Home Personalizing Entrepreneurial Learning: A Pedagogy for Facilitating the Know Why
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Personalizing Entrepreneurial Learning: A Pedagogy for Facilitating the Know Why

  • Karen Williams Middleton EMAIL logo and Anne Donnellon
Published/Copyright: January 8, 2014

Abstract

As the global diffusion of entrepreneurship education continues, along with increasing investment in, and expectations of, educational initiatives, it has become important to articulate what we are teaching and why, along with the specifics of where, how, and to whom. Yet, despite a growing consensus about what constitute the entrepreneurial activities and competencies required to start a new venture, there has been little agreement regarding the content of entrepreneurship education, or how learning should be delivered (Bygrave 2007, TheHandbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship, 17–48. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited; Edelman, Manolova, and Brush 2008, Entrepreneurship Education: Correspondence Between Practices of Nascent Entrepreneurs and Textbook Prescriptions for Success. Academy of Management Learning and Education 7(1):56–70; Honig, Davidsson, and Karlsson 2005, Learning strategies of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Competence-based Management 1(3):67–88; Mwasalwiba 2010, Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Its Objectives, Teaching Methods, and Impact Indicators. Education+Training 52(1):20–47).

Clearly, the purpose of any education, the “why” for the teacher, shapes the content, the “what”, and the method, the “how”. But what about the personal “how” and “why” for the learner? Sarasvathy’s theory of effectuation (Sarasvathy 2001, Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review 26(2):243–63; 2008, New Horizons in Entrepreneurship, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar) has led educators to consider how an entrepreneur’s personal resources and resourcefulness can and should alter their how. Scholars are now sharing pedagogical approaches for motivating that type of learning (Fletcher and Watson 2007, Entrepreneurship, Management Learning and Negotiated Narratives: ‘Making it Otherwise for Us – Otherwise for Them’. Management Learning 38(1):9–26; Gibb 2011, Concepts into practice: meeting the challenge of development of entrepreneurship educators around an innovative paradigm – the case of the International Entrepreneurship Educators’ Programme (IEEP). International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 17(2):146–165; Kyrö2008, A Theoretical Framework for Teaching and Learning Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Business and Globalisation 2(1):39–55; Ollila and Williams Middleton 2011, The Venture Creation Approach: Integrating Entrepreneurial Education and Incubation at the University. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 13(2):161–78). However, little research has addressed the personal why for the entrepreneurial learner (Rae 2005, Entrepreneurial Learning: A Narrative-Based Conceptual Model. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 12(3):323–35; Rigg and O’Dwyer 2012, Becoming an entrepreneur: researching the role of mentors in identity construction. Education + Training 54(4):319–329).

In this paper, we seek to fill this gap by exploring how entrepreneurship educators can facilitate the personalized learning to develop the Know Why for nascent entrepreneurs in the process of becoming entrepreneurial. We combine theories of entrepreneurship practice, education, and learning to propose a model for entrepreneurial Know Why. We utilize a case study of an entrepreneurship program applying a learning-through-venture-creation approach to identify a pedagogical approach in which learning entrepreneurial Know Why is facilitated. Thus, the purpose of this paper is twofold: to contribute to the theory of entrepreneurial learning and to contribute to the pedagogy for entrepreneurship, by explaining the meaning and significance of the entrepreneurial Know Why and by describing an educational approach that facilitates its development.

Appendix

Table 2

general data for venture creation program, 1997–2011

VersionDescriptionGrad. yearNo. of studentsVenture teamsIdeas evaluatedVentures incorporated (surviving)
1:1997–20001-year masters (native language) with students recruited from the university only.A project-based pedagogy matches teams with ideas from the university environment for potential commercial development.199712453 (2)
199815561 (1)
199918571 (0)
200015551 (0)
2:2001–20041½-year masters (native language) with students recruited nationally. After ½ yearof preparatory courses, a venture-based pedagogy is used to incubate teamswith ideas for potential incorporation. A pre-incubator specially designed topartner with the program provides seed financing.200123786 (4)
200216584 (4)
200321685 (3)
200420674 (4)
3: 2005–20071½-year masters expands to include a life-science-specific “track” (previously onlygeneral technology). The first ½ year is restructured to be a “business creation laboratory”, simulating venture creation using university-based ideas.2005207135 (3)
20063412155 (5)
20073011195 (4)
4:2009–2011a2-year masters (English), students recruited internationally. Additional ½ year isan elective-period (2nd half of 1st year). Teams are formed at the end of 1st year,allowing for initiation of venture activities during the summer break.2009198135 (5)
20103512185 (5)
2011261116in progress
Total30410414850 (40)
Table 3

