Home Medicine A validated LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of the novel combination antibiotic, ceftolozane–tazobactam, in plasma (total and unbound), CSF, urine and renal replacement therapy effluent: application to pilot pharmacokinetic studies
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A validated LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of the novel combination antibiotic, ceftolozane–tazobactam, in plasma (total and unbound), CSF, urine and renal replacement therapy effluent: application to pilot pharmacokinetic studies

  • Suzanne L. Parker EMAIL logo , Saurabh Pandey , Fekade B. Sime , Janine Stuart , Jeffrey Lipman , Jason A. Roberts and Steven C. Wallis
Published/Copyright: November 25, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

Novel treatment options for some carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens have been identified by the World Health Organization as being of the highest priority. Ceftolozane–tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin–beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic with potent bactericidal activity against the most difficult-to-treat multi-drug resistant and extensively drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens. This study aimed to develop and validate a liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of ceftolozane and tazobactam in plasma (total and unbound), renal replacement therapy effluent (RRTE), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and urine.

Methods

Analytes were separated using mixed-mode chromatography with an intrinsically base-deactivated C18 column and a gradient mobile phase consisting of 0.1% formic acid, 10 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile. The analytes and internal standards were detected using rapid ionisation switching between positive and negative modes with simultaneous selected reaction monitoring.

Results

A quadratic calibration was obtained for plasma (total and unbound), RRTE and CSF over the concentration range of 1–200 mg/L for ceftolozane and 0.5–100 mg/L for tazobactam, and for urine the concentration range of 10–2,000 mg/L for ceftolozane and 5–1,000 mg/L for tazobactam. For both ceftolozane and tazobactam, validation testing for matrix effects, precision and accuracy, specificity and stability were all within the acceptance criteria of ±15%.

Conclusions

This methodology was successfully applied to one pilot pharmacokinetic study in infected critically ill patients, including patients receiving renal replacement therapy, and one case study of a patient with ventriculitis, where all patients received ceftolozane–tazobactam.


Corresponding author: Suzanne L. Parker, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia, Phone: +61 7 33465104, E-mail:

Funding source: Merck Sharp and Dohme

  1. Research funding: This study was funded in part by an investigator-initiated grant from MSD. SLP is a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council-funded Fellowship (APP1142757), JAR is a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council-funded Centre for Research Excellence Research Excellence (APP1044941), Project Grant (1062040) and Fellowship (APP1048652).

  2. Author contributions: SLP: method design, data analysis, interpretation of results and writing of manuscript; SP: method design, data analysis, writing of manuscript; FS: study protocol design and writing of manuscript; JL: study protocol design and writing of manuscript; JAR: study protocol design and interpretation of results and writing of manuscript; SCW: method design, data interpretation and writing of manuscript.

  3. Competing interests: JAR has provided consultancy and has received grant funding from MSD. All other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

  4. Ethical approval: The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards, with ethical approval obtained for the use of drug-free human blood from the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee HREC/16/QRBW/211and HREC/17/QRBW/117.

References

1. World Health Organization. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.Search in Google Scholar

2. Koulenti, D, Song, A, Ellingboe, A, Abdul-Aziz, MH, Harris, P, Gavey, E, et al.. Infections by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria: what’s new in our arsenal and what’s in the pipeline? Int J Antimicrob Agents 2019;53:211–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.10.011.Search in Google Scholar

3. Nelson, RE, Slayton, RB, Stevens, VW, Jones, MM, Khader, K, Rubin, MA, et al.. Attributable mortality of healthcare-associated infections due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:848–56. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2017.83.Search in Google Scholar

4. Viala, B, Zaidi, FZ, Bastide, M, Dumont, Y, Le Moing, V, Jean-Pierre, H, et al.. Assessment of the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam in a collection of beta-lactam-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates at Montpellier University Hospital, France. Microb Drug Resist 2019;5:1325–9.10.1089/mdr.2018.0439Search in Google Scholar

5. Zhanel, GG, Chung, P, Adam, H, Zelenitsky, S, Denisuik, A, Schweizer, F, et al.. Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Drugs 2014;74:31–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-013-0168-2.Search in Google Scholar

