(2). 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Talbot, Lyn & Glenda Verrinder. 2017. Promoting health: The primary health care approach. Australia: Elsevier Health Sciences.Search in Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203647028Search in Google Scholar

Voloshinov, Valentin N. & Michail M. Bachtin. 1986. Marxism and the philosophy of language. London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Matthew. 2018. How language works in politics: The impact of vague legislation on policy. Bristal: Bristal University Press.10.1332/policypress/9781529200201.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer. 2009. Methods for critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Jingjing & Le Cheng. 2020. Evidentiality of court judgments in the People’s Republic of China: A semiotic perspective. Semiotica (236–237). 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0031.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, Jingjing & Yuxiu Sun. 2019. Study on utterance of administrative law enforcement in van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Legal Discourse 4(2). 217–236.10.1515/ijld-2019-2024Search in Google Scholar

Xin, Yuchen & Lin Qing. 2018. Thinking and reform: Financial compensation and medical and health services. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences Press.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, Anbiao. 2020. Strengthening the legal guarantee for the construction of public health system—the latest interpretation of Basic Medical Hygiene and Health Promotion Law. China Law Review (3). 173–186.Search in Google Scholar

Ye, Ning, Le Cheng & Yun Zhao. 2019. Identity construction of suspects in telecom and internet fraud discourse: From a sociosemiotic perspective. Social Semiotics 29(3). 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587847.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Yi. 2015. Comparative research on international medical system reform. Beijing: Xinhua Press.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-20
Accepted: 2021-08-29
Published Online: 2021-11-24
Published in Print: 2021-12-20

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijld-2021-2054/html
Scroll to top button