Alumni responses to survey question: What does it mean to act entrepreneurially?

What does it mean to act entrepreneurially?
Always considering and looking for new opportunities to create more business
For me it’s being opportunistic and see opportunities. It’s also about being persistent and firm and never give up. It’s also about being positive towards new things.
Take risks to achieve new/better business. Risks could mean to try novel methods/technology/business models in existing or new markets.
Creating value and developing new business
To me it means to not hesitate to drive initiatives for improvements and innovations despite not getting support from your immediate surroundings. It also contains a degree of circumventing obstacles and finding your way to your objectives even if it is not the most straightforward path.
Pursuing the realization of ideas. Trying to find ways to make the world a little better.
In constant chase of business opportunities
Putting thoughts into action
Grab opportunities not be afraid of "being on your own", never give up, being patient, sell, sell, sell and quite often without having anything concrete to demonstrate.
Taking the lead identify opportunities getting things done dare to explore new ways
See opportunities where many other would see problems.
Acting on opportunity and continuous adaption to circumstances
Business First
Think outside the box and that nothing is impossible to see opportunities in most situations and to try to make good use of them.
Always try to find a way of creating more value for your customers and being able to capture some of that value for yourself.
Make use of opportunities as they arise and not to be afraid of change.
To think outside the box to see the not yet seen and to execute what you believe in without ever looking back.
To realize dreams and ideas and create value out of it. To allocate the resources needed and engage people to do their best.
Constantly look for opportunities meet up with new people and places turn problems into benefits celebrate goals achieved and move forward when facing obstacles.
To me it means seeing opportunities and act on them in a most profitable way.
See opportunities and do something about them.
Meaningless theory. These are things you cannot learn in a school.
Thinking outside the box and then quantify the value of the thoughts.
To have a curious and inquisitive mindset regarding possible business opportunities in one’s life and the will to act upon those opportunities.
Be creative challenge common knowledge and procedures have drive and energy
Think outside the box drive innovation
To seize opportunities that arise and make something useful of them. To turn intangibles into tangibles.
Willingness to explore new opportunities.
To explore opportunities.
To take initiatives come up with new ideas and do something with them don’t let anything stop you find opportunities of solutions to problems in your everyday life.
Find new ways of solving problems and to see opportunities in challenges and a world of changes. Also try to change the system or bending rules not only acting within the traditional set up.
To take an idea into action that changes the current status.
Be creative do things and actually make things happen solve problems get the big picture as well as the details.
To look for and see opportunities and/or demands around you and to think of solutions to these problems/needs. But to be an entrepreneur you should also take action. One additional thing is to create needs or demands for something that isn’t there yet!
Finding and implementing better solutions through analysis creativity and hard work
explore new possibilities creative thinking and strong acting driving creation/change
To see the business opportunity where others don’t; With other small means achieve progress; Questions questions, questions; Driven
Hard question … to be willing to risk your own well-being; to see possibilities when other see pit-falls; to act instead of thinking and thinking and thinking
To create new things or improve existing ones
Good question! For me it is about not being stuck in a role. Being entrepreneurial for me is being able to adapt to different situations. Sometimes expected sometimes unexpected. Also I find it strongly related to having to learn many sides of a business not necessarily being the expert in every field, but know how to look for the knowledge you don´t have. An urge to move forward.