6. Farrell, DJ, Flamm, RK, Sader, HS, Jones, RN. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane–tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57:6305–10. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01802-13.Search in Google Scholar

7. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves new antibacterial drug Zerbaxa; Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. Solomkin, J, Hershberger, E, Miller, B, Popejoy, M, Friedland, I, Steenbergen, J, et al.. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infections in an era of multidrug resistance: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cIAI). Clin Infect Dis 2015;60:1462–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ097.Search in Google Scholar

9. Wagenlehner, FM, Umeh, O, Steenbergen, J, Yuan, GJ, Darouiche, RO. Ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI). Lancet 2015;385:1949–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62220-0.Search in Google Scholar

10. Sader, HS, Farrell, DJ, Flamm, RK, Jones, RN. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against aerobic Gram-negative organisms isolated from intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in European and United States hospitals (2012). J Infect 2014;69:266–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2014.04.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Lerma, FA, Bermudez, RM, Grau, S, Arnillas, MPG, Sorli, L, Recasens, L, et al.. Ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of ventilator-associated infections by colistin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev Esp Quimioter 2017;30:224–8.Search in Google Scholar

12. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves new treatment for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia; Silver Spring: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

13. de Kraker, MEA, Davey, PG, Grundmann, H, Grp, BS. Mortality and hospital stay associated with resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli bacteremia: estimating the burden of antibiotic resistance in Europe. PLoS Med 2011;8:8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001104.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Chandorkar, G, Xiao, A, Mouksassi, MS, Hershberger, E, Krishna, G. Population pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane/tazobactam in healthy volunteers, subjects with varying degrees of renal function and patients with bacterial infections. J Clin Pharmacol 2015;55:230–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.395.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Miller, B, Hershberger, E, Benziger, D, Trinh, M, Friedland, I. Pharmacokinetics and safety of intravenous ceftolozane-tazobactam in healthy adult subjects following single and multiple ascending doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56:3086–91. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.06349-11.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Sime, FB, Lassig-Smith, M, Starr, T, Stuart, J, Pandey, S, Parker, SL, et al.. Population pharmacokinetics of unbound ceftolozane and tazobactam in critically ill patients without renal dysfunction. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;63:e01265–19. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01265-19.Search in Google Scholar

17. Roger, C, Cotta, MO, Muller, L, Wallis, SC, Lipman, J, Lefrant, JY, et al.. Impact of renal replacement modalities on the clearance of piperacillin-tazobactam administered via continuous infusion in critically ill patients. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017;50:227–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.03.018.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Carlier, M, Taccone, FS, Beumier, M, Seyler, L, Cotton, F, Jacobs, F, et al.. Population pharmacokinetics and dosing simulations of cefepime in septic shock patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2015;46:413–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.05.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Gao, CL, Tong, J, Yu, KJ, Sun, ZD, An, R, Du, ZM. Pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone/sulbactam in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2016;72:823–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2045-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Mariat, C, Venet, C, Jehl, F, Mwewa, S, Lazarevic, V, Diconne, E, et al.. Continuous infusion of ceftazidime in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration: pharmacokinetic evaluation and dose recommendation. Crit Care 2006;10:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3993.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Seyler, L, Cotton, F, Taccone, FS, De Backer, D, Macours, P, Vincent, JL, et al.. Recommended beta-lactam regimens are inadequate in septic patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapy. Crit Care 2011;15:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10257.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

22. Rawlins, M, Cheng, V, Raby, E, Dyer, J, Regli, A, Ingram, P, et al.. Pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane-tazobactam during prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy. Chemotherapy 2018;63:203–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000493196.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Sime, FB, Lassig-Smith, M, Starr, T, Stuart, J, Pandey, S, Parker, SL, et al.. A population pharmacokinetic model-guided evaluation of ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020;64:e01655. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01655-19.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Heffernan, AJ, Germano, A, Sime, FB, Roberts, JA, Kimura, E. Vancomycin population pharmacokinetics for adult patients with sepsis or septic shock: are current dosing regimens sufficient? Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2019;75:1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02694-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Sime, FB, Byrne, CJ, Parker, S, Stuart, J, Butler, J, Starr, T, et al.. Population pharmacokinetics of total and unbound concentrations of intravenous posaconazole in adult critically ill patients. Crit Care 2019;23:205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-019-2483-9.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ezquer-Garin, C, Ferriols-Lisart, R, Alos-Alminana, M, Aguilar-Aguilar, G, Belda-Nacher, JF, Carbonell, JA. Validated HPLG-UV detection method for the simultaneous determination of ceftolozane and tazobactam in human plasma. Bioanalysis 2018;10:461–73. https://doi.org/10.4155/bio-2017-0257.Search in Google Scholar