To actively pursue opportunities that have a chance to evolve into a strengthened situation for a project/team/venture/research/society.
Challenge established systems and thinking and focus on value creation
Going your own way and finding new solutions to improve our society.
To me it means many different things such as working independently, creatively and knowing that YOU are responsible for your assignments/projects no one else will do it for you, therefore it is up to you how you perform at your job. It also means that you DO things, not just say things. Anyone can sell in a concept, but few people can actually execute that concept/idea.
To plan and act according to my own desired outcome of a situation especially concerning professional goals but just as well to personal goals as well. It means to create the circumstances rather than to let circumstances rule the day.
Being able to develop and implement creative (or out of the ordinary) ideas
Analyzing mindset questioning facts seeing non yet existing opportunities, outside-the-box thinking, etc.
Thinking outside the box visionary motivated and driven by a vision
thinking strategically moving fast and breaking things
To see how value can be created from mere ideas to plan for it and then make it happen.
To find new ways of solving problems. To be creative and see things from new angle.
To take initiatives is a natural action for someone with an entrepreneurial mindset. To try to think up new ways of doing things.
Being able to find solutions to problems people care about and earn respect/recognition/money for presenting that solution.
To take initiative and find solutions/think in a new way.
Finding opportunities and pursuing them. It could also be activities that do not include business. Creating visions and get people involved in following them.
Seize the opportunity and make something out of it
Being able to identify ideas and value them from different stakeholders perspective e.g. it can be from decisions regarding what to put up on the homepage to come up with new functions that can be valuable for potential customers. To me it also involves taking risks – both economical and personal.
think outside the box focus on capitalizing on ideas finding potential in opportunities and threats
See possibilities and act on them
To dare to do new things, walk new paths, do things without neither perfect information nor preparation.
To look for opportunities ALL the time; Have a drive and transfer the same drive to people around you; Motivate others; Be able to plan execute and sell my ideas to people in my organizations; Dare to Swing Big
For me to act entrepreneurially is to look for more effective and better ways of doing something to identify something and be able to see what others don’t and to find possible different uses of something existing which other will desire to use just that they didn’t know it. To be able to identify new relationships that could be fruitful for both parties
To act entrepreneurially to me is to strive forward regardless of obstacles that occur be open and positive against new ideas and approaches get things done not just talk about it i.e. make it happen.
I have become more result oriented wanting action. I am seeing opportunities where others see problems to a larger extent than before. I am not neglecting risks but I can be aware of them and act anyway I guess I dare more than before. Networking it is great to have experienced that I can connect people to make things happen.
Find new ways of doing things and understand how I can interlink different things to create new products and services. One could say that thinking outside the box is a cliché but I definitely think that it is part of being entrepreneurial.
To see opportunities and encounter them with action
See opportunities and take them
Being creative in finding solutions and pursuing these ideas
Focus on business opportunities while being flexible in everything
See opportunities where someone else sees a problem and reach goals with a great drive and risk taking.
To think outside the box trying to improve already established processes being proactive risk taker
Taking more initiative which creates impact for society and my surroundings even though it consumes more energy than you have. Trying to encourage people who have ideas and make them believe then they can do it. Finally learn to live happily with a lousy salary.

References

Argyris, C.1991. “Teaching Smart People How to Learn.” Harvard Business Review4(2):415.Search in Google Scholar

Åstebro, T., N.Bazzazian, and S.Braguinsky. 2012. “Startups by Recent University Graduates and Their Faculty: Implications for University Entrepreneurship Policy.” Research Policy41(4):66377.10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Bandura, A. 1997. Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Baron, R. A. 2008. “The Role of Affect in the Entrepreneurial Process.” Academy of Management Review33(2):32840.10.5465/amr.2008.31193166Search in Google Scholar

Baron, R. A., and R. A.Henry. 2006. “Why Do Some Entrepreneurs Achieve Extraordinary Success? Insights from Cognitive Science Research on Exceptional Performance.” In Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Bloomington, IN.Search in Google Scholar

Barr, S. H., T.Baker, S. K.Markham, and A. I.Kingon. 2009. “Bridging the Valley of Death: Lessons Learned from 14 Years of Commercialization of Technology Education.” Academy of Management Learning and Education8(3):37088.Search in Google Scholar

Bechard, J.-P., and D.Gregoire. 2005. “Entrepreneurship Education Research Revisited: The Case of Higher Education.” Academy of Management Learning and Education4(1):2243.10.5465/amle.2005.16132536Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, R. 2006. “Business Lecturers’ Perceptions of the Nature of Entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research12(3):16588.10.1108/13552550610667440Search in Google Scholar

Berggren, E. 2011. “The Entrepreneurial University’s Influence on Commercialisation of Academic Research – The Illustrative Case of Chalmers University of Technology.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business12(4):42944.10.1504/IJESB.2011.039684Search in Google Scholar

Blank, S. 2005. The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products That Win, 2nd ed. San Mateo, CA: Cafepress.com.Search in Google Scholar

Blank, S., and B.Dorf. 2012. The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-by-Step Guide for Building a Great Company, Vol. 1. Pescadero, CA: K&S Ranch Publishing Division.Search in Google Scholar

Blenker, P., P.Dreisler, H. M.Færgemann, and J.Kjeldsen. 2008. “A Framework for Developing Entrepreneurship Education in a University Context.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business5(1):4563.10.1504/IJESB.2008.015953Search in Google Scholar

Boocock, G., R.Frank, and L.Warren. 2009. “Technology-Based Entrepreneurship Education: Meeting Educational and Business Objectives.” Entrepreneurship and Innovation10(1):4353.10.5367/000000009787414226Search in Google Scholar

Boud, D., R. Keogh, and D. Walker, eds. 1985. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brannick, T., and D.Coghlan. 2007. “In Defense of Being ‘Native’: The Case for Insider Academic Research.” Organizational Research Methods10(1):5974.10.1177/1094428106289253Search in Google Scholar

Brophy, M., and T.Kiely. 2002. “Competencies: A New Sector.” Journal of European Industrial Training26(2/3/4):16576.10.1108/03090590210422049Search in Google Scholar

Bygrave2007. “The Entrepreneurship Paradigm” Revisited Seventeen Years Later. In The Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship, edited by H.Neergaard and J. P.Ulhöi, 1748. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Carrier, C. 2005. “Pedagogical Challenges in Entrepreneurship Education.” In The Dynamics of Learning Entrepreneurship in a Cross-Cultural University Context, edited by P. Kyrö and C. Carrier, 136–158. Hämeenlinna: University of Tampere.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, J., and A.Rieple. 2013. “Assessing Students’ Entrepreneurial Skills Development in Live Projects.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development20(1):22541.10.1108/14626001311298501Search in Google Scholar

Charney, A., and G. D.Libecap. 2001. “The Economic Contributional Entrepreneurship Education: An Evaluation with an Established Program.” In Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth 1–45. No longer published by Elsevier.10.1016/S1048-4736(00)12002-8Search in Google Scholar

Coghlan, D. 2007. “Insider Action Research: Opportunities and Challenges.” Management Research News30(5):33543.10.1108/01409170710746337Search in Google Scholar

Coghlan, D., and T.Brannick. 2005. Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization. London, UK: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Cope, J. 2005. “Toward a Dynamic Learning Perspective of Entrepreneurship.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4):37397.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dickson, P. H., G. T.Solomon, and K. M.Weaver. 2008. “Entrepreneurial Selection andSuccess: Does Education Matter?Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development15(2):23958.10.1108/14626000810871655Search in Google Scholar

Down, S. 2006. Narratives of Enterprise: Crafting Entrepreneurial Self-Identity in a Small Firm. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Edelman, Manolova, and Brush. 2008. “Entrepreneurship Education: Correspondence Between Practices of Nascent Entrepreneurs and Textbook Prescriptions for Success.” Academy of Management Learning and Education7(1):5670.10.5465/amle.2008.31413862Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, L.-J., and E.Muir. 2012. “Evaluating Enterprise Education: Why Do It?Education+Training54(4):27890.10.1108/00400911211236136Search in Google Scholar

Egan, K. 2008. The Future of Education: Reimagining Our Schools from the Ground up. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review14(4):53250.10.2307/258557Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher, and Watson, 2007. “Entrepreneurship, Management Learning and Negotiated Narratives: ‘Making it Otherwise for Us – Otherwise for Them’.” Management Learning38(1):926.10.1177/1350507607073020Search in Google Scholar