27. Rigo-Bonnin, R, Gomez-Junyent, J, Garcia-Tejada, L, Benavent, E, Soldevila, L, Tubau, F, et al.. Measurement of ceftolozane and tazobactam concentrations in plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS. Clinical application in the management of difficult-to-treat osteoarticular infections. Clin Chim Acta 2019;488:50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.10.034.Search in Google Scholar

28. Sutherland, CA, Ozbal, C, Nicolau, DP. Development of an HPLC-MS/MS method for the determination of ceftolozane/tazobactam in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Future Sci 2019;5:FSO352. https://doi.org/10.4155/fsoa-2018-0079.Search in Google Scholar

29. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bioanalytical method validation: guidance for industry. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2018.Search in Google Scholar

30. Matuszewski, BK, Constanzer, ML, Chavez-Eng, CM. Strategies for the assessment of matrix effect in quantitative bioanalytical methods based on HPLC-MS/MS. Anal Chem 2003;75:3019–30. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020361s.Search in Google Scholar

31. Sofronescu, AG. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis; 2015. Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/2093316-overview [Accessed 5 Oct 2019].Search in Google Scholar

32. Venkatesh, B, Scott, P, Ziegenfuss, M. Cerebrospinal fluid in critical illness. Crit Care Resuscitation 2000:42–54.10.1016/S1441-2772(23)02122-1Search in Google Scholar

33. Restek.com HPLC Columns, ultra columns; 2019. Available from: http://www.teknokroma.es/UserFiles/HPLC/Ultra.pdf [Accessed 5 Oct 2019].Search in Google Scholar

34. Liao, J, Sheng, HM, Sauri, J, Xiang, R, Martin, G. Structural elucidation of a dimeric impurity in the process development of ceftolozane using LC/HRMS and 2D-NMR. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 2019;174:242–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2019.05.057.Search in Google Scholar

35. Naicker, S, Valero, YCG, Meija, JLO, Lipman, J, Roberts, JA, Wallis, SC, et al.. A UHPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of piperacillin and tazobactam in plasma (total and unbound), urine and renal replacement therapy-effluent. J Pharmaceut Biomed Anal 2018;148:324–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.10.023.Search in Google Scholar

36. Rabbolini, S, Verardo, E, Da Col, M, Gioacchini, AM, Traldi, P. Negative ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry in the structural characterization of penicillins. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 1998;12:1820–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0231(19981130)12:22<1820::aid-rcm387>3.0.co;2-c.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0231(19981130)12:22<1820::AID-RCM387>3.0.CO;2-CSearch in Google Scholar

37. Sime, FB, Lassig-Smith, M, Starr, T, Stuart, J, Pandey, SL, Parker, SL, et al.. A population pharmacokinetic model-guided evaluation of ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2019;64:e01655–19.10.1128/AAC.01655-19Search in Google Scholar

38. Sime, FB, Lassig-Smith, M, Starr, T, Stuart, J, Pandey, S, Parker, SL, et al.. Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam in critically ill patients with an indwelling external ventricular drain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01698-20.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-07-16
Accepted: 2020-11-02
Published Online: 2020-11-25
Published in Print: 2021-04-27