Gartner, W. B., and N. M.Carter. 2003. “Entrepreneurial Behavior and Firm Organising Processes.” In Handbook of Entrepreneurship Research, edited by Z. J. Acs and D. B. Audretsch, 195–221. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/0-387-24519-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Gibb2011. “Concepts into practice: meeting the challenge of development of entrepreneurship educators around an innovative paradigm – the case of the International Entrepreneurship Educators’ Programme (IEEP).” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research17(2):146165.10.1108/13552551111114914Search in Google Scholar

Glancey, K. D., and R. W.McQuaid. 2000. Entrepreneurial Economics. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780333981245Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, D., K. McKone-Sweet, and H. J. Wilson, eds. 2011. The New Entrepreneurial Leader: Developing Leaders Who Shape Social and Economic Opportunity. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Hannon, P. D. 2005. “Philosophies of Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Education and Challenges for Higher Education in the UK.” In Entrepreneurship and Innovation May:10514.10.5367/0000000053966876Search in Google Scholar

Heinonen, J. 2007. “An Entrepreneurial-Directed Approach to Teaching Corporate Entrepreneurship at University Level.” Education+Training49(4):31024.10.1108/00400910710754453Search in Google Scholar

Henry, C., F. M.Hill, and C. M.Leitch. 2005a. “Entrepreneurship Education and Training: Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught? Part I.” Education+Training47(2):98111.10.1108/00400910510586524Search in Google Scholar

Henry, C., F. M.Hill, and C. M.Leitch. 2005b. “Entrepreneurship Education and Training: Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught? Part II.” Education+Training47(3):15869.10.1108/00400910510592211Search in Google Scholar

Hjorth, D., and B.Johannisson. 2007. “Learning as an Entrepreneurial Process.” In Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education, Volume 1: A General Perspective, edited by A. Fayolle, 46–66. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Honig, Davidsson, and Karlsson2005. “Learning strategies of nascent entrepreneurs.” Journal of Competence-based Management1(3):6788.Search in Google Scholar

Hytti, U. 2003. “Stories of Entrepreneurs: Narrative Construction of Identities,” School of Economics and Business, Turku University, Turku.Search in Google Scholar

Ibarra, H. 1999. “Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation.” Administrative Science Quarterly44(4):76491.10.2307/2667055Search in Google Scholar

Janssen, F., and S.Bacq. 2010. “Cultural and Outcomes-Related Issues in Implementing an Interdisciplinary Cross-Campus Entrepreneurship Education Program.” Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship23(1):73346.10.1080/08276331.2010.10593513Search in Google Scholar

Johannisson, B. 1991. “University Training for Entrepreneurship: Swedish Approaches.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development3(1):6782.10.1080/08985629100000005Search in Google Scholar

Jones, B., and N.Iredale. 2006. “Developing an Entrepreneurial Life Skills Summer School.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International43(3):23344.10.1080/14703290600618522Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, D. 2003. Entrepreneurship. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.Search in Google Scholar

Kirby, D. 2007. “Changing the Entrepreneurship Education Paradigm.” In Handbook of Research in Entrepreneurship Education, Volume 1: A General Perspective, edited by A. Fayolle, 21–45. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Kolb, D. 1984. Experiential Learning: Experience as a Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Krueger, N. F. 2007. “What Lies Beneath? The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Thinking.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(1):12338.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00166.xSearch in Google Scholar

Krueger, N. F. 2009. “The Microfoundations of Entrepreneurial Learning and … Education: The Experiential Essence of Entrepreneurial Cognition.” In Handbook of University-Wide Entrepreneurship Education, edited by G. West III, E. J. Gatewood, and K. Shaver, 35–59. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kutzhanova, N., T. S.Lyons, and G. A.Lichtenstein. 2009. “Skill-Based Development of Entrepreneurs and the Role of Personal and Peer Group Coaching in Enterprise Development.” Economic Development Quarterly23(3):193210.10.1177/0891242409336547Search in Google Scholar

Kyrö, P. 2008. “A Theoretical Framework for Teaching and Learning Entrepreneurship.” International Journal of Business and Globalisation2(1):3955.10.1504/IJBG.2008.016133Search in Google Scholar

Labaree, D. F. 2005. “Progressivism, Schools and Schools of Education: An American Romance.” Paedagogica Historica41(1–2):27588.Search in Google Scholar

Lackéus, M. 2013. “Developing Entrepreneurial Competencies: An Action-Based Approach and Classification in Education,” Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.Search in Google Scholar

Lackéus, M., and K. W.Middleton. 2011. “Venture Creation Programs: entrepreneurial education through real-life content [Interactive paper].” Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research31(9), Article 8.Search in Google Scholar

Leitch, C. M., and R. T.Harrison. 1999. “A Process Model for Entrepreneurship Educationand Development.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research5(3):83109.10.1108/13552559910284065Search in Google Scholar

Liao, J., and H.Welsch. 2008. “Patterns of Venture Gestation Process: Exploring the Differences between Tech and Non-Tech Nascent Entrepreneurs.” The Journal of High Technology Management Research19(2):10313.10.1016/j.hitech.2008.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, G. A., and T. S.Lyons. 1996. “Incubating New Enterprises: A Guide to Successful Practice,” Aspen Institute, Rural Economic Policy Program.Search in Google Scholar

LindholmDahlstrand, Å., and E.Berggren. 2010. “Linking Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Higher Education: A Study of Swedish Schools of Entrepreneurship.” In New Technology Based Firms in the New Millennium – Funding: An Enduring Problem, edited by R. Oakey, A. Groen, G. Cook, and P. van der Sijde, 35–50. Emerald Group Publishing.10.1108/S1876-0228(2010)0000008006Search in Google Scholar

Lundqvist, M., and K.Williams Middleton. 2008. “Sustainable Wealth Creation beyond Shareholder Value.” In Innovative Approaches to Global Sustainability, edited by C. Wankel and J. Stoner, 39–62. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.10.1057/9780230616646_3Search in Google Scholar

Lundqvist, M. A. 2012. “The Importance of Surrogate Entrepreneurship for Incubated Swedish Technology Ventures.” MORE ERG Working Paper ME1205:113.Search in Google Scholar

Mäkimurto-Koivumaa, S., and V.Puhakka. 2013. “Effectuation and Causation in Entrepreneurship Education.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing5(1):6883.10.1504/IJEV.2013.051672Search in Google Scholar

Markus, H. R., and S.Kitayama. 1991. “Culture and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation.” Psychological Review98(2):22453.10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Search in Google Scholar

Martín-Cruz, N., J.Hernangómez-Barahona, A. I.Rodríguez-Escudero, and F.Saboia-Leitao. 2012. “Training and Its Consequences on the Innovative Capacity of Entrepreneurs.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management15(3):23551.10.1504/IJEIM.2012.046597Search in Google Scholar

McMullen, J. S., and D.Shepherd. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Action and the Role of Uncertainty in the Theory of the Entrepreneur.” Academy of Management Review31(1):13252.10.5465/amr.2006.19379628Search in Google Scholar

McQueen, D. H., and J. T.Wallmark. 1982. “Spin-Off Companies from Chalmers University of Technology.” Technovation1:30515.10.1016/0166-4972(82)90010-4Search in Google Scholar

McQueen, D. H., and J. T.Wallmark. 1984. “Innovation Output and Academic Performance at Chalmers University of Technology.” Omega12(5):45764.10.1016/0305-0483(84)90045-8Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K. 2005. “Tuning up the Value Creation Engine: On the Road to Excellence in International Entrepreneurship Education.” In Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth: Cognitive Approaches to Entrepreneurship Research, edited by J. A. Katz and D. A. Shepherd, 185–248. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.10.1016/S1074-7540(05)08008-6Search in Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., L. W.Busenitz, B. J.Bird, C. M.Gaglio, J. S.McMullen, E. A.Morse, and J. B.Smith. 2007. “The Central Question in Entrepreneurial Cognition Research.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice31(1):127.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00161.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. K., and S. A.Chesteen. 1995. “Enhancing Entrepreneurial Expertise: Experiential Pedagogy and the New Venture Expert Script.” Simulation & Gaming26(3):288306.10.1177/1046878195263003Search in Google Scholar