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Home pregnancy tests: quality first
  4. Review
  5. Non-invasive determination of uric acid in human saliva in the diagnosis of serious disorders
  6. Opinion Papers
  7. Basophil counting in hematology analyzers: time to discontinue?
  8. The role of laboratory hematology between technology and professionalism: the paradigm of basophil counting
  9. Recommendations for validation testing of home pregnancy tests (HPTs) in Europe
  10. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  11. The use of preanalytical quality indicators: a Turkish preliminary survey study
  12. The Italian External Quality Assessment (EQA) program on urinary sediment by microscopy examination: a 20 years journey
  13. Non-HDL-C/TG ratio indicates significant underestimation of calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) better than TG level: a study on the reliability of mathematical formulas used for LDL-C estimation
  14. Evaluation of the protein gap for detection of abnormal serum gammaglobulin level: an imperfect predictor
  15. Impact of routine S100B protein assay on CT scan use in children with mild traumatic brain injury
  16. Using machine learning to develop an autoverification system in a clinical biochemistry laboratory
  17. Effect of collection matrix, platelet depletion, and storage conditions on plasma extracellular vesicles and extracellular vesicle-associated miRNAs measurements
  18. Pneumatic tube transportation of urine samples
  19. Evaluation of the first immunosuppressive drug assay available on a fully automated LC-MS/MS-based clinical analyzer suggests a new era in laboratory medicine
  20. A validated LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous quantification of the novel combination antibiotic, ceftolozane–tazobactam, in plasma (total and unbound), CSF, urine and renal replacement therapy effluent: application to pilot pharmacokinetic studies
  21. Immunosuppressant quantification in intravenous microdialysate – towards novel quasi-continuous therapeutic drug monitoring in transplanted patients
  22. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  23. Reference intervals for venous blood gas measurement in adults
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. Detection and functional characterization of a novel MEF2A variation responsible for familial dilated cardiomyopathy
  26. Diabetes
  27. Evaluation of the ARKRAY HA-8190V instrument for HbA1c
  28. Infectious Diseases
  29. An original multiplex method to assess five different SARS-CoV-2 antibodies
  30. Evaluation of dried blood spots as alternative sampling material for serological detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using established ELISAs
  31. Variability of cycle threshold values in an external quality assessment scheme for detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus genome by RT-PCR
  32. The vasoactive peptide MR-pro-adrenomedullin in COVID-19 patients: an observational study
  33. Corrigenda
  34. Corrigendum to: Understanding and managing interferences in clinical laboratory assays: the role of laboratory professionals
  35. Corrigendum to: Age appropriate reference intervals for eight kidney function and injury markers in infants, children and adolescents
  36. Letters to the Editor
  37. A panhaemocytometric approach to COVID-19: a retrospective study on the importance of monocyte and neutrophil population data on Sysmex XN-series analysers
  38. Letter in reply to the letter to the editor of Harte JV and Mykytiv V with the title “A panhaemocytometric approach to COVID-19: a retrospective study on the importance of monocyte and neutrophil population data”
  39. SARS-CoV-2 serologic tests: do not forget the good laboratory practice
  40. Long-term kinetics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in a cohort of 197 hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients
  41. Self-sampling at home using volumetric absorptive microsampling: coupling analytical evaluation to volunteers’ perception in the context of a large scale study
  42. Vortex mixing to alleviate pseudothrombocytopenia in a blood specimen with platelet satellitism and platelet clumps
  43. Comparative evaluation of the fully automated HemosIL® AcuStar ADAMTS13 activity assay vs. ELISA: possible interference by autoantibodies different from anti ADAMTS-13
  44. Significant interference on specific point-of-care glucose measurements due to high dose of intravenous vitamin C therapy in critically ill patients
  45. As time goes by, on that you can rely preservation of urine samples for morphological analysis of erythrocytes and casts
  46. Stability of control materials for α-thalassemia immunochromatographic strip test
  47. Reformulated Architect® cyclosporine CMIA assay: improved imprecision, worse comparability between methods
  48. Urine-to-plasma contamination mimicking acute kidney injury: small drops with major consequences
  49. Automated Mindray CL-1200i chemiluminescent assays of renin and aldosterone for the diagnosis of primary aldosteronism
  50. Use of common reference intervals does not necessarily allow inter-method numerical result trending
  51. Reply to Dr Hawkins regarding comparability of results for monitoring
Downloaded on 6.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-1196/html
Scroll to top button