Mitchelmore, S., and J.Rowley. 2010. “Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Literature Review and Development Agenda.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research16(2):92111.10.1108/13552551011026995Search in Google Scholar

Morris, M. H., J. W.Webb, J.Fu, and S.Singhal. 2013. “A Competency-Based Perspective on Entrepreneurship Education: Conceptual and Empirical Insights.” Journal of Small Business Management51(3):35269.10.1111/jsbm.12023Search in Google Scholar

Mwasalwiba, E. S. 2010. “Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Its Objectives, Teaching Methods, and Impact Indicators.” Education+Training52(1):2047.10.1108/00400911011017663Search in Google Scholar

Neck, H. 2011. “Cognitive Ambidexterity: The Underlying Mental Model of the Entrepreneurial Leader.” In The New Entrepreneurial Leader: Developing Leaders Who Shape Social and Economic Opportunity, edited by D. Greenberg, K. McKone-Sweet, and H. J. Wilson, 24–42. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler PublishersSearch in Google Scholar

Neck, H., and P.Greene. 2011. “Entrepreneurship Education: Known Worlds and New Frontiers.” Journal of Small Business Management49(1):5570.10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nutley, S., I.Walter, and H. T. O.Davies. 2003. “From Knowing to Doing.” Evaluation9(2):12548.10.1177/1356389003009002002Search in Google Scholar

Ollila, S., and K.Williams Middleton. 2011. “The Venture Creation Approach: Integrating Entrepreneurial Education and Incubation at the University.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management13(2):16178.10.1504/IJEIM.2011.038857Search in Google Scholar

Ollila, S., and K. W.Middleton. 2013. “Exploring Entrepreneurial Identity Construction: The Case of an Action-Based Entrepreneurship Education.” Paper Read at Nordic Academy of Management (NFF), Reykjavik, Iceland, August 21–23.Search in Google Scholar

Pittaway, L., and C.Edwards. 2012. “Assessment: Examining Practice in Entrepreneurship Education.” Education+Training54(8):778800.Search in Google Scholar

Politis, D. 2005. “The Process of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29(4):399424.10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 1997. “Teaching Entrepreneurship in Asia: Impact of a Pedagogical Innovation.” Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change6(3):193227.Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 2000. “Understanding Entrepreneurial Learning: A Question of How?International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research6(3):14559.10.1108/13552550010346497Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 2002. “Entrepreneurial Emergence: A Narrative Study of Entrepreneurial Learning in Independently Owned Media Businesses.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation3(1):5359.10.5367/000000002101299042Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 2004. “Entrepreneurial Learning: A Practical Model from the Creative Industries.” Education+Training46(8/9):492500.10.1108/00400910410569614Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Learning: A Narrative-Based Conceptual Model.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development12(3):32335.10.1108/14626000510612259Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 2006. “Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework for Technology-Based Enterprise.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management18(1):3956.10.1080/09537320500520494Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D. 2010. “Universities and Enterprise Education: Responding to the Challenges of the New Era.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development17(4):591606.10.1108/14626001011088741Search in Google Scholar

Rae, D., and M.Carswell. 2001. “Towards a Conceptual Understanding of Entrepreneurial Learning.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development8(2):15058.10.1108/EUM0000000006816Search in Google Scholar

Rankin, N. 2004. “The New Prescription for Performance: The Eleventh Competency Benchmarking Survey.” Competency & Emotional Intelligence Benchmarking Supplement2005:18191.Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, E., Ø.Moen, and M.Gulbrandsen. 2006. “Initiatives to Promote Commercialization of University Knowledge.” Technovation26:51833.10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, E., S.Mosey, and M.Wright. 2011. “The Evolution of Entrepreneurial Competencies: A Longitudinal Study of University Spin-Off Venture Emergence.” Journal of Management Studies48(6):131445.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00995.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rasmussen, E., and R.Sørheim. 2006. “Action-Based Entrepreneurship Education.” Technovation26(2):18594.10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.012Search in Google Scholar

Read, S., S.Sarasathy, N.Dew, R.Wiltbank, and A.-V.Ohlsson. 2011. Effectual Entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203836903Search in Google Scholar

Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Businesses. New York, NY: Random House Digital.Search in Google Scholar

Rigg, and O’Dwyer. 2012. “Becoming an entrepreneur: researching the role of mentors in identity construction.” Education + Training54(4):319329.10.1108/00400911211236181Search in Google Scholar

Sarasvathy, S. D. 2001. “Causation and Effectuation: Toward a Theoretical Shift from EconomicInevitability to Entrepreneurial Contingency.” Academy of Management Review26(2):24363.10.5465/amr.2001.4378020Search in Google Scholar

Sarasvathy, S. D. 2008. “Effectuation: Elements of Entrepreneurial Expertise.” Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781848440197Search in Google Scholar

Sarasvathy, S. D., and N.Dew. 2005. “Entrepreneurial Logics for a Technology of Foolishness.” Scandinavian Journal of Management21(4):385406.10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.009Search in Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Aldershot: BasiAshgate ARENA.Search in Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. 1984. “The Architectural Studio as an Exemplar of Education for Reflection-in-Action.” Journal of Architectural Education38(1):29.10.1080/10464883.1984.10758345Search in Google Scholar

Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, R. 2011. “The Role of Storyboards and Scrapbooks in Propagating Entrepreneurial Value in Family Business Settings.” World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development7(3):26071.10.1504/WREMSD.2011.040808Search in Google Scholar

Smith, W. L., K.Schallenkamp, and D. E.Eichholz. 2007. “Entrepreneurial Skills Assessment: An Exploratory Study.” International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development4(2):179201.10.1504/IJMED.2007.011791Search in Google Scholar

Suchman, M. C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review20(3):571610.10.2307/258788Search in Google Scholar

Swedberg, R., ed. 2000. Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View. Edited by R.Swedberg. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thoring, R. M., and K.Müller. 2012. “Design Thinking Vs. Lean Startup: A Comparison of Two User-Driven Innovation Strategies.” Paper read at ACI, at Boston, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Tynjälä, P. 1999. “Towards Expert Knowledge? A Comparison between a Constructivist and a Traditional Learning Environment in the University.” International Journal of Educational Research31(5):357442.10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00012-9Search in Google Scholar

Vohora, A., M.Wright, and A.Lockett. 2004. “Critical Junctures in the Development of University High-Tech Spinout Companies.” Research Policy33(1):14775.10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0Search in Google Scholar

Warren, L. 2004. “Negotiating Entrepreneurial Identity – Communities of Practice and Changing Discourses.” International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation5:2535.10.5367/000000004772913764Search in Google Scholar

Watson, T. J. 2009. “Entrepreneurial Action, Identity Work and the Use of Multiple Discursive Resources.” International Small Business Journal27(3):25174.10.1177/0266242609102274Search in Google Scholar

West, G.III, E. J.Gatewood, and K.Shaver. 2009. “Legitimacy Across the University: Yet Another Entrepreneurial Challenge.” In Handbook of University-Wide Entrepreneurship Education, edited by G. West III, E. J. Gatewood, and K. Shaver, 1–11. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Williams Middleton, K. 2013. “Becoming Entrepreneurial: Gaining Legitimacy in the Nascent Phase.” International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research19(4):40424.10.1108/IJEBR-04-2012-0049Search in Google Scholar

Winterton, J. 2002. “Entrepreneurship: Towards a Competence Framework for Developing SME Managers.” Paper read at United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship Conference Proceedings, Reno, Nevada.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

  1. 1

    Throughout the paper, the terms Know What, Know How, and Know Why will be used, but these are to be understood as having the prefix “entrepreneurial”, which is left off for space and ease of reading.

  2. 2

    Forty venture teams (38%) were involved with at least one termination and re-start, thus evaluating a new idea as a venture.

Published Online: 2014-1-8

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 4.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/erj-2013-0040/html
Scroll to top button